standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 10 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | whether hippocampal neurons code elapsed time as a dimension in its own right, and how that coding relates to spatial coding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| contribution | the firing properties of time cells parallel those of place cells point for point, so time is an additional dimension integrated with spatial mapping rather than a separate system Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | hippocampal time cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | temporal information generated in the cerebral cortex and other brain areas may provide signals to time cells, or the phenomenon may arise from firing chains generated locally within the hippocampal circuitry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the chaining account is supported by place fields expanding backwards from their centre with repeated runs, as if each cell were driven by an earlier-firing one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the proposed resolution is a slowly evolving temporal context selecting among preconfigured firing chains, rather than either alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | prefrontal and parietal areas of the where stream turn out to be involved in the perception of time and project strongly to the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The origin of hippocampal timing signals - external input versus internally generated firing chains - is left unresolved. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any mechanistic reading of time cells: IT REMAINS A CENTRAL QUESTION WHETHER TEMPORAL INFORMATION ... ORIGINATES FROM ITS INPUTS OR IS GENERATED INTERNALLY | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The evidence reviewed is almost entirely restricted to hippocampal area CA1. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the anatomical reach of the whole review: STUDIES OF TIME CELLS HAVE FOCUSED ON HIPPOCAMPAL AREA CA1 BECAUSE THIS AREA SEEMS TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FOR TEMPORAL ORGANIZATION | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The temporal/spatial distinction may be superficial if both reduce to association by proximity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the time/space distinction the review is built on: IT REMAINS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT THE COMMON THREAD IN BOTH DIMENSIONS IS 'ASSOCIATION BY PROXIMITY' IN SPACE OR TIME | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | whether the temporal signal comes from the inputs, is generated internally, or both, is left as the central open question Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - inputs, internal generation, or a combination, all still open | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | one study reports new temporal patterns emerging with learning rather than existing chains being co-opted, against the preconfigured account Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the co-opted-chains account specifically: one study Quotation withheld | limitations[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the human recordings show slowly changing patterns rather than the punctate time-cell activations seen in rodents, so the cross-species claim rests on a phenomenon of different form Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the human-to-rodent join: the human patterns MORE CLOSELY RESEMBLE THE GRADUALLY EVOLVING TIME SIGNAL ... THAN THE SEQUENCES OF PUNCTATE TIME-CELL ACTIVATIONS in rodents, and are still read as the same phenomenon | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | studies of time cells have focused on hippocampal area CA1, with some evidence for CA2 but not CA3 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1], with what is known outside CA1: THERE IS SOME EVIDENCE THAT AREA CA2 (BUT NOT CA3) COULD ALSO BE IMPORTANT FOR TEMPORAL PROCESSING | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the author's closing possibility is that time cells and place cells are both reflections of association by proximity, which would dissolve the distinction the review is built on Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2], with the consequence spelled out: PLACE CELLS AND TIME CELLS ARE SIMPLY REFLECTIONS OF A BASIC FUNCTION OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the cue-and-structure vocabulary carried over term by term: temporal cues answering to spatial cues, temporal structure to spatial structure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | scalar timing, imported as the criterion a neural code must satisfy to count as a code for time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| senses | time cell and place cell are two names for ONE population - the same neurons, distinguished by which dimension the experiment lets you measure, not by which cells they are Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the parallel is term for term, not loose analogy: temporal cues answer to spatial cues, temporal structure to spatial structure, re-timing to re-mapping, time fields to place fields Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the name 'time cell' is a coinage of one particular study, made on the strength of an analogy to place cells - because they fire at moments as place cells fire at locations - rather than on a mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | scalar coding - later cells firing for longer - is not decoration but the property that adjudicates between the two mechanisms, since uniform-duration chains cannot produce it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | temporal coding in humans means gradually changing population patterns, while in rodents it means punctate successive activations; the review says so while treating both as the same finding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | judging an interval and remembering temporal organisation are separated, with the hippocampus central only to the second - so 'timing' names two roles with different anatomy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: hippocampal neurons firing at successive specific moments within a temporally structured period, filling it out Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: hippocampal time cells — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the view that the fundamental function of the hippocampus is spatial mapping and navigation (the paper's reference 75) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the scalar temporal context model (the paper's reference 69) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the view that the fundamental function of the hippocampus is spatial mapping and navigation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the strict chaining model in which time cells are a single fixed sequence of cell activations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the temporal context model of hippocampal coding, in its scalar variant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → the original reports of hippocampal temporal coding, criticised as confounded by location and distance travelled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS A SPATIAL CONFOUND. The original temporal-coding reports 'were initially criticized as being Quotation withheld across time and of distance travelled over time, so that the apparent temporal coding could reflect spatial rathe[r than temporal] coding'. The finding is not denied - an alternative explanation for it is offered, on one named variable. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the place-cell account of hippocampal function, by adding a temporal dimension carried by the same cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | time cells —same-as→ place cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE STRONGEST SAME-AS IN THE CORPUS: not two populations but one, given two names by two literatures. No lexical join could find this also in: time cells · place cells | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | scalar coding —operationalised-as→ time-fields Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: scalar time is read off the width of the field, not off any clock
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but larger time-fields later in the delay is scalar coding; operationalised-as is loose. also in: scalar coding · time-fields | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | firing chains —contrasted-with→ temporal context Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: CRITERION: uniform-duration chains cannot produce later cells that fire longer, and scalar firing is what the temporal context model predicts also in: firing chains · temporal context | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | temporal context —contrasted-with→ chaining model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: external source against internal generation - the two candidate origins the review is organised around also in: temporal context · chaining model | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | temporal context —causes→ firing chains Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: the proposed resolution: context SELECTS among chains rather than either mechanism acting alone. A proposal, hedged as 'perhaps the most likely' - weighted accordingly
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but 'perhaps the most likely' mechanism involves temporal context selecting firing chains; causes is hedged. also in: temporal context · firing chains | concept_edges[6] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | elapsed time —distinct-from→ distance travelled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: DECOUPLED BY DESIGN: treadmill speed varied randomly per trial so the two could be separated at all also in: elapsed time · distance travelled | concept_edges[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | distance travelled —contrasted-with→ elapsed time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: AND THE CONFOUND SURVIVED: most cells encoded BOTH, to differing degrees - decoupling vindicated the variable without eliminating the rival
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but most neurons encoded BOTH time and distance; contrasted-with is loose. also in: distance travelled · elapsed time | concept_edges[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | grid cells —part-of→ entorhinal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: and they too fire at particular moments, so the same dual coding appears one synapse upstream also in: grid cells · entorhinal cortex | concept_edges[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | CA1 —contrasted-with→ CA2 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: SCOPE: nearly all the evidence is CA1; CA2 has some support and CA3 explicitly none
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but CA1 is where time cells were studied and CA2 'could also be important'; contrasted-with is loose. | concept_edges[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | trace eye-blink conditioning —distinct-from→ firing chains Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER LEARNING CREATES THE PATTERN OR RECRUITS ONE. 'one study examining trace eye-blink conditioning Quotation withheld.' Both accounts predict temporally structured firing after learning and differ only on where the structure came from - which is invisible in the trained animal and visible only across learning. · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: the dissenting paradigm: new patterns EMERGED with learning rather than existing chains being co-opted
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but trace eye-blink conditioning produced NEW temporal patterns rather than co-opting firing chains; distinct-from is loose. also in: trace eye-blink conditioning · firing chains | concept_edges[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Hippocampal CA1 principal cells encode the temporal structure of remembered experience independently of the animal's location and movement. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Time cells and place cells are not distinct populations — the same hippocampal neurons carry both codes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Time-cell firing sequences emerge with learning, are specific to particular memories, and predict whether a subsequent memory judgement will be correct. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Several findings suggest a strict chaining model is unlikely to be the mechanism for time cells. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | This challenges the view that spatial mapping and navigation is the hippocampus's fundamental function. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | the original temporal-coding reports were criticised as confounded by the animal's changing location and by distance travelled over time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | later studies addressed this by tightly controlling the animal's location and movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FIRST RUNG: cells with reliable place fields were simply excluded from the analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SECOND RUNG: a general linear model separated location, speed and head direction from elapsed time, leaving an independent contribution of time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THIRD RUNG, THE DECOUPLING: treadmill speed was randomised per trial so that elapsed time and distance travelled could be disentangled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | over 80 percent of active neurons were modulated by elapsed time, position mattered little, but distance was also strongly encoded and most cells carried both Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FOURTH RUNG: head-fixed preparations removed location and movement altogether Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the conclusion the ladder licenses: CA1 principal cells encode temporal structure independently of location and movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AN EARLY DISSOCIATION: spatial representations differed across trials too, but equally on correct and error trials, so they did not predict memory accuracy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the firing patterns of many neurons re-timed when the delay was increased, even though the behaviour and locations of the animal during the initial period did not change Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cells firing later in the delay were active for longer, a scalar coding of time paralleling human and animal time judgements Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: the authors 18 observed - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author's rather than this record's. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE IDENTITY CLAIM: time cells are the same neurons as place cells, and in freely moving animals fire only when the animal is in a particular location Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same cells that fired at particular moments on the treadmill fired at particular places on the maze outside it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the reorganisation of time cells when a temporal cue changes parallels the reorganisation of place cells when spatial cues change Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | temporal cues and structure control time cells just as spatial cues and structure control place cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the proposal that follows is to treat hippocampal principal neurons as multidimensional rather than as either kind of cell Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | temporal coding is tied to memory three ways: it develops with learning, it is memory-specific, and it predicts judgement accuracy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A DOUBLE GRADIENT IN MONKEYS: time coding falls and object-identity coding rises going from entorhinal to perirhinal to inferotemporal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | QUALIFICATION ON THE CROSS-SPECIES CLAIM: the human patterns are slowly changing rather than punctate, closer to an earlier rat result than to the rodent time cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | place-cell sequences replay in compressed form during sleep and quiet wakefulness, so spatial coding is recapitulated temporally Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | when spatial and sequence strategies compete, the firing sequences follow whichever strategy the animal expressed on that probe trial Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FOUR ARGUMENTS AGAINST STRICT CHAINING, first: the cells changed their firing patterns even during the initial part of the delay, rather than simply adding cell activations during the extended segment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | second: strict chains cannot split to encode overlapping memories that share identical events Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | third: scalar firing is inconsistent with uniform-duration chain activations and consistent with the scalar temporal context model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | fourth: compressed replay would need a mechanism that can decompress back to the original intervals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | on the other side, firing chains appear to be preconfigured and then co-opted to organise events Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | DISSENT PRESERVED: one trace eye-blink study found new temporal patterns emerging with learning rather than existing chains being used Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: one study examining trace eye-blink conditioning reported - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author's rather than this record's. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the proposed synthesis is temporal context dynamics selecting specific firing chains Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | grid cells in medial entorhinal cortex also fire at particular moments during treadmill running Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | judging intervals and remembering temporal organisation are separated, with the hippocampus secondary to the first and central to the second Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[34] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the review's headline consequence: this challenges spatial mapping and navigation as the fundamental function of the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[35] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE AUTHOR'S CLOSING DEFLATION: it remains entirely possible that both dimensions reduce to association by proximity, making time cells and place cells reflections of one associative function Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[36] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | time cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: time cells | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | place cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: place cells | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | re-timing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: re-timing | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | temporal context model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: temporal context model | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chaining model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chaining model | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | place cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: place cells | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | time cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: time cells | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | scalar coding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: the authors 18 observed - THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS ROW ATTRIBUTES THE WORK TO SOMEBODY ELSE. The cited name is the subject of a result verb and the sentence carries no first-person marker, so the finding, quantity or definition is the CITED author's rather than this record's. The claim is true and the quote is verbatim - what is wrong is whose result the corpus says it is. Nothing edited, nothing withdrawn: the row is marked so a page can name the source. Where the record is a commentary or review, its claim relations layer usually already names the paper being discussed - the record knows at one layer and forgets at another. also in: scalar coding | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | replay Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: replay | content_tags.definitions[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | chaining model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chaining model | content_tags.definitions[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | over 80% — proportion of neurons active during treadmill running whose activity was modulated by elapsed time, in a study that dissociated time from distance travelled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | approximately 30% — proportion of hippocampal cells coding successive moments of the delay in head-fixed rats doing a delayed matching-to-sample task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | about 100 ms — the compressed duration within which seconds-long place-cell sequences are replayed during quiet periods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | over 80% — neurons active during treadmill running whose activity was modulated by elapsed time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | general linear model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: general linear model | content_tags.statistics[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | elapsed time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: elapsed time | content_tags.variables[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | distance travelled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: distance travelled | content_tags.variables[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.