standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | whether short-term synaptic plasticity can be seen at work in an intact brain during behaviour Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| contribution | monosynaptic efficacy varies with position and trajectory in a working memory task, beyond what co-varying firing rates can explain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | behaviour-dependent short-term synaptic plasticity in prefrontal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: We hypothesize that | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | one presynaptic neuron's increased activity can reduce its control of an interneuron while another's increases it, on the same postsynaptic cell Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | that opposite pattern on one cell argues for synaptic mechanisms rather than passive membrane properties Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | coincident discharge of two or more presynaptic neurons within 5 ms raises the target's firing probability supralinearly Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | dendritic spikes triggered by supersynchronous inputs are offered as a mechanism for that supralinearity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | sequences may reflect a receding assembly handing its content to the next, with lifetimes set by internal mechanisms including short-term plasticity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Only a small, possibly unrepresentative fraction of neurons and connections could be observed. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any population-level or connectivity claim: ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF NEURONS AND THEIR CONNECTIONS COULD BE MONITORED IN OUR STUDY | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Synaptic connections are inferred indirectly from extracellular cross-correlograms, not measured. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every reported synaptic connection: MONOSYNAPTIC INTERACTIONS CAN ONLY BE INDIRECTLY INFERRED FROM AN EXTRACELLULAR SIGNAL - inferred, not measured | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The cross-correlation method is insensitive to weak pyramidal-to-pyramidal interactions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the absence of weak pyramidal-to-pyramidal effects specifically: THE CROSS-CORRELATION METHOD MAY NOT RELIABLY DETECT AND ANALYZE WEAK EXCITATORY INTERACTIONS AMONG PRINCIPAL CELLS - a null here is not evidence of absence | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The jitter window size was a judgement call, which qualifies literal reading of the significance values. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the significance values themselves: CHOOSING THE SIZE OF THE JITTER WINDOW WAS A MATTER OF JUDGMENT, AND THIS SHOULD BE KEPT IN MIND IN THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF SIGNIFICANCE | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The position-dependence analysis is example-based, without corrections for multiple comparisons across cells. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the position-dependence analysis: OUR APPROACH HERE IS EXAMPLE-BASED, AND WE DID NOT EXPLICITLY COMPUTE MULTIPLE-COMPARISONS CONTROLS ACROSS CELLS | limitations[4] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The population firing-rate estimates need confirmation by more direct methods. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the population firing-rate estimates only: THE PRESENT ESTIMATES SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY FUTURE STUDIES USING MORE DIRECT METHODS | limitations[5] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | only a small percentage of neurons could be monitored, most are silent or sparsely active, and the population estimates are stated to need more direct methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0], with the added reason that most neurons are silent or sparsely active and so never enter the sample | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the cross-correlation method may not reliably detect weak excitatory interactions between principal cells, though it works for principal-to-interneuron connections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the observed principal-to-interneuron ratio is lower than anatomy predicts, attributed to the recording method or to silent principal cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any use of the cell-type composition as an anatomical estimate: the observed ratio IS LOWER THAN would be expected from anatomy, and the authors attribute the difference to the recording method | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the layer difference in trajectory selectivity is reported with the caveat that firing rate differences could influence it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the layer difference in trajectory selectivity: the authors report it with the caveat that firing-rate differences between layers could contribute to the effect | limitations[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | conditional inference by surrogate construction, with the null chosen to preserve every timescale but the one under test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | thinning - deleting observations at random until a nuisance variable is flat - imported as a power control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| controls | spike trains were jittered at a chosen timescale and the co-firing recomputed, so that only excess co-firing at the FINE timescale survives Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that a co-firing pair is explained by shared slow input rather than by a monosynaptic connection - co-firing at broad timescales is common without any direct connection · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the timing of the interaction was compared against what a passive membrane could produce Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the temporal structure is a passive electrical artefact - the membrane time constant or a changing input conductance in the postsynaptic cell · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | supralinear Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: supralinear | concepts[12] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | dendritic spikes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dendritic spikes | concepts[19] | the paper's words | |
| unhoused_relations | variation in firing rates → detectability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. RULED OUT BY THE AUTHORS AS AN EXPLANATION: because spikes are uniformly distributed across maze positions, the observed differences in monosynaptic activity are LESS LIKELY TO BE DUE TO firing-rate variation acting on detectability. A control argument, not a relation that holds - and no edge type can say a relation FAILS. | unhoused_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| senses | MONOSYNAPTIC here is an inference to the simpler explanation, not an observation - the named rival is shared input producing co-firing without any synapse, and the criterion that separates them is TIMESCALE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the surrogate is built so that its null contains everything EXCEPT the timescale of interest: jittering by ±5 ms preserves firing rates at broader timescales, so what survives cannot be explained by rate variation at tens of milliseconds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | functional synaptic efficacy is defined operationally as the magnitude of excess coincident spikes at short latency - it is a spike-count statistic, not a measured synaptic quantity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the independence assumption used by the standard shift-predictor approach is rejected here BY NAME, because broad-timescale effects alone can push short-latency co-occurrence above chance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the confound being controlled is DETECTABILITY rather than the effect: more spikes make a connection easier to detect, so a position-dependent rate would produce position-dependent detection with no change in efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: eight-shank silicon probe recording with jitter-surrogate cross-correlogram analysis and a spike-thinning control for detection power Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: excess short-latency coincident spiking between a pyramidal cell and an interneuron, changing systematically across the maze Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: behaviour-dependent short-term synaptic plasticity in prefrontal cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → previous studies reporting that short-timescale cross-correlations between neuron pairs vary with behaviour (refs 14-16, 33) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → those earlier studies' assumption that behaviourally varying short-latency cross-correlation peaks reflect pyramidal-pyramidal interactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → prior in vitro observations that excitatory inputs from different sources onto the same interneuron can be depressing or potentiating (refs 2, 5) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | reinterprets → earlier reports of behaviour-dependent short-term cross-correlations, assumed to reflect pyramidal-to-pyramidal interactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → in vitro evidence that pyramidal-to-interneuron synapses are plastic over tens to hundreds of milliseconds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → jitter and surrogate methods for separating fine-timescale from broad-timescale synchrony Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the independence assumption underlying shift-predictor identification of monosynaptic connections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION, STATED PRECISELY IN THE SPAN. 'Seeking more formal criteria for large scale analysis, a standard approach is Quotation withheld (that is, precisely, that the response of one neuron is conditionally exchangeable across trials, or shifts...).' The shift predictor is not wrong as arithmetic; it rests on an assumption the paper names in its formal form. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | monosynaptic —operationalised-as→ cross-correlogram Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: it can ONLY be inferred indirectly from an extracellular signal - the paper opens the section by saying so also in: monosynaptic · cross-correlogram | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | facilitation —contrasted-with→ depression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: both found, and elsewhere BOTH ON ONE POSTSYNAPTIC CELL from different presynaptic partners, which is what rules out passive membrane properties also in: facilitation · depression | concept_edges[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | cell assemblies —part-of→ mPFC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: distributed across a large volume with no spatial clustering of similar tuning also in: cell assemblies · mPFC | concept_edges[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | resampling / surrogate data methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: resampling / surrogate data methods | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permutation test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spike-jitter resampling for cross-correlogram significance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | kernel density estimation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: kernel density estimation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | multiple-comparison correction (family-wise error rate) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | confidence interval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: confidence interval | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | randomization by thinning (statistical power control) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cross-correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-correlation | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | jitter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: jitter | content_tags.statistics[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals | content_tags.statistics[11] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | On the seconds timescale, transiently active mPFC neurons formed sequences that reliably distinguished the rat's left and right maze trajectories. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | On the millisecond timescale, the efficacy of putative monosynaptic connections was modulated by task phase even after firing-rate co-variation was statistically accounted for. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Roughly equal fractions of connected pairs showed firing-pattern-dependent synaptic depression and facilitation in the behaving animal. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Presynaptic spikes coinciding within 5 ms drove the postsynaptic interneuron supralinearly, more than the sum of their separate effects. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 16-18% of neurons also fired differentially in the central arm, where movement trajectories and head directions were apparently indistinguishable. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Putative connection probability fell rapidly with the distance between somata. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Information in mPFC appears sparsely encoded by cell assemblies spread over a large volume. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | monosynaptic efficacy varied with position in the maze and with left versus right trajectory rather than staying constant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 67 of 343 pairs with significant excitatory connections showed identifiable position dependence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 495 of 62,408 directed cell pairs, 0.79 percent, had significant short-latency narrow peaks or troughs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | connection probability fell rapidly with distance but connections were found up to 1,200 micrometres apart Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE INFERENCE IS TO THE SIMPLER EXPLANATION: the named rival is co-firing from shared input with no synapse, and the discriminator is timescale Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE STANDARD ASSUMPTION IS REJECTED BY NAME: under independence, broad-timescale effects alone can raise short-latency co-occurrence above chance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and an informal observation is given as further reason: the independence approach reliably yields ambiguous putative connections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | each spike in each neuron was randomly and independently perturbed on a uniform interval of [-5,+5] ms, repeated independently 1,000 times to form the surrogate data sets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE NULL IS BUILT TO CONTAIN EVERYTHING BUT THE TIMESCALE OF INTEREST: jittering preserves broader-timescale rates, so what survives cannot be rate variation at tens of milliseconds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE CONFOUND IS DETECTABILITY: more spikes make a connection easier to detect, so a position-dependent rate could fake a position-dependent efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SO DATA WERE DISCARDED TO REMOVE IT: spikes were deleted at random until rates were flat to within ten percent across maze segments, and the analysis rerun Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the argument being that with spikes uniform across positions, a remaining position dependence is unlikely to be a power effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the conclusion survived thinning in several cases Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | in some pairs thinning was unnecessary because rates were already flat while coincidences were confined to part of the maze Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A PRIOR LITERATURE REATTRIBUTED: earlier work read such peaks as pyramidal-to-pyramidal, and physiological classification makes them mostly pyramidal-to-interneuron Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | neurons fired differentially by trajectory already in the central arm, where movement and head direction were indistinguishable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the neuron already showed goal-specific elevated firing in the central arm, suggestive of goal representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a lingering-odour confound was ruled out: stem-area differential firing showed no reliable relationship with nose-poke firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and previous-trial reward position left only sparse traces in firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | environmental and motor differences alone cannot fully account for mPFC activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | individual cells fired at specific locations while the population as a whole fired uniformly over the apparatus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | one presynaptic partner's activity reduced its control of an interneuron while another's increased it, on the same cell Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | which argues for synaptic mechanisms rather than passive membrane properties Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | coincident presynaptic discharge within 5 ms raised target firing probability supralinearly Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE SILENT MAJORITY ACKNOWLEDGED: only about 10 to 25 percent of neurons in the sampled volume were active enough to cluster, and the estimates are said to need more direct methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the principal-to-interneuron ratio of 2.82 is lower than anatomy predicts, attributed to the method or to silent principal cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 633 units were recorded from anterior cingulate and dorsal prelimbic cortex in four rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | rats performed at 92 percent correct at the time of recording Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[34] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | functional synaptic efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: functional synaptic efficacy | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spike train Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spike train | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | coincident-time offset spike Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coincident-time offset spike | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | surrogate data set Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: surrogate data set | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | monosynaptic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: monosynaptic | content_tags.definitions[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | jitter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: jitter | content_tags.definitions[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | thinning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: thinning | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | position in the maze Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: position in the maze | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | jittered data sets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: jittered data sets | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | firing rates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: firing rates | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | trajectory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: trajectory | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 633 — Total well-isolated single units recorded from medial prefrontal cortex across four rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 495 (0.79%) of 62,408 — Cell pairs showing significant short-latency cross-correlogram peaks or troughs, i.e. putative monosynaptic connections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 2.82 ± 0.51 — Physiologically identified ratio of putative principal cells to inhibitory interneurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 67 of 343 — Excitatory monosynaptic pairs showing statistically identifiable position dependence of their interaction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 12.7% and 10.7% — Proportions of neuron pairs showing firing-pattern-dependent depression and facilitation respectively Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 92% correct — Mean behavioural accuracy of the rats on the odour-place matching task at the time of recording Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 40% versus 22% — Fraction of trajectory-selective neurons in the side arms in layer 5 versus layer 2/3 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.27 (62 cm) ± 0.17 (39 cm) — Mean standardized maze distance over which an individual neuron remained active (its firing 'lifetime') Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.79% — share of directed cell pairs with a significant short-latency peak or trough Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 67 of 343 — excitatory pairs showing position-dependent monosynaptic interaction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1,200 μm — the greatest separation at which a connection was detected Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 2.82 ± 0.51 — observed principal-to-interneuron ratio, against about 4 from anatomy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 92% correct — behavioural performance during recording Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.