standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 9 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | single neurons in human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, recorded while patients view cinematic episodes and again while they freely recall them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | how MTL neurons respond to episodes presented as film clips, and what they do later when those episodes spontaneously come to mind with no external stimulus present Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | shows that the same single neurons that fired during viewing fire again seconds before the verbal report of free recall, giving spontaneous human recollection a single-neuron correlate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | single-neuron reactivation during free recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: We suggest that | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | temporal precedence carries the causal weight: the neurons rise above baseline about 1500 ms before the verbal report, so the report cannot be what drives the firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the confound is ruled out by signature mismatch rather than by exclusion: epileptic activity is synchronous across neighbouring cells, whereas the observed responses are sparse and isolated among non-responsive neighbours Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | an anatomical dissociation inside the same experiment serves as the control condition: medial frontal units are selective during viewing but lose that selectivity at recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | sparseness plus the size of the untested stimulus space is used to infer, without testing, that each neuron must also respond to many episodes never presented Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the recall signal is claimed to be readable on one trial rather than only after averaging, which is what lets a single spontaneous recall event be treated as an observation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the recall alignment is to the onset of the patient's own verbal report, so the experiment's time zero is supplied by the subject rather than by the experimenter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Findings come from epilepsy patients, so pathology cannot be ruled out with certainty. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any generalisation from these recordings to the healthy brain: ALTHOUGH THESE RESULTS SHOULD BE VIEWED WITH CAUTION, SUCH INTERPRETATION IS UNLIKELY FOR VARIOUS REASONS - argued against, not excluded | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Only a tiny fraction of possible episodes was tested, so the apparent selectivity of the neurons is an artefact of the limited stimulus set. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the selectivity claim itself: IT IS CLEAR, EVEN BY A SIMPLE STATISTICAL REASONING, THAT THESE NEURONS MUST DISPLAY SELECTIVE RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE OTHER CLIPS not tested here | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Which feature of a clip a cell actually responds to cannot be determined. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim about WHICH feature drove the response: IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN CLAIMS AS TO WHAT EXACT ASPECT OF THE CLIPS THE CELL RESPONDED TO | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Regions that might carry top-down recall signals were not sampled. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the claim that recall signals originate where they were recorded: Quotation withheld | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Whether the multiple clips a neuron responds to share an abstract association is unresolved. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any abstract-association reading: WHETHER MULTIPLE CLIPS TO WHICH A NEURON RESPONDS MAY BE RELATED BY SOME ABSTRACT ASSOCIATION RULE IS NOT CLEAR AT PRESENT | limitations[4] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | which brain regions were sampled was decided by clinical need, not by the hypothesis — the coverage of the study is a by-product of surgical planning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the anatomical coverage of the whole study: Quotation withheld | limitations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the origin of the recall signal may lie in regions the electrodes never reached Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[3] - the origin of the recall signal may be outside the sampled regions | limitations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the subjects all have intractable epilepsy, so a pathology explanation cannot be excluded outright, only argued against Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the subjects all have intractable epilepsy | limitations[7] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | what feature of a clip a cell is actually responding to is undetermined Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] - what aspect of a clip drove the cell is undetermined | limitations[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | whether the several clips one neuron responds to share any abstract rule is left open Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[4] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4] - the abstract-rule question is open | limitations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the inhibitory half of the effect could not be resolved in single cells because baseline firing is too low to see a decrease Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the inhibitory half of the effect: BECAUSE OF THE LOW BASELINE FIRING RATE, THESE INHIBITORY RESPONSES WERE EVIDENT ONLY AT THE POPULATION LEVEL | limitations[10] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the place-cell response profile — sparse firing from a very low baseline, sharply selective for one condition — imported as the expected shape of a human episode-selective response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the claim that navigational machinery was conserved and repurposed, used to license reading a spatial-memory literature as a memory literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the analysis re-run with the questionable units removed, and the result reported unchanged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the reactivation effect resting on units whose classification is doubtful - the re-run without them is what shows it does not · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | response — sustained: elevated firing through most of the clip, up to 12 s Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | response — transient: elevation only during particular segments of a clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | response — the brief 300–600 ms MTL response of the prior stationary-stimulus literature, the sense this paper departs from Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| senses | episode — the general cognitive object: multimodal representations linked in temporal succession Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | episode — the experimental stimulus, i.e. what a single 5-to-10-s clip depicts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | episode — a sub-part contained within one clip, the grain a transient response may be picking out Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | unit — single unit (one isolated neuron) versus multi unit (unresolved cluster); both are counted together as units throughout Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | responsive — defined by consistency across all trials of a clip, not by response size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | recall — the internal event, versus the verbal report that makes it observable; the paper keeps these apart and measures the lag between them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: single-unit and multi-unit recording from clinically placed depth electrodes in epilepsy patients, across a viewing session and a later free-recall session Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: free recall — the spontaneous, internally generated emergence of an episodic memory into consciousness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: single-neuron reactivation during free recall — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → rodent studies of internally generated hippocampal replay during sleep, rest and waking (refs 27-33) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → prior reports of selective single-unit activation during mental imagery of stationary stimuli (ref 25) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → rodent work on internally generated hippocampal replay (refs 27–33), which could not be tied to recall because the animal cannot declare a memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER REPLAY HAS EVER BEEN TIED TO RECALL. 'Quotation withheld' The rodent replay literature is not disputed; the LINK to recall is called conjecture - and this record's [0] gives the reason it had to be, since free recall requires a declaration an animal cannot make. The limitation and its cause, in two rows of one paper. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → neuroimaging studies of reinstatement at recall (refs 21–24), whose resolution could not reach single neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: indirectly measure | claim_relations[3] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the prior single-unit picture of MTL responses as brief, 300–600 ms events that rarely outlast 1 to 2 s Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → prior single-unit imagery work (ref 25), which used an external content-specific cue Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the established finding that human MTL neurons respond selectively to complex stimuli, categories and individual persons or landmarks (refs 5–11) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | free recall —contrasted-with→ recognition memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE EVENT IS OBSERVABLE TO THE EXPERIMENTER. 'Whereas the neuronal basis of recognition memory can be probed experimentally in human and nonhuman primates, Quotation withheld.' The two are not distinguished by any property of memory - they are distinguished by WHETHER THE EXPERIMENTER CAN SEE THE EVENT HAPPEN, so the division is one of experimental access and it explains why one literature is larger than the other. · strength of the relation: 0.95 also in: free recall · recognition memory | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | RETRACTED (NO RENAMING, AND THE SECOND ENDPOINT IS NOT IN THE SPAN) · replay —renamed-across-fields→ reactivation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. RETRACTED: NO RENAMING, AND THE SECOND ENDPOINT IS NOT IN THE SPAN. The edge is 'replay --renamed-across-fields--> reactivation'. The span reads: 'now DIRECTLY…' It names 'replay' and links it to FREE RECALL - not to 'reactivation', which does not appear at all. A renaming names BOTH names; this names one and relates it to a third thing. Found by reading the whole 'renamed-across-fields' untested population, 21 of 21, where it is one of only three genuinely weak edges against ~18 that were sound. — strength of the relation: 0.65 — the record marks this weak
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span links recall to neuronal replay; renamed-across-fields 'reactivation' is loose. also in: replay · reactivation | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | RETRACTED (SAME FAULT, SAME PAPER, DIFFERENT ENDPOINT) · reinstated —renamed-across-fields→ reactivation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. RETRACTED: SAME FAULT, SAME PAPER, DIFFERENT ENDPOINT. The edge is 'reinstated --renamed-across-fields--> reactivation'. The span - 'the BOLD signal…' - names 'reinstated' and describes when it happens. 'reactivation' is absent. Both this and [1] point at the same missing term, which suggests the tagger had a synonym set in mind that the paper never states in one place. WHAT THE SPAN DOES SAY: that learning-period activity is reinstated at recall, measured by BOLD, with the fMRI caveat attached - a phenomenon, not a terminological equivalence, and it is already carried by other tags on this record. — strength of the relation: 0.6 — the record marks this weak · note: endpoint was 'BOLD signal', which is a measurement modality, not another NAME for the phenomenon. The renaming the quote reports is reinstated/reactivation. Caught by querying the corpus for the cross-vocabulary link this edge was recorded to provide, and finding it did not bridge.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says learning activity is reinstated at recall; renamed-across-fields is loose. also in: reinstated · reactivation | concept_edges[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | sustained response —distinct-from→ transient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'in a sustained or transient manner'; it lists the two, it does not distinguish them. also in: sustained response · transient | concept_edges[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | reactivation —operationalised-as→ FR ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but reactivation was measured as a firing-rate ratio; operationalised-as is loose. also in: reactivation · FR ratio | concept_edges[4] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | reactivation —is-a→ neuronal correlate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.75
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the authors 'SUGGEST' the reactivation is a neuronal correlate of recollection; is-a is hedged. also in: reactivation · neuronal correlate | concept_edges[5] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | mental imagery —contrasted-with→ free recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'our study' = free recall (previous sentences); contrasted-with is loose. also in: mental imagery · free recall | concept_edges[7] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | hippocampus —part-of→ medial temporal lobe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85 also in: hippocampus · medial temporal lobe | concept_edges[8] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · verbal report —operationalised-as→ free recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span named neither endpoint. This sentence names both and states how the measure was taken - a verbal report AT THE TIME OF free recall. — strength of the relation: 0.9
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but verbal reports of memories were given AT THE TIME OF free recall; operationalised-as is loose. also in: verbal report · free recall | concept_edges[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chi-squared Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chi-squared | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard error of the mean | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation (used as a response threshold) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | gaussian kernel smoothing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gaussian kernel smoothing | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | two-sample t test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two-sample t test | content_tags.statistics[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Student’s t test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Student’s t test | content_tags.statistics[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | χ 2 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: χ 2 | content_tags.statistics[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | χ 2 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: χ 2 | content_tags.statistics[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SEM Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SEM | content_tags.statistics[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SD | content_tags.statistics[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | post–stimulus time histogram Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: post–stimulus time histogram | content_tags.statistics[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A subset of human medial temporal lobe neurons fired selectively and in a sustained way throughout and after specific video episodes, for durations up to 12 seconds. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The same hippocampal and entorhinal neurons reactivated before the patient verbally reported freely recalling the corresponding episode. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Reactivation at recall appeared in the hippocampal and entorhinal populations but not in medial frontal units. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In an individual recall trial, firing rose above baseline roughly 1.5 seconds before the verbal report and peaked shortly before speech onset, preceding rather than following the report. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Episode-specific reactivation was weak in amygdala and absent from parahippocampal gyrus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 54.9% of recorded units (475) responded significantly to at least one clip. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Only 27% of units were recorded within the epileptogenic seizure foci. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 475 units (54.9%) responded to at least one clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sustained responses were almost entirely an MTL phenomenon: 44 of the 46 such cells were in MTL, only 2 in medial frontal lobe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | responses lasted as long as 12 s and were typically ended only by the onset of the next clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | across the population, firing rose above baseline in the 3 s before the verbal report and stayed elevated for 2 s after it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the effect was present in hippocampal and entorhinal units and absent in medial frontal units Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | reactivation was strongest in cells whose viewing response had been sustained rather than transient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | within MTL the effect was weak in amygdala, absent in parahippocampal gyrus, and striking for hippocampal and entorhinal neurons with sustained responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the proportion of responsive units did not differ across the sampled regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | removing the 27% of units recorded inside the seizure focus did not change the result Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cells stayed at baseline during recall of clips that had not driven them at viewing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the population firing was already slightly elevated before clip onset, which the authors read as anticipation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | patients recalled a mean of 83.2% of the clips they had been shown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | responsive unit Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: responsive unit | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sustained response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sustained response | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | episode Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: episode | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | responsive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: responsive | content_tags.definitions[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sustained response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sustained response | content_tags.definitions[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | transient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: transient | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FR ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FR ratio | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | episodes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: episodes | content_tags.definitions[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | baseline firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: baseline firing rate | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | place cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: place cells | content_tags.definitions[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | instantaneous firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: instantaneous firing rate | content_tags.definitions[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clips with nonsignificant responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clips with nonsignificant responses | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: firing rate | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | baseline firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: baseline firing rate | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FR ratio Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FR ratio | content_tags.variables[9] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | onset time of the verbal report of recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.variables[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | preferred clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: preferred clip | content_tags.variables[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clip onset and offset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clip onset and offset | content_tags.variables[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sound amplitude of patient voice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sound amplitude of patient voice | content_tags.variables[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 857 units (441 single units and 416 multi units) — Total units recorded across patients in medial temporal lobe and medial frontal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 13 patients, 43 sessions — Sample size of epilepsy patients and of paired viewing and recall sessions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 83.2% (±5% SEM) — Mean proportion of presented clips that patients spontaneously recalled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 475 units (54.9%) — Units showing a significant response to one or more clips during viewing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 46 (9.7%) — Responsive units showing a sustained response to at least one clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 44 versus 2, P < 0.03 — Distribution of the 46 sustained-response cells between medial temporal lobe and medial frontal lobe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 15.57 Hz versus 2.11 and 2.23 Hz — Firing rate of the entorhinal unit during its preferred Simpsons clip versus other clips and blank periods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 17.7% ± 0.7 SEM (or 4.0 ± 0.2 SEM clips) — Average selectivity of responsive units: share of presented clips eliciting a sustained or transient response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1.4 ± 0.1 SEM clips (5.7% ± 0.5 SEM) — Average number of clips to which a sustained-response unit responded in a sustained manner Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 27% — Share of recorded units that lay within the epileptogenic seizure foci Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 857 units — total units recorded, 441 single and 416 multi Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 475 units (54.9%) — units responding to one or more clips Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 46 (9.7%) — responsive units showing a sustained response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 44 of 46 — sustained-response cells located in MTL rather than medial frontal lobe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 12 s — longest observed response duration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 15.57 Hz — entorhinal unit firing rate to the Simpsons clip, against 2.11 and 2.23 Hz for other clips and blanks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1500 ms — lead of the firing-rate rise over the onset of verbal report Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 100 ms — lead of the firing peak over verbal report onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 13 patients, 43 sessions — the sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 83.2% (±5% SEM) — proportion of presented clips spontaneously recalled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 17.7% ± 0.7 SEM — share of presented clips a responsive unit responded to, sustained or transient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1.4 ± 0.1 SEM clips — clips per unit driving a sustained response, i.e. 5.7% of those presented Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 27% — share of units recorded inside the epileptogenic seizure foci Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 300 and 600 ms — typical duration of MTL responses in the prior literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 5 to 10 s — duration of each audiovisual clip Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | n = 154 — responsive hippocampal and entorhinal cells in the population average Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | n = 56 — anterior cingulate cells in the control population average Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 20 cells — sustained cells holding elevated firing at least 1 s past clip offset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 48 clips — clip set shown to the patient of the entorhinal example Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 3 SD — threshold above session mean firing used to call a recall-time elevation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1200 ms — full width at half maximum of the smoothing Gaussian Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1 to 5 min — duration of the intervening task between viewing and recall Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 500-ms — bin width for histograms and the minimum window for calling a response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.