standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 7 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the sequence of processing stages a word passes through in the anteroventral temporal lobe, read from which cortical layer is active at each moment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether the sustained activity seen with scalp and macroelectrode methods is one extended process or a sequence of distinct stages too close together to resolve Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a laminar sequence - a middle-layer sink from about 120 ms, alternating middle and superficial foci until about 800 ms - read as feedforward input giving way to feedback and associative input, with repetition suppressing the later stages laterally and enhancing them medially Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | word recognition and repetition effects in the anteroventral temporal lobe Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | an initial sink in the middle layers is read as feedforward input from lower visual areas, because those layers are where such input terminates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | and the concurrent increase in firing is what makes it excitatory rather than inhibitory, since a sink alone does not decide that Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the later superficial focus is read as local and feedback associative input, which is where those afferents terminate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | and the medial structure shows two or three sinks at once, which may follow from its superficial and deep layers being anatomically distinct and physiologically somewhat isolated Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Only one laminar probe per subject was used, so the entorhinal repetition enhancement might be idiosyncratic to that patient. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The entorhinal repetition-enhancement finding requires further replication. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The CSD analysis is probably blind to synaptic activity on layer IV stellate cells. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | behavioral data for the Size Judgment task, the main implicit priming task, were lost. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the electrode targets and the duration of implantation were decided on clinical grounds with no reference to this experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the earlier non-invasive results remain consistent with a different account, because fields from separate sources superimpose in those recordings Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the relation of unit responses in macaques to field potentials in humans is unknown, for three separate reasons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | and the relationship between synaptic currents, action potentials and haemodynamics may vary between tasks and locations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the finding that feedforward and feedback information flow tends to involve different cortical layers, which is what lets the laminar data lead to hypotheses about the sequence of network interactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the forward model that turns a laminar current pattern into a predicted surface potential Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the electrodes themselves, placed for a purpose unrelated to the question Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the sequential-then-simultaneous account of ventral stream activation, and the dispute about it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the learning-versus-retrieval comparison re-run on NEW words only - new words during learning against new words during recognition testing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: repetition as the explanation of the larger retrieval response - if only new words are compared, nothing in either condition has been seen before · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a test with the formal properties of the memory tasks - visual presentation, key-press response - but with no words and no word repetition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the stimulus-response furniture of the testing situation: that entorhinal activity reflects looking at something and pressing a key rather than remembering · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | inferotemporal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: inferotemporal | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: firing | concepts[13] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | repetition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition | concepts[33] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | word Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: word | concepts[38] | the paper's words | |
| senses | THE SAMPLE WAS CHOSEN BY SOMEONE ELSE'S PURPOSE: the decision to implant, the electrode targets and the duration of implantation were made ENTIRELY ON CLINICAL GROUNDS WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THIS EXPERIMENT Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THREE AMBIGUITIES IN THE STANDARD MEASURE, ENUMERATED: it cannot tell sustained widespread activity from separate areas too close to resolve, it cannot tell inhibition from excitation so simultaneous activity could be either, and the presynaptic cell of origin is difficult to infer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE CORTICAL LAYER IS THE INFERENCE: since feedforward and feedback information flow tends to involve different layers, the laminar data lead to hypotheses about which is active Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and two measures are combined to remove an ambiguity neither removes alone - the sink says where, the simultaneous firing says that it is excitatory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | A FORWARD MODEL THAT JOINS THREE INSTRUMENTS AT THREE SCALES: the laminar pattern is used to PREDICT the surface potential, giving a positive peak near 200 ms, a variable one near 400 and a negative one near 600 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the prediction matches what macroelectrodes actually record, so non-invasive magnetic recording, intracranial macroelectrodes and laminar arrays give a CONSISTENT MULTI-RESOLUTION VIEW of the same component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE SIGN OF A PUBLISHED COMPONENT DEPENDS ON WHICH SIDE OF THE TISSUE THE ELECTRODE IS: the same potential is negative above the ventral surface and positive when recorded by subdural strips immediately below it, and the geometry explains both Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE RELATION BETWEEN TWO MEASURES IS NOT FIXED: here the sustained response carries the effects seen with haemodynamics, while in another area it is the phasic response that matches - so the relationship MAY VARY BETWEEN TASKS AND LOCATION Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THREE REASONS THE CROSS-SPECIES COMPARISON CANNOT SETTLE THE DISPUTE: the physiological measures differ, macaques lack language, and the areas expanded substantially in evolution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE EARLIER RESULTS SURVIVE A RIVAL READING: because fields from different sources superimpose in magnetic and macroelectrode recordings, the same data are consistent with the temporal components arising in different regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE SAME-COLUMN CLAIM IS LICENSED BY A SIMULATED DECAY CONSTANT: amplitude falls tenfold in about 250 micrometers, which is what lets multiple stages be called properties of one microdomain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE SAME TRANSITION TAKES 500 MS HERE AND 20 MS IN INTERICTAL SPIKES - the same tissue and the same measure, twenty-five times apart depending on what drives it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | OPPOSITE-SIGNED EFFECTS IN ADJACENT STRUCTURES: repetition suppresses the lateral areas and enhances the medial one, which is read as incidental priming against active retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the effect is absent from the first 100 ms, which is taken to mean it arises from sustained interaction across a network rather than focal plasticity in one antecedent cell group Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | with the model systems declared possibly unable to show it - the human interactions may be selective and information-specific in a way that electrical stimulation in anesthetized animals or in vitro cannot replicate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: current source density and multiunit activity resolved across cortical layers, with the laminar pattern used to predict what the surface potential should look like Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: the multi-stage cortical response to a word, and its repetition effects Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: word recognition and repetition effects in the anteroventral temporal lobe — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Miller and Desimone, 1994; Xiang and Brown, 1998 (macaque repetition suppression) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Halgren et al., 1994; Smith et al., 1986 (intracranial macro-electrode avTL recordings) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | distinguishes-from → scalp and macroelectrode recordings, which cannot resolve whether sustained activity is one process or several Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHAT THE MEASUREMENT CAN RESOLVE, NOT WHAT HAPPENED. 'Quotation withheld.' Two accounts that predict the same recording, separated by an instrument nobody has - the missing-experiment shape, stated as a resolution limit. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → the canonical cortical circuit, in which a middle-layer sink is followed by a superficial one across modalities and species Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | confirms → the repetition suppression of firing reported in macaque temporal cortex and of haemodynamic activity in humans Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | reconciles → the opposite polarities recorded above and below the ventral temporal surface, by deriving both from one laminar pattern Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → the assumption that a fixed relationship holds between synaptic currents, spikes and haemodynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE TIME WINDOW. 'The repetition-induced decrease in IT and PR reported here Quotation withheld.' The fixed relationship between synaptic currents and spiking is qualified for one epoch and left standing for the rest. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the guinea pig laminar result that the initial sink is monosynaptic and the later one polysynaptic, to human word processing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | sink —part-of→ layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: AND TWO MEASURES REMOVE AN AMBIGUITY NEITHER REMOVES ALONE: the sink says where, the SIMULTANEOUS FIRING says it is excitatory
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span localizes the initial sink to middle layers; part-of 'layer' is loose. | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | entorhinal —causes→ retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span is cut before entorhinal activity is linked to retrieval. also in: entorhinal · retrieval | concept_edges[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EPSC —operationalised-as→ sink Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: a phasic middle-layer current first, then long-lasting ones first in the middle and later in the superficial layers
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span interprets the sink as reflecting EPSCs; operationalised-as is loose. | concept_edges[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | CSD —causes→ MEG Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: A FORWARD MODEL THAT JOINS THREE INSTRUMENTS: the laminar pattern is used to PREDICT the surface potential, positive near 200 ms, variable near 400, negative near 600 | concept_edges[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | column —operationalised-as→ CSD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says column ERPs can be estimated from laminar CSD; operationalised-as is loose. | concept_edges[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | distance —causes→ CSD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE SAME-COLUMN CLAIM IS LICENSED BY A SIMULATED DECAY CONSTANT: tenfold in about 250 micrometers
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says CSD declines steeply with distance; the edge carries no direction. | concept_edges[38] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | repetition —causes→ firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. holds when: regardless of whether repetition was task-relevant; the effect was largest when repetition was implicit · direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the effect is LARGEST when the repetition is implicit, presumably because encoding was deeper then also in: repetition · firing | concept_edges[41] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | one-sample t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: one-sample t-test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | statistical-significance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: statistical-significance | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | CSD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CSD | content_tags.statistics[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | simulations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: simulations | content_tags.statistics[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | In all tasks, word-evoked activity began with a sharp current sink in putative layer IV arising abruptly from baseline. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Evoked activity was identical to new and old words for the first ~100 ms. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Repetition effects appeared only from ~220 ms onward, as a prolongation of the layer IV sink to new words. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Repetition suppressed the layer IV synaptic sink in IT and the deep-layer firing in PR. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Entorhinal cortex showed the opposite sign of effect: synaptic currents and firing were larger to repeated words. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Entorhinal current sinks were much smaller during learning than during retrieval. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Multiple processing stages over hundreds of ms are generated within the same IT, PR and EC microdomains, roughly the size of a cortical column. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Simultaneously increasing multi-unit firing showed that the recorded current sinks are excitatory synaptic currents rather than passive returns of an inhibitory current elsewhere. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The MUA response in the visuomotor task was a brief decrease from baseline, while during word recognition it was a prolonged increase. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Repetition effects in PR were similar whether repeated words were recognition targets or incidental to a size-judgment task. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | different extrinsic and associative inputs target different cortical layers, which is what makes layer resolution into stage resolution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the initial sink begins about 120 ms and peaks about 170, and the focus alternates between middle and superficial layers until about 800 ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND TWO MEASURES REMOVE AN AMBIGUITY NEITHER REMOVES ALONE: the sink says where, the simultaneous firing says it is excitatory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | repetition does NOT affect the initial middle-layer sink and DOES decrease the later activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THREE AMBIGUITIES IN THE STANDARD MEASURE, ENUMERATED: one process or several too close to resolve, inhibition or excitation, and which presynaptic cell Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THREE REASONS THE CROSS-SPECIES COMPARISON CANNOT SETTLE THE DISPUTE: different measures, no language in macaques, and evolutionary expansion of the areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE CORTICAL LAYER IS THE INFERENCE: since the two modes involve different layers, the laminar data lead to hypotheses about which is active Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with repetition studied both overtly and implicitly, embedded inside a semantic task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE SAMPLE WAS CHOSEN BY SOMEONE ELSE'S PURPOSE: targets and duration decided entirely on clinical grounds without reference to this experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | OPPOSITE-SIGNED EFFECTS IN ADJACENT STRUCTURES: repetition suppresses the lateral areas and enhances the medial one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a phasic middle-layer current first, then long-lasting ones first in the middle and later in the superficial layers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same pattern is seen for visual, somatosensory and auditory input in animals, which is what makes the circuit canonical Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with the animal work supplying the reading - initial sink monosynaptic, later sink polysynaptic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND THE DELAY FOR THE SINK TO RISE FROM MIDDLE TO UPPER CORTICAL LAYERS WAS AS LONG AS ~500 ms in the current study, whereas in human interictal spikes it is ~20ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | two or three sinks are present at once in the medial structure, whose superficial and deep layers are separated by a cell-free lamina Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with the model systems declared possibly unable to reproduce it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A FORWARD MODEL THAT JOINS THREE INSTRUMENTS: the laminar pattern predicts a positive surface peak near 200 ms, a variable one near 400 and a negative one near 600 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE SIGN OF A PUBLISHED COMPONENT DEPENDS ON WHICH SIDE OF THE TISSUE THE ELECTRODE IS, and one laminar pattern explains both Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND THE PREDICTION HOLDS: three methods at three scales give a consistent multi-resolution view of the same component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND THE EARLIER RESULTS SURVIVE A RIVAL READING, because fields from different sources superimpose Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE SAME-COLUMN CLAIM IS LICENSED BY A SIMULATED DECAY CONSTANT: tenfold in about 250 micrometers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and other structures are active throughout, so the column is one participant in an extended network Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the repetition effect was largest when repetition was implicit, presumably because encoding was deeper Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE RELATION BETWEEN TWO MEASURES IS NOT FIXED: the sustained response carries the effects here, the phasic one in another area, so the relationship may vary between tasks and location Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | anteroventral temporal lobe (avTL) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: anteroventral temporal lobe (avTL) | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | CSD analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CSD analysis | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | population neuronal firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: population neuronal firing | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | current sink Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: current sink | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | N400 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: studies typically find - THE SUBJECT OF THIS RESULT IS AN INDEFINITE STUDY, NOT THIS PAPER. 'Previous studies reported', 'studies in guinea pig showed', 'recent studies have reported' - somebody else's work under a common noun rather than a name, with a citation in the sentence and no first-person marker. The quote is verbatim and the claim is true; only the attribution is wrong. FOUND BY MEASURING MY OWN CUE'S RECALL: the first sweep required a NAMED author as the subject ('Sperling (1960) demonstrated') and found 17. Reading eleven citation-bearing findings on 'Plakke2016' by hand showed four the cue could not see - 'A study examining recognition found', 'studies of typical human subjects have demonstrated', 'A follow up study found' - so the named cue's 17 was a floor and not a count. A CUE'S FALSE POSITIVES TELL YOU NOTHING ABOUT ITS FALSE NEGATIVES, and the only way to find these was to read a record's whole layer. also in: N400 | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ‘countercurrent’ pattern Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ‘countercurrent’ pattern | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | CSD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CSD | content_tags.definitions[6] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sink Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sink | content_tags.definitions[7] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | N400 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: N400 | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | column Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: column | content_tags.definitions[9] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cortical layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cortical layer | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | CSD Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CSD | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | population neuronal firing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: population neuronal firing | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sink Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sink | content_tags.variables[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | latency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: latency | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | polarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: polarity | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | repetition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 111 of 120 — repeating words correctly detected by patient 2 in the Word Recognition task, at a mean reaction time of 762 ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~120ms — latency at which the laminar response first differed significantly from baseline Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ten fold in ~250μm — simulated fall-off of CSD amplitude with distance, the basis for claiming column-level localization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~250μm — the distance over which the signal falls tenfold - the simulated constant that licenses calling multiple stages properties of one column Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ~500 ms — the delay for the sink to rise from middle to upper cortical layers in the current study, whereas in human interictal spikes it is ~20ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ~120ms — the onset of the initial middle-layer sink, peaking near 170 ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.