standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 6 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | what the receptive fields of a genetically defined inhibitory cell class actually look like, as opposed to what is inferred from blocking inhibition wholesale Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether and how the response properties of PV+ neurons differ from those of PV- neurons in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | auditory cortical PV+ neurons are well tuned for frequency, unlike their visual cortical counterparts, which is what the local-pooling account predicts given tonotopy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | frequency tuning of parvalbumin-positive interneurons in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | PV+ cells densely sample a small radius, so their tuning should mirror how the local network is organised - broad where tuning is salt-and-pepper, narrow where it is columnar Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | cotuned inhibition sharpens spike tuning through a thresholding or iceberg mechanism rather than by suppressing non-preferred stimuli Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | very short PV+ latencies suggest a feedforward inhibitory network driven rapidly by thalamocortical excitation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | monotonic PV+ rate-level functions support local inhibition shaping intensity tuning in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the pooling and feedforward roles could be performed in sequence, or simultaneously for continuous sounds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Not every stimulus set could be run on every cell, so the sub-samples for tuning curves, rate-level functions and latency differ. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison between the tuning-curve, rate-level and other sub-samples: DUE TO THE CONSTRAINTS OF RECORDING DURATION, WE WERE NOT ABLE TO PRESENT ALL STIMULUS ARRAYS FOR ALL CELLS | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The PV− comparison group is only presumed to be excitatory; a small fraction could be non-PV inhibitory interneurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the comparison group in every PV+ versus PV- result: PRESUMABLY, THESE PV- CELLS WERE ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY EXCITATORY PYRAMIDAL CELLS, ALTHOUGH A SMALL FRACTION (<12%) COULD HAVE BEEN PV- INHIBITORY INTERNEURONS | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The observed heterogeneity of PV+ response properties may partly reflect limited specificity of the PV promoter rather than true biological diversity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the reported heterogeneity of PV+ responses: it is LIKELY DUE AT LEAST IN PART TO THE DEGREE OF SPECIFICITY OF THE PV PROMOTER, WHICH EXPRESSES IN MORE THAN ONE CELL TYPE | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | well tuned PV+ cells are also consistent with selective connectivity rather than unbiased pooling, though that would be a different rule from other cortical areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the unbiased-pooling interpretation: WELL TUNED PV+ NEURONS ARE ALSO CONSISTENT WITH SELECTIVE CONNECTIVITY RATHER THAN UNBIASED POOLING, BECAUSE NARROW TUNING COULD FOLLOW FROM EITHER SCHEME | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | lateral inhibition could still operate here, either through a different network configuration or through other inhibitory cell types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the negative conclusion about lateral inhibition: LATERAL INHIBITION COULD STILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN AUDITORY CORTEX IN AT LEAST TWO WAYS | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | a small fraction of the PV- sample could have been non-PV inhibitory interneurons rather than pyramidal cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - the PV- sample is defined by absence of a label, with a bound of under 12% on the contamination | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | recording duration prevented presenting every stimulus array to every cell, so the two samples are only approximately matched Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - stimuli PRESENTED TO OUR PV- SAMPLE WERE APPROXIMATELY MATCHED TO THE PV+ SAMPLE, not identically matched | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | deep-layer neurons were slightly underrepresented relative to the anatomical distribution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the laminar generality of the PV+ results: NEURONS IN DEEP LAYERS WERE SLIGHTLY UNDERREPRESENTED IN OUR SAMPLE, though the depth distributions DID NOT DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the unbiased local pooling principle, carried across modalities as a prediction that reverses because auditory cortex is columnar where mouse V1 is not Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the monotonicity index and rate-level function decomposition, used to give intensity tuning a single number Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| controls | rate-level functions NORMALISED before comparison Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the higher baseline firing rate of PV+ neurons as the source of the difference - without it, a cell type that simply fires more would appear to have a different rate-level relationship · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | PV+ here means a cell that responded to blue light with a reliable short-latency burst, in a mouse where over 97 percent of PV-immunopositive cells carry the opsin - identity by manipulation, validated against a stain in two separate reporter lines Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the FS/RS spike-width cutoff of 0.8 ms was set from THIS dataset, halfway between the two group means, and the paper states there is no consensus value in the literature because it may depend on the recording technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | UNTUNED is a category created because the measure does not apply: a sound-responsive cell with disordered frequency-intensity structure has no meaningful tuning width, so it is labelled rather than fitted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | monotonicity index is a ratio of the response at the loudest tested level to the maximum response, so 1 means no intensity tuning and near zero means strong tuning - the measure carries its own null Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the 80 ms response window was chosen to exclude non-evoked spikes BECAUSE PV+ cells have high spontaneous rates - an analysis choice driven by one of the very differences under study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: extracellular single-unit recording with optogenetic identification by light response, Gaussian fits to iso-intensity tuning curves and split-Gaussian fits to rate-level functions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: frequency tuning widths of PV+ and PV- neurons that do not differ, with very tightly tuned PV+ cells uncommon Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: frequency tuning of parvalbumin-positive interneurons in auditory cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → Wu et al. (2008), FS cells in rat A1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → local-pooling account of PV+ tuning (Kerlin et al., 2010; Hofer et al., 2011) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Atencio and Schreiner (2008), FS cells in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → lateral inhibition models in which sharpening comes from inhibitory neurons more broadly tuned than excitatory ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → the cotuning model in which excitation and inhibition share frequency tuning and inhibition sharpens by thresholding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the local unbiased pooling account of PV+ tuning developed in mouse visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the use of extracellular spike waveform as a marker for PV+ interneurons in vivo Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → pharmacological and voltage-clamp studies that lump all sources of synaptic inhibition together Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | PV+ —contrasted-with→ visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the same cell class gives OPPOSITE tuning answers in two modalities, and that is the result rather than a discrepancy
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but auditory PV+ neurons are contrasted WITH PV+ neurons IN visual cortex; 'visual cortex' as the endpoint drops the cell type. also in: PV+ · visual cortex | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | local pooling —causes→ tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: MECHANISM: dense sampling of a small radius means the cell inherits whatever tuning organisation that radius has - so a tonotopic area predicts well-tuned inhibitory cells
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the local pooling HYPOTHESIS PREDICTS similar tuning, and the data were consistent; causes is hedged. also in: local pooling · tuning width | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | waveform —distinct-from→ PV+ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE PROXY MEASURED AGAINST A GENETIC GROUND TRUTH AND FOUND WANTING: up to 40 percent misclassification from any single waveform measure | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | FS —distinct-from→ PV+ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the two are heterogeneous populations that OVERLAP BUT ARE NOT IDENTICAL - so results reported for one do not transfer to the other | concept_edges[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | PV+ —part-of→ basket cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.5 — the record marks this weak · note: and only approximately half of basket cells express PV, which is the second reason the waveform proxy cannot work
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but PV is expressed in only about half of basket cells; part-of is loose and runs the other way. also in: PV+ · basket cells | concept_edges[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | untuned —distinct-from→ tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE MEASURE HAS A DOMAIN: a sound-responsive cell with disordered structure gets a label rather than a number also in: untuned · tuning width | concept_edges[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon rank-sum test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon rank-sum test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Fisher's exact test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Fisher's exact test | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | curve fitting (Gaussian) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: curve fitting (Gaussian) | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | goodness of fit / coefficient of determination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | resampling (random subsampling of trials) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | parametric model fitting Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: parametric model fitting | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon rank sum test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon rank sum test | content_tags.statistics[10] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test | content_tags.statistics[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Frequency tuning width did not differ significantly between optogenetically identified PV+ interneurons and PV- neurons in mouse auditory cortex (0.84 vs 0.62 octaves). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Very tightly tuned cells (below 0.5 octaves) were about half as common among PV+ cells (29%) as among PV- cells (58%), even though the two distributions largely overlapped. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The best frequency of every tuned PV+ neuron was within half an octave of its recording site's best frequency, so PV+ tuning matched the local population. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | PV+ cells responded to best-frequency tones roughly 11 ms earlier than PV- cells (17.9 vs 29.1 ms). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The latency advantage was stimulus-specific: for white noise, PV+ and PV- latencies did not differ significantly. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | PV+ cells had twofold higher spontaneous firing rates than PV- cells (5.5 vs 2.0 Hz), and higher evoked rates. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | After normalizing for their higher firing rates, PV+ cells had shallower response gain to characteristic-frequency tones than PV- cells (0.04 vs 0.15). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | PV+ cells were markedly less intensity-tuned than PV- cells for tones at characteristic frequency: only 14% of PV+ cells were nonmonotonic compared with 55% of PV- cells. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | For white noise, PV+ and PV- neurons did not differ significantly in monotonicity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Classifying cells by extracellular spike waveform instead of by PV expression would misclassify as many as 40% of them, so waveform is an unreliable marker of PV+ identity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The classification method changes the scientific conclusion: sorting the same cells by spike width rather than PV expression made narrow-spike cells come out significantly more broadly tuned than broad-spike cells (0.87 vs 0.60 octaves). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The PV+/PV- differences reported across all layers held within each laminar group as well. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | frequency tuning widths of PV+ and PV- cells were not significantly different, as the local pooling account predicts for a tonotopic area Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | very tightly tuned PV+ cells were comparatively rare, which fits pooling over locally diverse tuning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE PREDICTION WAS DERIVED BEFORE THE TEST: if unbiased pooling generalises across modalities, PV+ cells should be well tuned here because auditory cortex has frequency columns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the same principle explains why PV+ cells are broadly tuned in mouse V1, which lacks orientation columns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the tag was quantified in both directions and in two reporter lines: over 97 percent of PV-stained cells carried the opsin, and over 97 percent of reporter cells stained for PV Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A CONTAMINATION BOUND COMPUTED RATHER THAN ASSERTED: from under 1 percent pyramidal-morphology reporter cells and 24 of 68 recordings in layer V, the sample is estimated to contain fewer than 0.24 pyramidal neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | PV+ cells did have narrower spikes, 0.75 against 0.93 ms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | but the distributions overlapped on every waveform measure: 27 of 72 PV- cells had narrow spikes, 29 had negative endslopes, 17 had low peak/trough ratios Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE PROXY QUANTIFIED AND REJECTED: any single waveform measure could misclassify up to 40 percent, and PV+ and FS are overlapping but non-identical populations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and there is no consensus spike-width cutoff in the literature, because it may depend on the recording technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | two reasons the proxy cannot work: extracellular duration depends on cell size and electrode position, and even intracellularly the fast-spiking to PV relation is not one to one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SOME CELLS GOT A LABEL INSTEAD OF A NUMBER: a sound-responsive neuron whose Gaussian fit was poor was categorized as untuned rather than given a tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the untuned criterion was declared arbitrary and varying it by plus or minus 0.2 did not change the result Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | further cells were dropped when best frequency exceeded the speaker range, leaving 31 PV+ and 34 PV- for tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | NO A PRIORI LATENCY CONSTRAINTS, and imposing several exclusion criteria afterwards did not change the results Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the latency result was confirmed with an alternative estimation method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | PV+ neurons had markedly faster response latencies, read as feedforward inhibition driven by thalamocortical excitation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | PV+ rate-level functions were more monotonic at characteristic frequency, supporting a role in shaping intensity tuning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | STIMULUS-DEPENDENT: for white noise, gain, dynamic range and monotonicity did not separate the two classes at all Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the broadly-tuned-inhibition version of lateral inhibition is inconsistent with equal tuning widths Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the far-projecting version is inconsistent with PV+ tuning matching the local field potential and with equal connectivity spread Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | so the results favour cotuning with only moderate impact on frequency tuning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | though lateral inhibition remains possible through a different network configuration or through other inhibitory cell types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[34] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A DISSOCIATION BETWEEN THE GENETIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CLASSES: tuning was equal for PV+ and PV- but slightly broader for FS cells, hinting at two distinct inhibitory networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[35] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | well tuned PV+ cells would also follow from selective connectivity, which the data cannot exclude Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[36] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the recorded depth distribution matched the anatomical one, with deep layers slightly underrepresented Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[37] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | monotonicity index (MI) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: monotonicity index (MI) | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | characteristic frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: characteristic frequency | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | response gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response gain | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | endslope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: endslope | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | monotonicity index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: monotonicity index | content_tags.definitions[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | untuned Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: untuned | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FS | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cotuning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cotuning | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frequency tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency tuning width | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | response latency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response latency | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sound-evoked firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sound-evoked firing rate | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | maximal evoked firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: maximal evoked firing rate | content_tags.variables[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | depth distributions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: depth distributions | content_tags.variables[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | tuning width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tuning width | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spike width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spike width | content_tags.variables[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | latency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: latency | content_tags.variables[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | n = 68 — PV+ interneurons identified in vivo by their short-latency responses to blue light Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | More than 97% — proportion of PV-immunostained cells that expressed the ChR2-eYFP optogenetic tag (expression specificity) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 31 PV+ and 34 PV− — cells surviving the tuning-curve exclusion criteria and entering the tuning-width analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.75 ± 0.18 ms / 0.93 ± 0.29 ms — mean extracellular spike width of PV+ versus PV- cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | up to 40% — misclassification rate incurred by identifying PV+ cells from any single extracellular waveform measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | σ = 0.17 octaves to σ = 2.3 octaves — full range of measured frequency tuning widths across the 65 analysed cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.76 ± 0.22 / 0.55 ± 0.28 — mean monotonicity index at characteristic frequency for PV+ versus PV- cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 21.1 ± 18.3 Hz / 8.6 ± 6.5 Hz — firing-rate dynamic range of PV+ versus PV- rate-level functions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 32 ± 18 dB / 19 ± 15 dB — sound-level dynamic range over which firing rate kept increasing, PV+ versus PV- Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | up to 40% — misclassification rate from separating cells by any single waveform measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.8 ms — the fast-spiking cutoff, set from this dataset because the literature has no consensus value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | <0.24 pyramidal neurons — computed expected contamination of the 68-cell PV+ sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.75 ± 0.18 ms and 0.93 ± 0.29 ms — PV+ and PV- spike widths; PV+ cells indeed had narrower spikes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 27/72 — PV- cells that would have been called fast-spiking on spike width alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 31 PV+ and 34 PV− — cells surviving both exclusions for the tuning width comparison, from 68 and 72 recorded Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.