standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 7 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the spatial arrangement of vertical cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus with respect to frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether vertical cells and their projections are tonotopically organised in the intact mammalian brain, which had been inferred but never directly shown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | converts an inference drawn from indirect evidence into a direct quantitative demonstration in 3D, and shows the arrangement is aligned to auditory nerve innervation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | tonotopic organisation of dorsal cochlear nucleus vertical cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | retrograde labelling from a physiologically characterised AVCN site gives every labelled DCN cell an inherited BF, since the injection site's BF is measured and the cell's is not Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | normalising every case into one 3D template lets cells from separate animals be merged into a single dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | dendrites and local axons stay within an isofrequency sheet defined by the incoming auditory nerve fibres, so inhibition lands on matched frequencies Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a disynaptic tuberculoventral pathway whose delay is set by conduction velocity plus one synapse, proposed for echo suppression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | near-BF inhibition of type IV units follows from vertical cell axons ramifying inside a single isofrequency slab Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | glycinergic inhibition sharpens spike timing in bushy and T-stellate cells on different timescales Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | BF confirmed by an automated 4-octave sweep at 20 dB above threshold, sampled every 1/25 octave Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Retrograde filling was incomplete, so cells could only be characterised from the soma and primary dendrites rather than the full dendritic arbor. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every morphological characterisation: OUR RETROGRADE FILLS WERE INSUFFICIENT TO REVEAL THE FULL DENDRITIC ARBORIZATION OF EACH NEURON, SO MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS HAD TO BE BASED PRIMARILY UPON THE SOMA AND PRIMARY PROCESSES | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Injection size, a possible confound for the cell counts, could not be measured reliably. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison of cell counts across injections: QUANTIFYING THE SIZE OF AN INJECTION SITE IS NOTORIOUSLY DIFFICULT DUE TO THE AMBIGUITY IN DETERMINING THE EDGE OF THE EFFECTIVE UPTAKE REGION | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The functional role of vertical cells is not settled by these anatomical results and needs further data. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any functional claim about vertical cells: MORE DATA ARE NEEDED TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE FUNCTION OF THESE NEURONS | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the size of an injection site cannot be quantified because the edge of the effective uptake region is ambiguous Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - injection size is not reliably quantifiable | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | apparent injection size is further distorted by photobleaching and exposure time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the apparent injection size specifically: THE APPARENT SIZE OF A FLUORESCENT INJECTION SITE IS SUBJECT TO THE EFFECTS OF PHOTOBLEACHING AND EXPOSURE TIME WHEN COLLECTING IMAGES | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | retrograde fills were incomplete, so morphology had to be judged from soma and primary processes alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - soma and primary processes only | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | some cells labelled at the wrong end of the frequency axis are attributed to axons of passage, an artifact of the tracer method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the low-frequency cells found after high-BF injections: THIS RESULT IS LIKELY DUE TO THE LABELING OF AXONS OF PASSAGE | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the excess of low-BF cells is left explicitly unexplained rather than resolved Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the low-BF labelling asymmetry, quantified and left open: LOW BF INJECTIONS TENDED TO LABEL MORE VERTICAL CELLS THAN HIGH BF INJECTIONS (R2 = 0.32, P < 0.003), THOUGH THE REASON FOR THIS TONOTOPIC FEATURE IS UNCLEAR | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the function of these neurons is still open; the anatomy does not settle it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[2] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] - the anatomy does not settle the function | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | 21 mice, 19 of them female, with no analysis by sex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any sex-general reading of the results: TWENTY-ONE ADULT CBA/J MICE (2 MALE, 19 FEMALE), with no analysis by sex | limitations[9] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | image levels and colour were adjusted per case, defended on the ground that the analysis used position and not luminance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the image-based measurements: LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS AND COLOR ENHANCEMENTS WERE APPLIED TO BRING OUT WEAK SIGNALS, defended because OUR ANALYSIS FOCUSED ON THE LOCATION OF LABELED PIXELS rather than their intensity | limitations[10] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | a frequency model built from AN innervation by cochlear origin, imported as an external criterion against which cell positions are predicted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the pinna transfer function and the frequency range of spectral notches, used to explain an anatomical cell-count gradient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the tonotopic finding corroborated by independently constructing a three-dimensional surface of the deep layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a pattern that exists only in the projection or sectioning used to find it - the 3D reconstruction is built from the same tissue by a different route · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | type II electrophysiological response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[4] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| senses | tonotopic and cochleotopic are used here as TWO DIFFERENT organisations that are compared - the arrangement of cell BFs versus the arrangement of auditory nerve input by cochlear origin; their alignment is the paper's result, so the terms cannot be synonyms in this paper Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | BF, for a vertical cell, is not measured at that cell; it is inherited from the physiologically characterised AVCN injection site that labelled it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | type II names a response category, used throughout as a proxy for a cell class on the strength of a presumed identification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | vertical names the dendritic orientation, not the cell's position - the arbors follow the perpendicular axis through the layered DCN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | isofrequency sheet or slab - a plane of cells sharing a frequency, the unit in which this circuit is organised Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | method: physiologically targeted retrograde tracer injections in AVCN, cells reconstructed and normalised into a shared 3D template of the cochlear nucleus, then assessed by PCA, multiple regression and comparison to an independent frequency model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: tonotopy in a brainstem interneuron population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: tonotopic organisation of dorsal cochlear nucleus vertical cells — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Muniak et al., 2013 (normalised 3D template and quantitative frequency model of the mouse cochlear nucleus) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Lorente de Nó (1981) and subsequent morphological descriptions of vertical cells (Webster and Trune, 1982; Saint Marie et al., 1991; Zhang and Oertel, 1993; Rhode, 1999) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | converts-to-direct-evidence → the standing inference from physiology and slice anatomy that vertical cells are tonotopically organised Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → Wickesberg and Oertel: on-BF inhibition of bushy and stellate cells in AVCN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → Muniak et al. 2013: the AN-derived frequency model of the cochlear nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → reports restricting vertical cells to the lower half of the deep layer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → Spirou et al.: cells sharing a frequency in the DCN are organised into slabs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → Lorente de No's morphological account of vertical cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | vertical cells —same-as→ tuberculoventral cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: alternate names in one clause, unhedged also in: vertical cells · tuberculoventral cells | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | vertical cells —part-of→ DCN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: vertical cells · DCN | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | vertical cells —causes→ type II electrophysiological response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: presumed source of - an identification the field treats as settled but the paper hedges; causes rather than same-as because a cell is not a response
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but vertical cells are the 'PRESUMED source' of the type II response; causes is hedged. | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | type II electrophysiological response —causes→ type IV response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.75 · note: partially shaping; the weight carries the partially | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | BF —operationalised-as→ automated tuning curve protocol Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: BF · automated tuning curve protocol | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | tonotopic organization —operationalised-as→ principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: one of four independent operationalisations of the same claim in this paper | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | tonotopic organization —operationalised-as→ multiple regression analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 | concept_edges[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | multiple regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiple regression | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | coefficient of determination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coefficient of determination | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis | content_tags.statistics[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | multiple regression analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiple regression analysis | content_tags.statistics[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | difference error in octaves Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: difference error in octaves | content_tags.statistics[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SD of BF prediction errors Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SD of BF prediction errors | content_tags.statistics[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Vertical cells labelled from low-best-frequency AVCN injections lie in the anteroventral DCN and those labelled from high-best-frequency injections lie in the posterodorsal DCN, so vertical cells are tonotopically arranged. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A single spatial axis captures three quarters of the positional variance, so the frequency arrangement of vertical cells is essentially one-dimensional. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A linear equation predicting log best frequency from the three normalised spatial coordinates fitted the data closely. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Best frequencies predicted for each vertical cell from auditory-nerve innervation suggest vertical cell tonotopy is closely matched to the peripheral input map. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Only 11.8% of labelled vertical cells lay outside the reconstructed deep-layer boundary. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Injections at low best frequencies labelled more vertical cells than high-frequency injections, an unexplained asymmetry in cell numbers across the frequency axis. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The number of labelled vertical cells was not explained by injection size, because the extent of cochlear labelling correlated poorly with cell counts. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Pairs of vertical cells further apart in space tended to differ more in best frequency, though the relationship was moderate. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | vertical cell position varies with frequency along an anteroventral to posterodorsal axis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the first principal component accounts for 75% of the variance, so the arrangement is essentially one-dimensional Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | BF is predicted from 3D position with R2 = 0.87 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | an independent AN-derived frequency model predicts each cell's BF with R2 = 0.88 and near-zero mean error Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | several quantitative approaches converge on the same conclusion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 88.2% of labelled cells fall inside the independently reconstructed deep-layer surface Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cell counts fall as BF rises, and the paper cannot explain it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cases with more labelled cells show no wider spread of BF prediction error Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cells further apart in space differ more in BF, but only moderately Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | type II electrophysiological response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spatial envelope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spatial envelope | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | vertical cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: vertical cells | content_tags.definitions[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | type II electrophysiological response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frequency region Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency region | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | body temperature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: body temperature | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | BF Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: BF | content_tags.variables[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Euclidian distance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Euclidian distance | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | medial-lateral coordinate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: medial-lateral coordinate | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | dorsal-ventral coordinate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dorsal-ventral coordinate | content_tags.variables[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | anterior-posterior coordinate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: anterior-posterior coordinate | content_tags.variables[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 75% — share of the variance in normalised vertical cell position captured by the first principal component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | R 2 = 0.87 — fit between best frequency and spatial position in the multiple regression model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | R 2 = 0.88 — agreement between measured best frequencies and those predicted by the independent auditory-nerve frequency model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 11.8% — proportion of labelled vertical cells lying outside the reconstructed deep-layer boundary Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1259 — total number of labelled vertical cells normalised into the 3D DCN model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 48.4 ± 33.1 cells — mean number of vertical cells labelled per injection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 6.2 to 56 kHz — range of best frequencies of the AVCN recording/injection sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.00 ± 0.30 oct. — mean error in octaves between regression-predicted and measured best frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Twenty-one — number of adult CBA/J mice used Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 21 adult CBA/J mice, 2 male and 19 female — the sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 26 recording sites, BFs 6.2 to 56 kHz, thresholds 8.6 to 37.6 dB SPL — the physiologically characterised injection sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 11 to 128 labelled cells per injection, mean 48.4 plus or minus 33.1 — yield per case Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1259 cells — the merged dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 75% of variance on the first principal component — how one-dimensional the arrangement is Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R2 = 0.87, P < 0.0001 — BF against 3D position by multiple regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R2 = 0.88, errors -0.82 to 1.29 oct, mean 0.09 plus or minus 0.28 — accuracy of the independent frequency model's predictions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 11.8%, 148 of 1259, of which 98% lie within 40 microns of the surface — cells outside the independently drawn deep-layer boundary Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R2 = 0.32, P < 0.003 — the unexplained relation between injection BF and cell count Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R = 0.34, P = 0.092 — cochlear labelling spread against cell counts, offered as evidence that injection size did not drive the counts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R2 = 0.0002, P = 0.95 — SD of BF prediction error against cell count - the null that matters here Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 748,356 pairs — cross-injection cell pairs compared for BF against distance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[20] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.