(cid:NN). The PDF this text was extracted from encodes 149 characters in a way that names no letter, so the extractor could not say what they were. The quotes keep them because a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing — the marks are the source’s, not the tagging’s.standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | Ih and HCN channel diversity across inferior colliculus neuron types Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Slice preparation and recording configuration may have biased sampling toward particular GABAergic cell types, so further subclasses may exist. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the completeness of the subclass list: BRAIN SLICE PREPARATION AND RECORDING CONFIGURATIONS MAY HAVE BIASED OUR SAMPLE TOWARD ONE NEURON TYPE | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Low-prevalence GABAergic types could have been missed given the sample size. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that a type is absent: OTHER GABAERGIC NEURON TYPES WITH LOW PREVALENCE (10% OR LOWER) MAY HAVE ESCAPED OUR SAMPLE DUE TO OUR RELATIVELY LOW SAMPLE SIZE | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The current-clamp sag measures used to group cells are only partial proxies for Ih amplitude and kinetics. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the grouping variable itself: THESE TWO PARAMETERS ONLY PARTIALLY CORRELATE WITH Ih AMPLITUDE AND Ih ACTIVATION TIME CONSTANT BUT ALSO DEPEND ON MEMBRANE CAPACITANCE AND THE ACTIVATION OF OTHER VOLTAGE-GATED ION CHANNELS | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The physiological classification alone may not exhaust the GABAergic populations; molecular profiling could split them further. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the physiological classification as a final answer: FURTHER PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OR MOLECULAR PROFILING MAY REVEAL DIFFERENT POPULATIONS OF GABAERGIC IC NEURONS | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The dividing line between the two groups is a chosen value, and the neurons that do not fit it are named in the same sentence. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the two Ih groups as natural kinds: the boundary is an activation time constant chosen by the authors at 235 ms, with two intermediate neurons stated not to follow it | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The inhibitory population is reported as undivided BY THESE MEASUREMENTS, with the authors stating the preparation may have biased the sample toward one type. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the finding that GABAergic IC neurons form a single physiological class: the authors state this holds for these measurements and that the preparation may have biased the sample toward one type | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | A detection floor is stated: cell types at or below 10% prevalence may simply not be in the sample. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the absence of a GABAergic subtype in these data as evidence it does not exist: the authors state types at 10% prevalence or lower may have escaped the sample given its size | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | A measurement is declared biased with its direction named, and then argued not to affect the comparison that rests on it. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the reported time constants for slow-Ih neurons: the authors state Ih was not fully activated at the measurement point, so the taus are underestimates, and argue the group differences survive | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the dorso-ventral extent of each inferior colliculus normalised from zero to one before being divided into five regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: differences in absolute size between animals - without normalising, the same anatomical position falls in different regions in different brains · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | inferior colliculus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: inferior colliculus | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | CIC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CIC | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | activation time constant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: activation time constant | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| senses | neuron type - defined by Ih properties measured in acute slices, with the group boundary set at a chosen activation time constant rather than at an observed discontinuity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | GABAergic neurons - a single undivided population UNDER THESE MEASUREMENTS, which the paper distinguishes from the claim that no further subclasses exist Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | inferior colliculus subdivisions - adopted from an atlas classification based on Nissl staining, not derived from the physiology being reported Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | replicates → Zhao et al. (2011) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: 2026-08-16: FAILED GLYPH INSIDE THIS QUOTE. The staged text reads "are also GAD67(cid:2) and thus GABAergic". (cid:2) IS A SIGN CHARACTER AND I AM NOT ASSERTING WHICH ONE. The sentence's own logic points to a plus - GABAergic neurons are GAD67-positive, and the clause concludes "and thus GABAergic" - but plus and minus are OPPOSITE readings of the same tag, and supplying the sign from domain knowledge would be putting a true outside fact into a quote. Read it as: the cells are GAD67-[sign unreadable in the staged file], which the authors take to establish they are GABAergic. The quote is an exact substring of the staged file; the file is incomplete here, not the tag. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → Ono et al. (2005) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Koch et al. (2004) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Ono et al. (2017) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · CIC —part-of→ inferior colliculus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span cited a classification scheme. This sentence states the containment in the paper's own phrase - 'neurons in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus (CIC)' - which is the anatomy the edge records, with the abbreviation defined in place. — strength of the relation: 1 also in: CIC · inferior colliculus | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | CIC —part-of→ inferior colliculus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint. also in: CIC · inferior colliculus | concept_edges[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Shapiro–Wilk normality test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Shapiro–Wilk normality test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Levene test for equality of variance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Levene test for equality of variance | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:8). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: standard error of the mean | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | curve fitting (single exponential) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: curve fitting (single exponential) | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | curve fitting (Boltzmann function) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: curve fitting (Boltzmann function) | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | curve fitting (double exponential) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5), (cid:6). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: curve fitting (double exponential) | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Every GABAergic inferior colliculus neuron sampled showed a slowly activating hyperpolarization-activated current of moderate amplitude, whereas some excitatory neurons showed a fast-activating, large-amplitude current. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Immunostaining placed the fast-gating HCN1 channel around excitatory neurons and the slow-gating HCN4 channel perisomatically around most inhibitory neurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | GABAergic somata lacked HCN1 labelling. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | About 15% of glutamatergic neurons fired only at stimulus onset, and this pattern always co-occurred with a large, fast Ih. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In contrast to many other brain regions, membrane properties and firing patterns were similar in GABAergic neurons and about a third of the excitatory neurons here. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Only the onset-firing excitatory neurons formed a distinct class; GABAergic neurons were statistically indistinguishable from many excitatory types on membrane properties and Ih. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | HCN1 immunoreactivity showed no systematic dorso-ventral (tonotopic) gradient across the mouse central nucleus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 80% of fast-Ih adapting excitatory neurons showed rebound spiking, whereas few GABAergic or slow-Ih excitatory neurons did. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Firing rate versus injected-current relationships did not differ between GABAergic and any excitatory group. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | GABAergic neurons adapted their spike rate rapidly within the first 200 ms and little thereafter. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 96% of EYFP-positive (GABAergic) neurons carried a perisomatic HCN4 ring. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The onset-firing excitatory neurons' membrane properties resemble those of principal neurons of the lateral and medial superior olive. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Ih current density was indistinguishable between GABAergic and slow-tau excitatory neurons but significantly larger in fast-tau excitatory neurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.findings[12] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | onset firing neuron Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: onset firing neuron | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | adapting firing neuron Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: adapting firing neuron | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | current density Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: current density | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | excitatory neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: RULED, NOT PREVIOUSLY ADJUDICATED. This quote carries an unmapped font glyph and was not covered by the 2026-08-25 ruling, which reached only rows flagged with glyph damage. The same reasoning applies and the same decision follows: THE QUOTE IS NOT EDITED. The unmapped characters are the ones carrying the claim, and no code-to-character table is possible - in one sentence of this corpus the same code is '=' once and 'tau' twice. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job, costed and refused (0 of 114 appendable; a per-record re-stage fixes 21 and breaks 223). Three sibling rows were found ALREADY ruled under this same pass and are untouched. also in: excitatory neurons | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | inhibitory neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: RULED, NOT PREVIOUSLY ADJUDICATED. This quote carries an unmapped font glyph and was not covered by the 2026-08-25 ruling, which reached only rows flagged with glyph damage. The same reasoning applies and the same decision follows: THE QUOTE IS NOT EDITED. The unmapped characters are the ones carrying the claim, and no code-to-character table is possible - in one sentence of this corpus the same code is '=' once and 'tau' twice. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job, costed and refused (0 of 114 appendable; a per-record re-stage fixes 21 and breaks 223). Three sibling rows were found ALREADY ruled under this same pass and are untouched. also in: inhibitory neurons | content_tags.definitions[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | hyperpolarizing voltage steps Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: hyperpolarizing voltage steps | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | adaptation rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: adaptation rate | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | holding potential Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. also in: holding potential | content_tags.variables[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Ih densities Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Ih densities | content_tags.variables[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | activation time constant Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: activation time constant | content_tags.variables[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | half-maximal activation voltage Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: half-maximal activation voltage | content_tags.variables[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 33%, 36%, 25% — share of recorded neurons that were GABAergic with slow Ih, excitatory with fast Ih, and excitatory with slow Ih Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 6% — share of neurons with no detectable Ih, all of them excitatory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:5). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 96% (74 out of 77) — proportion of GABAergic (EYFP-positive) neurons showing a perisomatic HCN4 ring Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 88% — share of inferior colliculus neurons with an adapting firing pattern, irrespective of transmitter type Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 15% — share of glutamatergic neurons showing onset spiking, always paired with large fast Ih Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | P = 0.98 — one-way ANOVA result showing mean firing rates at 200 pA above threshold did not differ across the four neuron groups (115–117 Hz) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5), (cid:6), (cid:8). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. · value source note: The value is written with the paper's own symbol (=). Our copy of the text prints it as '(cid:6)' ('P (cid:6) 0.98'), because the PDF's text layer maps its maths characters to the wrong codes. The value is read from the PDF, page 10. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 69 ± 11 ms vs 167 ± 32 ms — weighted adaptation time constants for GABAergic neurons versus slow-Ih excitatory neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:5), (cid:6), (cid:8). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 235 ms — activation time-constant cutoff used to split excitatory neurons into fast-tau and slow-tau Ih groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:2), (cid:9). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 22–28 days, ~1:1 — age of the mice used for patch-clamp recording and the male/female ratio of the sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | n = 5 — number of inferior colliculi in which HCN1 mean gray value was quantified along the dorso-ventral axis, with no gradient found Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: DAMAGED GLYPHS IN THIS QUOTE: (cid:6). These are raw PDF font glyph indices that leaked out in place of the characters they stand for - usually a mathematical operator. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired: the cid-to-character mapping is defined by the font embedded in that particular PDF, so guessing it would produce a clean and unverifiable quote. Repair needs the source PDF and is a re-staging job. · value source note: The value is written with the paper's own symbol (=). Our copy of the text prints it as '(cid:6)' ('n (cid:6) 5'), because the PDF's text layer maps its maths characters to the wrong codes. The value is read from the PDF, page 5. | content_tags.quantities[9] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.