standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | how engaging in a task, as distinct from selectively attending, changes sound-evoked responses in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | what the neural signature of the non-selective component of attention is in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | shows task engagement suppresses evoked responses in A1 - the opposite sign to selective attention - and proposes suppression as the wakeful baseline on which other modulations are superimposed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | task-engagement suppression of sound-evoked responses in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | thalamic spontaneous rate rises during engagement while thalamic evoked responses do not change Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | synaptic depression at thalamocortical synapses could convert a raised thalamic spontaneous rate into a suppressed cortical evoked response without raising cortical spontaneous rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | suppression concentrates the same stimulus into fewer, harder-firing neurons - the representation becomes sparser by kurtosis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | headphones deliver identical stimuli regardless of the animal's position, so any difference must come from the animal's state Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | suppression correlates with a cell's spontaneous rate, a property independent of the stimulus used Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | synaptic depression is argued to cover the steady-state effects, with other mechanisms left open for the first few stimuli Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[9] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Simultaneous multi-neuron recording meant stimuli could not be matched to each neuron's receptive field. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every response-magnitude comparison: BECAUSE ... WE RECORDED FROM SEVERAL NEURONS SIMULTANEOUSLY, WE COULD NOT OPTIMIZE THE STIMULUS PROPERTIES TO MATCH THE RECEPTIVE FIELD PROPERTIES of the recorded neurons | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The paradigm differs enough from barrel-cortex whisking studies that the two sets of results cannot be compared in detail. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison with the barrel-cortex literature: DIFFERENCES IN THE BEHAVIORAL PARADIGMS USED IN THE PRESENT WORK ... AND THE PARADIGMS USED IN THE BARREL SYSTEM prevent it | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The attentional load of the task was modest, and a harder task might have reduced or reversed the suppression. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the size and sign of the suppression: the attentional load was modest, and a harder task might have reduced or reversed it | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The synaptic and circuit mechanism of the suppression is not established. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the mechanistic reading of the suppression: OUR RESULTS REPRESENT A FIRST STEP TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE SYNAPTIC AND CIRCUIT MECHANISMS - the mechanism is not established here | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the absence of target enhancement is attributed to a modest attentional load, so a harder task might have changed the result Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[2] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2] - the absence of target enhancement is attributed to a modest attentional load, so a harder task might have changed the result | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | a minority of units, 8 of 32, showed the opposite effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the word 'suppression' as a description of the population: A MINORITY SHOWED AN INCREASE (8/32 UNITS). THIS HAD THE EFFECT OF CONCENTRATING THE STIMULUS-EVOKED SPIKES INTO [a] SMALLER POPULATION OF NEURONS | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | suppression interacts with repetition rate and disappears at the highest rates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the stimulus range over which the effect holds: AT ALL BUT THE HIGHEST REPETITION RATES, THE RESPONSES IN THE ENGAGED CONDITION WERE RELATIVELY SUPPRESSED ... THUS SUPPRESSION INTERACTS WITH REPETITION RATE | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the thalamocortical depression account is offered as an explanation that could work, not one that was tested here Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the thalamocortical mechanism: SYNAPTIC DEPRESSION OF THE THALAMOCORTICAL INPUTS COULD EXPLAIN HOW THE RELATIVE ENHANCEMENT ... MIGHT LEAD TO SUPPRESSION - offered, not tested here | limitations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the two intermodal experiments used a harder task and longer training than the main experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison between the intermodal experiments and the main one: WE USED A TONE DISCRIMINATION TASK WHICH WAS SUBSTANTIALLY MORE CHALLENGING (~3 WEEKS TRAINING, PERFORMANCE ~80%) | limitations[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the whisking-versus-quiet suppression in barrel cortex, used as the cross-modal parallel for the same effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | short-term synaptic depression and the inverse relation between release probability and presynaptic rate, imported as the circuit explanation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the tetrodes advanced at least 40 micrometres EVERY DAY Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the same cells being counted as independent observations across sessions - without moving the electrode, a strong effect in one neuron is re-measured daily and the sample size is a fiction · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | attention is split into a well-defined SELECTIVE component and a much less well-defined non-selective one covering arousal, vigilance and sustained attention - and the two have OPPOSITE signs in this cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | engaged is coined here for the non-selective component: performing a task, as against being awake and not performing one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | modulation index is defined twice in this paper with different contents - engaged versus passive in the main experiment, auditory versus olfactory block in the intermodal one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | suppression is proposed not as an effect but as the BASELINE on which other attentional and non-attentional modulations are superimposed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | method: tetrode recording in rat A1 and auditory thalamus across four task variants, comparing engaged and passive conditions with identical headphone-delivered stimuli Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: behavioural-state modulation of sensory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: task-engagement suppression of sound-evoked responses in auditory cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → prior studies reporting increased spontaneous activity with task engagement (cited as reference 19) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → rat barrel cortex whisking-versus-quiet-wakefulness studies (cited as references 37–39) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the expectation that engagement, like selective attention, enhances cortical responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the account of neural activity as a resource allocated in greater measure with increasing arousal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → studies reporting increased spontaneous activity with task engagement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → barrel cortex reports of suppression during whisking relative to quiet wakefulness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | distinguishes-from → sleep and anaesthesia, which have their own distinct signatures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE SIGNATURE EACH STATE LEAVES. 'Spontaneous and evoked cortical activity showed A CHARACTERISTIC NEURAL SIGNATURE UNDER EACH CONDITION: SPONTANEOUS CORTICAL ACTIVITY WAS REDUCED IN THE LESS AROUSED STATES (SLEEP AND ANESTHETIZED) compared with the awake but passive condition.' Task engagement is distinguished from sleep and anaesthesia not by the direction of the effect on evoked responses - which can look alike - but by what happens to SPONTANEOUS activity at the same time. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | engaged —distinct-from→ selective attention Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: OPPOSITE IN SIGN in the same cortex - the sharpest sign contrast in the corpus, and the reason the construct has to be split also in: engaged · selective attention | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | synaptic depression —causes→ auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: could explain - proposed, not tested here
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but synaptic depression 'COULD EXPLAIN' suppression of the cortical evoked response; causes is hedged and 'auditory cortex' drops the response. also in: synaptic depression · auditory cortex | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | engaged —distinct-from→ arousal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: argued from the SIGN: raised arousal would raise firing, and firing fell
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span argues arousal would not explain the suppression; distinct-from is loose. | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | paired t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: paired t-test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | kurtosis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: kurtosis | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard error of the mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard error of the mean | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Mahalanobis distance (spike-cluster quality metric) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | modulation index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: modulation index | content_tags.statistics[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | kurtosis of the firing rate distribution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | paired t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: paired t-test | content_tags.statistics[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Engaging in an auditory task suppressed sound-evoked responses in auditory cortex, the opposite sign of the enhancement produced by selective attention. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The suppression of evoked responses occurred with no accompanying change in pre-stimulus spontaneous cortical activity. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Responses to the task-relevant target sound were suppressed as much as responses to the last non-target sound. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Sound-evoked responses during auditory-attention blocks were not suppressed relative to olfactory-attention blocks. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The amount of suppression was unrelated to a neuron's spatial selectivity, frequency selectivity, or the octave distance between its best frequency and the attended frequency. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The authors conclude that the suppression in the engaged condition does not depend on the animal triggering the stimulus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Firing-rate kurtosis rose from 4.1 (passive) to 8.4 (engaged), indicating a sparser stimulus representation during engagement. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In the auditory thalamus engagement left evoked responses unchanged but raised spontaneous firing rates, the opposite pattern to cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Thalamic evoked responses did not differ between engaged and passive conditions (p=0.80). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Sleep and ketamine anesthesia reduced spontaneous cortical activity relative to the awake passive state, giving those low-arousal states a neural signature distinct from passive wakefulness. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Neural activity did not differ between the passive blocks recorded before and after the task, excluding recording drift, satiety and reward expectation as explanations for the suppression. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | task engagement suppressed evoked responses across single units, multiunit activity and LFP Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cortical spontaneous activity did not change, unlike other reports Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | task-relevant target and irrelevant non-target stimuli were suppressed equally Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the representation became sparser, kurtosis 8.4 engaged against 4.1 passive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | no suppression of auditory responses in an auditory block relative to an olfactory block Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | suppression appeared in both blocks relative to passive, so it does not depend on the task's modality Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | suppression was unrelated to spatial selectivity, frequency selectivity or distance from the attended frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same suppression appeared when the animal did not trigger the stimulus, with a nearly identical modulation index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sleep and anaesthesia have their own distinct signatures, with reduced spontaneous activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | in thalamus, spontaneous activity rose during engagement while evoked responses were unchanged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | thalamic burstiness did not change, unlike in sleep or reduced arousal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | modulation index Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: modulation index | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | modulation index range Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: modulation index range | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | kurtosis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: kurtosis | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | isolation distance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: isolation distance | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | selective component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: selective component | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | non-selective component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: non-selective component | content_tags.definitions[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | evoked response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: evoked response | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | thalamic spontaneous firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: thalamic spontaneous firing rate | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | intertrial interval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: intertrial interval | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | repetition rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition rate | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spontaneous firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spontaneous firing rate | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | −0.20 ± 0.03 vs −0.19±0.02 — modulation index of the multiunit evoked response in the head-fixed task compared with the freely moving task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 8.4 ± 2.4 vs 4.1 ± 0.7 — kurtosis of the firing-rate distribution when engaged versus passive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 8/32 units — minority of single units whose evoked activity increased rather than decreased when the animal was engaged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p<1e–16 — significance of the engagement-related suppression for multiunit activity and evoked LFP Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p=0.80 — test of the difference in thalamic evoked response between engaged and passive conditions (no difference) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p<0.001 — significance of the elevation of thalamic spontaneous activity during engagement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 81% / 91% — behavioural accuracy during auditory versus olfactory blocks of the intermodal attention task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | > 95% correct; ~1 week — criterion performance and training time on the two-alternative choice task before electrode implantation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | kurtosis 8.4 plus or minus 2.4 engaged versus 4.1 plus or minus 0.7 passive — sparseness of the representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 8 of 32 units — the minority showing enhancement rather than suppression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | -0.20 plus or minus 0.03 head-fixed versus -0.19 plus or minus 0.02 self-triggered — modulation indices, showing self-triggering does not explain the effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | p = 0.80 — the thalamic evoked-response null Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 80% correct after three weeks versus over 95% after one week — the harder intermodal task against the main task Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.