standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | auditory frequency representations in classically defined somatosensory cortex - whether responses to a non-preferred modality carry specific information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether parietal responses to sound are frequency-selective and related to perception, or merely present Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | frequency-specific auditory responses in parietal cortex whose representational geometry correlates with offline perceptual similarity judgments, surviving conservative erosion of the parieto-temporal border Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | auditory frequency representation in somatosensory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | fmri Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: fmri | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | subgroups of voxels in classically defined somatosensory regions of the parietal lobe respond to audition and are better suited to represent auditory frequency information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | with the proposed route being an extensive history of co-activation at frequencies common to both senses, so that hearing a tone evokes the tactile representation associated with it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | and the association may be feature-specific - frequency shared between the senses where stimulus duration appears to rely on modality-dedicated circuits Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | fMRI's temporal resolution cannot say whether the parietal auditory responses are feedforward or feedback. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the direction of the parietal auditory signal: DUE TO THE LIMITED TEMPORAL RESOLUTION OF fMRI, Quotation withheld | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the task performed during the discrimination scans, designed to ensure that participants attended to stimulus frequency, did not permit a sensitive analysis of auditory discrimination performance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the analysis the discrimination scans could not support: THE TASK ... DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT PARTICIPANTS ATTENDED TO STIMULUS FREQUENCY, DID NOT PERMIT A SENSITIVE ANALYSIS | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | these observations need to be confirmed in ultra-high resolution scanning and single-unit recording experiments testing a more comprehensive range of tones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the whole set of observations: THESE OBSERVATIONS NEED TO BE CONFIRMED IN ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION SCANNING AND SINGLE-UNIT RECORDING EXPERIMENTS TESTING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE RANGE OF TONES | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the perceptual measure is a group average collected offline from mostly different people, because the in-scanner task was not designed to yield a sensitive discrimination measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the brain-to-perception comparison: WE COMPARED THE CORTICAL DISSIMILARITY MEASURES TO THE PERCEPTUAL DISSIMILARITY JUDGMENTS TESTED OFFLINE AND AVERAGED across mostly different people | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | auditory frequency representations in bilateral SR eroded are sensitive to ROI size and voxel inclusion criteria, unlike those in AR eroded which are more robust to the same criteria Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the SR result specifically: AUDITORY FREQUENCY REPRESENTATIONS IN BILATERAL SR ERODED ARE SENSITIVE TO ROI SIZE AND VOXEL INCLUSION CRITERIA, UNLIKE THOSE IN AR ERODED WHICH ARE MORE ROBUST | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the elimination of the cutaneous-activation account rests partly on a comparison whose data are not shown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the cutaneous-activation argument: it rests on a comparison of frequency response profiles whose data are not shown | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | fMRI cannot say whether the parietal auditory responses are feedforward or feedback Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - feedforward against feedback is not resolvable at this temporal resolution | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | and whether frequency is explicitly tuned, temporally coded or topographically arranged in somatosensory cortex is unknown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that somatosensory cortex represents frequency explicitly: EVIDENCE FOR EXPLICIT FREQUENCY TUNING is lacking, even where spike timing can signal vibration above 100 Hz | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the cortical DM calculated for each ROI compared to the group perceptual DM, so that a high correlation indicates the representational geometry of the auditory stimuli in the ROI corresponds to the geometry of the stimuli in perceptual space Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | pairwise similarity ratings, collected outside the scanner and turned into a dissimilarity matrix Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the 100 to 300 Hz range as the band where the two senses overlap, used to predict where parietal responses should stop Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[2] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | temporal coding of vibration frequency in somatosensory cortex, named as the mechanism that would explain the fMRI result and has not been shown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a +/-5 per cent JITTER added to the loudness-matched amplitude of every stimulus presentation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: amplitude as a systematic correlate of frequency - without it, a region that appeared to encode auditory FREQUENCY could be responding to loudness instead, which is the confound the paper's whole claim turns on · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | ROI size → statistical relationship Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. AN ANALYSIS CHOICE THAT MOVES THE RESULT: significant correlations required between 50 and 200 voxels with the tactile mask, and beyond that, including more voxels WEAKENED the relationship. The correlation is not a fixed property; it depends on where the ROI is cut. | unhoused_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| unhoused_relations | cortical and perceptual DMs → postcentral gyrus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. POSITIVE CORRELATION, RESTRICTED: significant only in the postcentral and supramarginal gyri, and only under the auditory mask. The restriction IS the result - an unscoped edge would assert it across parietal cortex, which the span explicitly denies. | unhoused_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| senses | THE REGION'S NAME DOES NOT BOUND WHAT IT PROCESSES: robust and frequency-specific responses to sound in CLASSICALLY DEFINED somatosensory areas, against the traditional notion of modality-dedicated cortical systems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the question is sharpened before the measurement - multimodal responses are NO LONGER DISPUTED, but whether they convey SPECIFIC representations and how they relate to perception are the open questions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | with the precise gap named: auditory stimulation was already known to evoke distinct signatures in somatosensory cortex, and it REMAINED UNCLEAR whether those patterns represent specific auditory information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | WHICH LOCALIZER DEFINED THE VOXELS IS ITSELF THE HYPOTHESIS TEST: separate auditory, tactile and audio-tactile masks, used to ask whether parietal voxels PRIVILEGED in their sensitivity to sound are the ones that carry the representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE ANSWER DEPENDS ON THE MASK: fewer and smaller regions show a frequency effect with the tactile mask, and the paper reads that difference as the result rather than as noise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE SAME DATA ARE SIGNIFICANT OR NULL BY MASK, ONCE SPLIT BY HEMISPHERE: in the left somatosensory ROI the auditory mask gives r = 0.24 P < 0.05, the tactile mask r = 0.07 P = 0.25 and the audio-tactile mask r = 0.1 P = 0.15 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the same split against perception - significant correlations ONLY with the auditory masks, with the tactile left-hemisphere mask at P = 0.07 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE RESULT EXISTS INSIDE A WINDOW OF ANALYSIS SIZE, AND THE WINDOW DIFFERS BY MASK: the auditory mask needs more than 130 voxels, the tactile mask between 50 and 200 - BEYOND WHICH MORE VOXELS WEAKEN IT - and the audio-tactile mask only 300 to 350 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | stated plainly as a limit - the parietal representations are SENSITIVE to ROI size and voxel inclusion criteria where the temporal ones are ROBUST to the same criteria Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | A THRESHOLD CHOSEN FOR ITS ROLE IN THE PIPELINE, NOT FOR INFERENCE: a LIBERAL uncorrected P < 0.05 used to build the masks, precisely because they only constrain later tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE artifact IS ELIMINATED BY A PARAMETRIC SWEEP RATHER THAN ONE CONTROL: ROIs eroded by 2 mm, then 4 mm, then 10 mm - and the auditory-mask result survives all three Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | with four separate design decisions listed against the same confound - 2 mm isotropic voxels, no volumetric smoothing, surface-space filtering, and conservative borders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE SPATIAL ARGUMENT IS TURNED AROUND: the significant parietal subdivisions are NOT the ones closest to auditory cortex, which is what a partial-volume account would have required Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | ONE CONTROL EXPERIMENT ANSWERING TWO DIFFERENT OBJECTIONS: air-conduction headphones show the effect does not need vibrating earbuds, AND that session involved no touch at all, so a learned sound-vibration association cannot explain it either Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the earbud account is refuted by SOMATOTOPY - cutaneous drive in the ear canal would confine the response to the ear representation, and the responses are broadly distributed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | A LOAD-BEARING COMPARISON WHOSE EVIDENCE IS NOT IN THE PAPER: tactile stimulation at matched frequencies gave response profiles that 'clearly differed' from the sound profiles - DATA NOT SHOWN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | TWO NEGATIVE CONTROLS, ONE ACROSS REGIONS AND ONE WITHIN: visual cortex patterns do not correlate with the perceptual geometry, and neither do the voxels that DEACTIVATED in the localizer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE TWO SIDES OF THE CORRELATION COME FROM DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND DIFFERENT SESSIONS: the perceptual judgments were collected offline and averaged over subjects, because the in-scanner task could not yield a sensitive discrimination measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the peak sits at the edge of the tested range - the somatosensory profile is bimodal with a peak at 75 Hz, THE LOWEST TESTED FREQUENCY Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: three independent localizer masks - auditory, tactile, audio-tactile - used to select voxels, so that which mask defines the data becomes itself the hypothesis test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: fmri — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: temporal frequency processing shared by audition and touch, traditionally described as segregated into separate parietal and temporal systems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: auditory frequency representation in somatosensory cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Liang et al. (2013) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Beauchamp and Ro (2008) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the traditional notion of modality-dedicated cortical systems in which frequency processing is segregated into parietal and temporal streams Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → the account that parietal responses to sound reflect auditory processing rather than partial volume contamination, from the erosion sweep Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | distinguishes-from → cutaneous activation by vibrating earbuds, excluded by somatotopy, by frequency profile and by a headphone control experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS A NAMED CONFOUND AND THE EQUIPMENT THAT CREATES IT. 'Quotation withheld.' The alternative explanation is a property of the apparatus, not of the brain - so every study using these headphones inherits it, and only this one says so. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | explains-away → the possibility that the effect is a learned association between sounds and vibrations, since the control session involved no tactile stimulation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → its own perceptual comparison, which is offline, group-averaged and not trial-wise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE GRAIN OF THE COMPARISON. 'Quotation withheld.' A brain-behaviour correspondence established between a within-subject neural measure and a between-subject behavioural one is a weaker claim than it reads as - and the paper opens the paragraph with 'admittedly, our approach can be substantially improved'. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | predicts → that parietal regions respond only to the low frequency range that is also experienced through touch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | somatotopic —part-of→ parietal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span addresses somatotopic parietal responses; part-of is loose. also in: somatotopic · parietal | concept_edges[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | spike timing —operationalised-as→ frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the mechanism that would explain the result and has not been shown - explicit frequency tuning in somatosensory cortex REMAINS ELUSIVE
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says somatosensory neurons signal vibration frequency in spike timing; operationalised-as is loose. also in: spike timing · frequency | concept_edges[39] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | general linear model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: general linear model | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | multiple-comparison correction (false discovery rate) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation (Pearson) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation (Pearson) | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation (Spearman rank) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation (Spearman rank) | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon signed-rank test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon signed-rank test | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | bootstrap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: bootstrap | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | confidence interval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: confidence interval | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | signal detection sensitivity (d-prime) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Dice coefficient (spatial overlap) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Dice coefficient (spatial overlap) | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | representational similarity analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: representational similarity analysis | content_tags.statistics[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon signed-rank tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests | content_tags.statistics[12] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Spearman correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Spearman correlation | content_tags.statistics[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FDR corrected Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FDR corrected | content_tags.statistics[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Pure-tone auditory stimulation produced robust, frequency-specific BOLD responses in classically defined somatosensory areas of the parietal lobe, outside the bilateral temporal lobes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Multi-voxel activation patterns for sound pairs in the parietal lobe showed a similarity structure that correlated significantly with participants' perceptual similarity judgments of the same tones. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Auditory frequency information is therefore distributed across brain regions traditionally treated as dedicated to touch, not confined to auditory cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The parietal auditory representations are not a partial-volume artifact of the neighbouring temporal lobe: they survived even when the region of interest was eroded by 10 mm from the parieto-temporal border. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Within parietal cortex, significant perceptual-cortical correspondences were found only in the postcentral gyrus and supramarginal gyrus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Parietal voxels selected by the auditory localizer carried more robust auditory frequency representations than voxels selected by the tactile or audio-tactile localizers. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The relationship between cortical and perceptual dissimilarity for the tones appears specific to temporal and parietal cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The parietal responses are not driven by the vibrating piezoelectric earbuds mechanically stimulating the ear canal: significant parietal BOLD changes were still obtained with circumaural air-conduction headphones. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Frequency tuning profiles differed between the two regions: both peaked around 200 Hz, but the somatosensory region showed a second, bimodal peak at the lowest tested frequency of 75 Hz. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | robust and frequency-specific responses to auditory stimulation in CLASSICALLY DEFINED somatosensory areas, against the traditional notion of modality-dedicated cortical systems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the parietal similarity patterns correlated significantly with perceptual similarity judgments made outside the scanner Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the question is sharpened first - multimodal responses are NO LONGER DISPUTED, and whether they convey specific representations is the open question Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with the precise gap named: distinct response signatures were known, and it remained unclear whether they REPRESENT specific auditory information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | WHICH LOCALIZER DEFINED THE VOXELS IS ITSELF THE HYPOTHESIS TEST - three masks, asking whether the voxels privileged for sound are the ones that carry the representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A THRESHOLD CHOSEN FOR ITS ROLE IN THE PIPELINE: liberal and uncorrected at P < 0.05, because the masks only constrain later tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE ANSWER DEPENDS ON THE MASK: the differences in the results acquired with the tactile localizer masks compared to the auditory and audio-tactile masks imply that brain regions preferentially responsive to auditory stimulation were more likely to exhibit significant response modulation related to auditory frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE SAME DATA ARE SIGNIFICANT OR NULL BY MASK once split by hemisphere - left somatosensory ROI: auditory r = 0.24 P < 0.05, tactile r = 0.07 P = 0.25, audio-tactile r = 0.1 P = 0.15 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and against perception, significant correlations ONLY with the auditory masks, with the tactile left-hemisphere mask at P = 0.07 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE RESULT EXISTS INSIDE A WINDOW OF ANALYSIS SIZE: the auditory mask needs more than 130 voxels, the tactile mask 50 to 200 beyond which MORE VOXELS WEAKEN IT, the audio-tactile mask only 300 to 350 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | stated as a limit - parietal representations are sensitive to ROI size and voxel inclusion criteria where temporal ones are robust to the same criteria Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE artifact IS ELIMINATED BY A PARAMETRIC SWEEP: ROIs eroded by 2 mm, 4 mm and 10 mm, with the auditory-mask result surviving all three Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with four separate design decisions listed against the same confound - 2 mm isotropic voxels, no volumetric smoothing, surface-space filtering, conservative borders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND THE SPATIAL ARGUMENT IS TURNED AROUND: the significant parietal subdivisions are not the ones closest to auditory cortex, as a partial-volume account would require Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the tactile stimuli were confirmed inaudible - chance performance, 0.49, without physical contact with the stimulator Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the vibrating-earbud account is refuted by SOMATOTOPY - cutaneous drive in the ear canal would confine the response to the ear representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | A LOAD-BEARING COMPARISON WHOSE EVIDENCE IS NOT IN THE PAPER: matched-frequency tactile stimulation gave profiles that clearly differed from the sound profiles, DATA NOT SHOWN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ONE CONTROL EXPERIMENT ANSWERING TWO OBJECTIONS: air-conduction headphones remove the earbud account, and that session involved no touch, removing the learned-association account Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | TWO NEGATIVE CONTROLS, ACROSS REGIONS AND WITHIN: visual cortex patterns do not correlate with the perceptual geometry Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and voxels that DEACTIVATED in the localizer carry no relationship to auditory stimulus frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE TWO SIDES COME FROM DIFFERENT SESSIONS - the cortical dissimilarity measures were compared to perceptual dissimilarity judgments tested offline and averaged over subjects, because the discrimination scans did not permit a sensitive analysis of auditory discrimination performance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | somatosensory ROI dissimilarity against frequency: auditory mask r = 0.40, tactile r = 0.24, audio-tactile r = 0.25, all significant bilaterally Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with the higher somatosensory dissimilarity attributed to noisier patterns, and temporal patterns called qualitatively more reliable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the somatosensory frequency profile is bimodal with a peak at 75 Hz, THE LOWEST TESTED FREQUENCY Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the stimulus set was built to exclude two confounds at once - no harmonically related frequencies, and a 5% jitter on loudness-matched amplitudes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the proposed route is a history of co-activation, with the falsifiable consequence that parietal regions should respond only to the band shared with touch Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[34] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the association may be FEATURE-SPECIFIC - frequency shared between the senses where stimulus duration appears to rely on modality-dedicated circuits Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[35] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | explicit frequency tuning in somatosensory cortex remains elusive, and whether auditory information is carried there by a temporal code is unknown Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[36] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and fMRI's temporal resolution cannot say whether the parietal auditory responses are feedforward or feedback Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[37] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cortical dissimilarity matrix (DM) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cortical dissimilarity matrix (DM) | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | eroded ROI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: eroded ROI | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | somatosensory regions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: somatosensory regions | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | auditory regions of interest Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: auditory regions of interest | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | oddball event Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: oddball event | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | dissimilarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dissimilarity | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | erosion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: erosion | content_tags.definitions[7] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | partial volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: partial volume | content_tags.definitions[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | localizer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: localizer | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | frequency content Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency content | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | perceived similarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perceived similarity | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | stimulus amplitude Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stimulus amplitude | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: frequency | content_tags.variables[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | dissimilarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dissimilarity | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ROI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ROI | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | mask Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mask | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Head motion parameters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Head motion parameters | content_tags.variables[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | drift parameters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: drift parameters | content_tags.variables[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Ten — participants in the main fMRI experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 75, 130, 195, 270, and 355 Hz — the five non-harmonically-related pure tones used as auditory stimuli Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean d ’ = 5.89 — participants' sensitivity in detecting oddball events during the scans Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 37 and 54 clusters — left- and right-hemisphere clusters showing significant auditory responses under the auditory localizer mask Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean r = 0.40, W = 54, P < 0.005 — relationship between frequency distance and activation-pattern dissimilarity in the bilateral somatosensory ROI with the auditory localizer mask Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean r = 0.41, W = 55, P < 0.001 — correlation between the perceptual dissimilarity matrix and the somatosensory-ROI cortical dissimilarity matrix with the auditory mask Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean r = 0.83, W = 21, P < 0.05 — relationship between perceptual similarity ratings and absolute frequency differences between tones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.49 ± 0.012 — chance-level tactile detection rate when subjects had no physical contact with the stimulator, confirming the tactile stimuli were inaudible Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 130 voxels — ROI size the eroded somatosensory region had to exceed before perceptual-cortical correlations reached significance with the auditory mask Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | r = 0.24 ... r = 0.07 ... r = 0.1 — the same somatosensory data analysed with three different localizer masks - one significant, two not, so the mask decides whether there is a finding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 130 ... 50 and 200 ... 300–350 — the ROI sizes at which each mask yields a significant brain-perception correlation, with the tactile mask WEAKENING beyond its window - a result that exists only inside an analysis-size range Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 10 mm — the most extreme erosion of the parieto-temporal border at which the auditory-mask result still holds - a parametric sweep on the artifact rather than a single control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.49 — detection of the tactile stimulator without physical contact - chance, which is what licenses treating the vibrations as inaudible Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 75 Hz — the second peak of the somatosensory frequency profile, and also the lowest frequency tested - so the profile's shape is bounded by the design Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.