standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 8 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | how the human hippocampus divides into functionally distinct parts along its long axis, derived from what the published literature reports rather than from one paradigm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether a comprehensive data-driven parcellation of the hippocampus can be recovered from the coactivation structure of the published record Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a three-cluster parcellation of the left hippocampus with emotional, cognitive and perceptual profiles, and an ambiguous right hippocampus for which both a five-cluster and a two-cluster solution are reported and analysed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | long-axis functional topography of the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | meta-analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: meta-analysis | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | the anterior portion is proposed to handle limbic or hot processing and the posterior spatial navigation and learned associations, a division carried over from rodent dorsal and ventral axes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the right hippocampus may be functionally heterogeneous, which is offered as the reason its cluster solution is less stable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | or the right hippocampus may not be organised by behavioural or stimulus features at all, so that its topography is a gradient rather than a set of parts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | posterior segments connect to the posterior cingulate, a default mode hub, which is read as support for an internal attention account Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The right hippocampal parcellation is underdetermined and needs more data to settle between the 5- and 2-cluster solutions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the right hippocampal segmentation specifically: THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL DATA TO FULLY PARSE THE SEGMENTATION OF THE RIGHT HIPPOCAMPUS | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The right-hemisphere behavioural associations did not survive FDR correction. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the right-hemisphere behavioural associations only: THESE FUNCTIONS DID NOT SURVIVE FDR CORRECTION, THUS THE RIGHT BEHAVIORAL SUBSTRATES ARE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The parcellation inherits the BrainMap database's bias toward cognition-based studies. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the functional coverage of the parcellation: THE DATA ARE RELIANT ON THE BRAINMAP DATABASE, WHICH HEAVILY FAVORS COGNITION-BASED FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING STUDIES | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The 7 T sample is small and more subjects would strengthen the connectivity results. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the connectivity results: ADDITIONAL SUBJECTS MAY HELP TO STRENGTHEN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONNECTIVITY OF THE TOPOGRAPHICAL SEGMENTS | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The method forces discrete clusters and cannot represent a gradient organisation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim that the organisation is discrete: THERE IS A GRADIENT COMPONENT TO PROCESSING WITHIN THE HIPPOCAMPUS THAT OUR CURRENT METHOD CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR | limitations[4] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | segmentation is defined in terms of distinct clusters, and a gradient component is called plausible and likely and beyond what the current method can account for Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[4] - the segmentation is DEFINED IN TERMS OF DISTINCT CLUSTERS, and a gradient is called PLAUSIBLE, AND LIKELY | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the right hippocampal behavioural associations did not survive correction and are explicitly interpreted with caution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - the right behavioural substrates, uncorrected | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the database heavily favours cognition studies, which is representative of the field but may itself be why no obvious right hippocampal solution emerged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2], with the paper's own defence: WHILE THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIELD AS A WHOLE, HAVING A MORE BALANCED database would change what can be found | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | uncovering the right hemisphere's ambiguous results is said to need increasing the number of papers in the BrainMap database, and submillimeter fMRI specifically targeting the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the right hemisphere's ambiguous results, and the subiculum finding in particular: TWO AVENUES OF ADDITIONAL WORK ARE NECESSARY TO UNCOVER THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE'S AMBIGUOUS RESULTS, PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE SUBFIELD (I.E., SUBICULUM) FINDING | limitations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | which of the two right hippocampal solutions is correct is left open until the database grows Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the choice between the two right-hippocampus solutions: WE PRESENTED BOTH A 5-CLUSTER AND A 2-CLUSTER SOLUTION, AS THE 5-CLUSTER SOLUTION WAS DEEMED TO BE MARGINALLY BETTER | limitations[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the imaging validation rests on 23 resting-state and 31 diffusion participants Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the imaging validation: TWENTY-THREE HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS were scanned for resting state, with a separate diffusion sample | limitations[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | activation likelihood estimation against a null of random spatial association, used here to characterise each cluster rather than to test a hypothesis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | behavioral domain, paradigm class and subject population coded alongside the stereotactic coordinates of every archived study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | clustering that separates the voxels in the ROI into k clusters by minimizing the variance within clusters and maximizing the variance between clusters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the dorsal to ventral axis and its hot and cold processing division, mapped onto the human posterior to anterior axis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the resting-state and DTI analyses run twice, with and without the left-handed participants Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: handedness driving a lateralised functional or structural result · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE NUMBER OF PARTS IS A CHOICE, AND THE CRITERIA DISAGREE: misclassified voxels favour 2 to 4 on the left and 2, 3 or 5 on the right; minimum-to-mean cluster size favours 2 and 3 for both; intercluster distance favours 3 on the left and 2 or 5 on the right Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the reported answer is a combination of them - three parts on the left, five on the right - so how many objects the hippocampus contains is a product of how the criteria were weighed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | TWO PARCELLATIONS OF THE SAME STRUCTURE ARE CARRIED THROUGH THE WHOLE PAPER: the five-cluster right solution is called marginally better than the two-cluster one, and both get their own connectivity analyses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE METHOD CAN ONLY RETURN PARTS: k-means assigns every voxel to one of k non-overlapping clusters, so a structure organised as a gradient would still come back as clusters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the paper says exactly that - segmentation into distinct clusters is a definitional choice, a gradient is plausible and likely, and the method cannot account for it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE OBJECT IS DEFINED BY A THRESHOLD ON A PROBABILITY MAP: the region of interest is an atlas thresholded at 75 percent, chosen to be conservative and to be easy to describe to other researchers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE SAME TAGS ARE READ IN BOTH DIRECTIONS: forward inference asks whether a label is more likely to activate this cluster than the database at large, reverse inference asks which label is most likely given activation here Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE CORPUS'S SKEW BECOMES THE ANSWER'S SKEW: the database favours cognition studies, which the paper says is representative of the field, and offers that imbalance as a reason the right hippocampus yielded no clean solution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE FOUNDATIONAL RECORD WAS WRONG: half a century of assumptions rest on one patient whose lesion, when finally imaged, did not match the surgical account of it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a result that did not survive correction is reported anyway, labelled, and interpreted with caution rather than dropped Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: coactivation-based parcellation of every voxel in the hippocampal region of interest using the BrainMap database, k-means over the coactivation profiles, then activation likelihood estimation, forward and reverse functional decoding, resting-state connectivity and diffusion tractography Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: meta-analysis — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: a functional gradient along the long axis of the hippocampus, with limbic processing anteriorly and perceptual or spatial processing posteriorly Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: long-axis functional topography of the hippocampus — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → Fanselow and Dong (2010); King et al. (2008) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Moser and Moser (1998) model and the HERNET model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Kim (2015) HERNET model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Moser and Moser's dorsal to ventral hippocampal gradient, imported from rodent connectivity and behaviour Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → that same model, by finding hot and cold processing along the axis but also cold processing anteriorly on the right Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → Kim's hippocampal encoding and retrieval network model, supporting its posterior default mode claim and not its anterior dorsal attention claim Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the single-paradigm designs that dominate the field, which cannot say whether other neurocognitive processes use the same subregions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE NUMBER OF TASKS PER STUDY. 'these results support the fundamental argument that the hippocampus maintains a neurofunctional topographical organization, but Quotation withheld [task].' The topography is granted and the specificity is not - and no accumulation of single-task studies can supply it, so the missing result is not a matter of more evidence. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the inferential base of the field itself - non-human data, case studies, and narrowly focused cognitive experiments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → Chase and colleagues' five-cluster parcellation of the subiculum by nearly identical methodology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | clusters —distinct-from→ gradient Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE OUTPUT TYPE IS A PROPERTY OF THE METHOD: defining the topography as distinct clusters is called a theoretical choice, and a gradient is called plausible and likely and beyond what the method can represent
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but a gradient component is 'plausible, and likely' beside the clusters; distinct-from is loose. | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | behavioral domain —distinct-from→ paradigm class Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the two are listed as separate metadata fields; distinct-from is loose. also in: behavioral domain · paradigm class | concept_edges[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | forward inference —operationalised-as→ taxonomic label Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE SAME TAG READ IN ONE DIRECTION: is activation more probable for this label inside the cluster than across the whole database
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the forward-inference profile is computed from activation probabilities per taxonomic label; operationalised-as is loose. also in: forward inference · taxonomic label | concept_edges[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | forward inference —operationalised-as→ binomial test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but a binomial test was USED WITHIN the forward-inference approach to judge significance; operationalised-as is loose. also in: forward inference · binomial test | concept_edges[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | reverse inference —operationalised-as→ behavioral domain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: AND IN THE OTHER: which label is most likely given activation here - the two questions are not the same and both are reported
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the reverse-inference profile identifies the most likely behavioral domain; operationalised-as is loose. also in: reverse inference · behavioral domain | concept_edges[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | seed masks —distinct-from→ target masks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: each cluster against 110 atlas regions, themselves thresholded at 50 percent - a second layer of cuts underneath the first also in: seed masks · target masks | concept_edges[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | anterior —contrasted-with→ posterior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the hot and cold division, carried across from the rodent ventral and dorsal poles
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the contrast is what earlier authors 'speculated' about ventral and dorsal portions; attributed and hedged. | concept_edges[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | H.M. —is-a→ case study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: THE FOUNDATIONAL RECORD WAS WRONG: imaging in the 1990s revealed discrepancies in the neurosurgical account of the lesion, confirmed after death also in: H.M. · case study | concept_edges[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | binomial test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: binomial test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chi-squared Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chi-squared | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | z-score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: z-score | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | false discovery rate correction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: false discovery rate correction | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | k-means clustering Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: k-means clustering | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | permutation / null-distribution test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permutation / null-distribution test | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | binomial test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: binomial test | content_tags.statistics[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | χ 2 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: χ 2 | content_tags.statistics[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FDR correction Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: FDR correction | content_tags.statistics[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | activation likelihood estimation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: activation likelihood estimation | content_tags.statistics[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | z ‐scores Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: z ‐scores | content_tags.statistics[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The left hippocampus divides into three anterior-to-posterior clusters: an emotional cluster tied to amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus, a cognitive cluster tied to anterior cingulate and inferior frontal gyrus, and a posterior perceptual cluster tied to occipital lobe, precuneus and angular gyrus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The right hippocampus does not yield one clear parcellation: both a 2-cluster and a 5-cluster solution remain plausible. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The anterior-most left cluster was behaviourally characterised by face monitoring/discrimination, cued explicit recall and encoding. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The middle left cluster was characterised by paired associate recall, cued explicit recognition and encoding. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The behavioural labels attached to the right-hippocampal clusters failed FDR correction, so they are reported only with caution. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Diffusion tractography showed the posterior left cluster connecting to the occipital lobe, specifically lingual gyrus and occipital pole, alongside parahippocampal, posterior cingulate and amygdala connections. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Interhemispheric structural connections increase toward the posterior end of both left and right hippocampus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Left and right hippocampus produce different clustering profiles, which the authors read as evidence of hemispheric lateralization. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The data support a hot-to-cold anterior-posterior gradient but depart from it in one respect: anterior right-hemisphere portions are also engaged in "cold" processing. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | the left hippocampus divided into three segments running anterior to posterior, associated with faces and recall, with paired associate recall and recognition, and with perception Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the right hippocampus divided into five regions, less well defined behaviourally than the left Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | AND THOSE RIGHT-SIDE LABELS DID NOT SURVIVE CORRECTION, which the paper states and then interprets with caution rather than dropping them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | an alternative to the 5‐cluster model is a 2‐cluster solution, found to be slightly less favorable, with an anterior and a posterior segment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | BOTH SOLUTIONS ARE PRESENTED: the 5‐cluster solution was deemed marginally better than the 2‐cluster solution, and which is ideal may become clearer as more data is added to the database Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE CRITERIA FOR HOW MANY CLUSTERS DISAGREE WITH EACH OTHER: deviant percentage, minimum-to-mean cluster size and intercluster distance each favour a different set of solutions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the reported answer is their combination - three on the left, five on the right Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the criteria are stated as rules in advance: the percentage of deviants not significantly increased compared with the k − 1 solution, the minimum cluster size more than half of the average cluster size, and no significantly larger increase in intercluster to intracluster distance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clustering separates the voxels in the ROI into k non‐overlapping clusters, minimizing the variance within clusters and maximizing the variance between clusters, with centroids chosen at random for each new iteration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | k values from 2 to 7 were computed for each region before any selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE METHOD CANNOT REPRESENT A GRADIENT, and the paper says a gradient is plausible and likely Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and offers the same ambiguity a second reading - the right hippocampus may simply not be organised by behavioural or stimulus features Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the region of interest is an atlas thresholded at 75 percent, described as conservative and as easy to communicate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with mean membership probability of 86 to 88 percent and centroids above 97 percent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the database holds 2,630 papers, 12,623 experiments, 100 paradigm classes and 52,289 subjects Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and stores each paper as significant coordinates plus coded metadata - behavioral domain, paradigm class and subject population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | only healthy normal-mapping experiments were used, with no restriction by domain or paradigm, to keep the model unconstrained Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | NO SINGLE VOXEL HAS ENOUGH STUDIES, so each borrows the nearest reported activations by Euclidian distance and its profile is a neighbourhood rather than a measurement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the number of nearest experiments was swept from 20 to 200 in steps of 5, and stable ranges chosen by fewest deviant voxels Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FORWARD INFERENCE asks whether a label is more likely to activate inside the cluster than across the database, tested binomially Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | REVERSE INFERENCE asks which label is most likely given activation in the cluster, tested by chi square Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cluster profiles were built by activation likelihood estimation against a null of random spatial association, corrected family-wise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[30] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE DATABASE'S SKEW IS OFFERED AS AN EXPLANATION OF THE RESULT: it heavily favours cognition studies, which is representative of the field, and may be why no obvious right hippocampal solution emerged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[31] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the two avenues named are increasing the number of papers in the BrainMap database, and submillimeter fMRI specifically targeting the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[32] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | THE FIELD'S FOUNDATIONAL RECORD WAS WRONG: imaging decades later revealed discrepancies in the surgical account of H.M.'s lesion, confirmed after his death Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[33] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | and the field's inferences are said to rest on non-human data, case studies, and single-process experiments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[34] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | prior parcellation work used one paradigm at a time, so it could not say whether other processes use the same subregions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[35] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | left anterior clusters connected structurally to the amygdala, thalamus and parahippocampal gyrus, with brainstem connections in most of the sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[36] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the posterior left cluster reached the lingual gyrus and occipital pole and lacked the sub-lobar connections of the others Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[37] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the fourth right cluster had the most diverse connectivity of all, which is used to argue for adding studies rather than for a functional claim Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[38] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | interhemispheric connections increased toward the posterior end on both sides Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[39] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | tracts were kept only where present in more than 15 percent of the sample with connection probability above 10 percent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[40] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | each cluster was scored against 110 atlas target masks thresholded at 50 percent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[41] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | anatomical labels come from the Talairach Demon applied to the coordinates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: This quote ends with the stray word 'For', the first word of the next sentence. It is not trimmed, because the quote without it occurs more than once in the paper's text and could not be tied to one place. The claim is carried by the sentence before 'For'. | content_tags.findings[42] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | twenty-three healthy individuals were scanned with a resting-state EPI sequence optimised for the hippocampus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[43] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | partial concordance with the hot and cold model: the axis holds, but anterior right clusters also carry cold processes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[44] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | posterior clusters connect to the posterior cingulate, supporting the default mode half of the encoding-retrieval model and not its anterior half Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[45] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a companion study parcellating only the subiculum with nearly identical methods also found five clusters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[46] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | very few studies address lateralization in this literature, though most have theorized that the right hippocampus is engaged in spatial processing and the left attuned to verbal information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[47] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | coactivation-based parcellation (CBP) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | meta-analytic connectivity mapping (MACM) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | forward inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: forward inference | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | reverse inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reverse inference | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | clustering Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clustering | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | BrainMap Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: BrainMap | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | forward inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: forward inference | content_tags.definitions[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | reverse inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reverse inference | content_tags.definitions[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ALE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ALE | content_tags.definitions[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | deviants Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: deviants | content_tags.definitions[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | number of experiments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: number of experiments | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | percentage of misclassified voxels Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: percentage of misclassified voxels | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | anatomical connectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: anatomical connectivity | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | deviants Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: deviants | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | cluster size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cluster size | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | probability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: probability | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | functional connectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: functional connectivity | content_tags.variables[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | structural connectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: structural connectivity | content_tags.variables[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 2,630 papers, 12,623 experiments, 100 paradigm classes, 52,289 subjects — size of the BrainMap database at the time of the analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1,880 mm 3 / 2,072 mm 3 — volumes of the left and right hippocampal regions of interest Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Twenty-three — number of healthy participants scanned for the 7T resting-state fMRI Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 31 — number of healthy participants scanned for the diffusion tensor imaging Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1,000 iterations — number of K-means restarts used to search for the optimal clustering solution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 15% / 10% — tractography thresholds: paths present in more than 15% of the sample and tracts with connection probability above 10% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 75% — the atlas probability at which the hippocampal region of interest was cut out, which is what fixes the object's boundary Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 2,630 papers — the database behind every data point here: 12,623 experiments, 100 paradigm classes and 52,289 subjects Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 20 through 200 — nearest experiments per voxel, swept in steps of 5, with the stable range chosen by fewest deviant voxels Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 2 through 7 — the cluster counts computed for each region before any criterion was applied Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 3, and for the right, 5 — the cluster counts finally reported, arrived at by combining criteria that individually favoured different numbers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 15% — the share of the sample in which a tract had to be present to be kept, alongside a 10 percent connection probability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 110 total masks — atlas targets, themselves thresholded at 50 percent, that the tractography is sorted into Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.