standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | how a copy of the motor command reaches auditory cortex and what it does to hearing during movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | which synapses and which circuit carry the motor-related suppression of auditory cortical responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | identifies the suppression as postsynaptic inhibition from local PV interneurons, driven by a specific set of secondary motor cortex neurons that project to auditory cortex and fire before movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | motor-related corollary discharge in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: may reflect | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | motor-related signals excite PV interneurons, which postsynaptically inhibit excitatory cells and suppress both spontaneous and evoked activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: mechanisms[0] | mechanisms[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the inhibitory cells fire well before movement onset and before the excitatory cells fall below baseline, in the order M2 then PV then excitatory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the movement-related voltage change reverses near the chloride equilibrium potential, which is what identifies the inhibition as postsynaptic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the suppression may dampen sensitivity to predictable quiet sounds while preserving responsiveness to unexpected loud ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the mechanism differs from the disinhibition proposed for locomotion-driven gain increases in visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The evidence establishes postsynaptic inhibition but does not exclude a presynaptic contribution. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the mechanism of the suppression: the features INDICATE ... POSTSYNAPTIC INHIBITION, BUT DO NOT EXCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY THAT PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION IS ALSO INVOLVED | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Animals were not randomised to groups and investigators were not blinded to group allocation. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every group comparison in the paper: RANDOMIZATION WAS NOT USED TO DETERMINE HOW ANIMALS WERE ALLOCATED TO EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS, NOR WERE INVESTIGATORS BLINDED TO GROUP ALLOCATION | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Optogenetic terminal stimulation could in principle recruit indirect pathways via antidromic activation (argued against by two control observations). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the terminal-stimulation results: OPTOGENETIC ACTIVATION OF M2 TERMINALS ... TRIGGERS ANTIDROMIC PROPAGATION ... AND THUS EXCITES OTHER TARGETS OF M2 ACtx CELLS | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | postsynaptic inhibition is established but presynaptic inhibition is not excluded outright Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - postsynaptic inhibition is established, presynaptic is not excluded | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | M2 could also act indirectly through neuromodulatory cell groups, which the design does not rule out Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the direct-pathway interpretation: M2 COULD ALSO ACT INDIRECTLY THROUGH OR IN CONCERT WITH NEUROMODULATORY CELL GROUPS | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | vocalizations were always accompanied by other movements, so no vocalization-specific signal could be isolated Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any vocalisation-specific reading: VOCALIZATIONS WERE ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY OTHER HEAD AND BODY MOVEMENTS, and the membrane potential dynamics WERE INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THOSE OBSERVED DURING HEAD MOVEMENTS | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | excitatory cells were identified by intrinsic and firing properties, with staining in only a subset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: results reported by cell class: cells were CLASSIFIED AS PUTATIVE EXCITATORY CELLS BASED ON THEIR INTRINSIC PROPERTIES ... AND, IN A SUBSET OF NEURONS, INTRACELLULAR STAINING | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | corollary discharge as a framework, imported from systems where the motor copy is a single identified neuron Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | terminal stimulation used to bypass a pathway rather than to activate a region, isolating where an effect arises Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | randomisation of animals to experimental groups - NOT USED, and the paper says so Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that a difference between groups is a difference in which animals were put in them · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-declared-unreported | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | blinding of investigators to group allocation - NOT USED, and the paper says so Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: experimenter expectancy in allocating and handling the animals · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): absent-declared-unreported | controls[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | blinding to movement/rest and laser on/off obtained from AUTOMATION rather than procedure - membrane potential mean and variance, tone-evoked responses and movement onset/offset all calculated automatically Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the experimenter's judgement in scoring the conditions that carry the paper's main claim - the blinding the previous sentence says was not done by allocation is recovered here by taking the human out of the measurement · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[2] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | corollary discharge here means a motor-related signal that PRECEDES movement, which is what distinguishes it from sensory reafference caused by the movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the local share of the suppression is quantified rather than asserted: about 60 percent arises inside auditory cortex, the rest elsewhere in the pathway Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | M2 ACtx cells are a subset defined by their projection target, identified by an intersectional strategy, and behave like the general M2 population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | movement here spans locomotion, head and body movements, grooming and vocalization, all producing indistinguishable auditory cortical dynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the head-fixed treadmill preparation was validated against the freely behaving one before being used for the optogenetics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: sharp-electrode intracellular recording in freely behaving and head-fixed mice, with optogenetic activation and silencing, multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: suppression of auditory cortical responses before and during movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: motor-related corollary discharge in auditory cortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the disinhibitory mechanism proposed for locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses (ref. 38), the negative-rescaling account of state-dependent auditory cortical changes (ref. 23) and presynaptic depression from state-dependent thalamic activity (ref. 30) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the prior anatomical finding that the M2-to-auditory-cortex projection is almost completely ipsilateral (ref. 20) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → observations of movement-related modulation of auditory cortex in monkeys and humans (refs. 1, 10, 11, 18, 37), for which a direct motor-cortical role had not been tested Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → sensory reafference and peripheral masking as explanations for movement-related auditory suppression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | distinguishes-from → the disinhibitory account of locomotion-driven gain increases in visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS THE CIRCUIT MECHANISM, WITH BOTH NAMED. 'This mechanism contrasts with A DISINHIBITORY MECHANISM implicated in locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses, WITH A parallel negative rescaling of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic drive that has been advanced to account for STATE-DEPENDENT CHANGES.' Two accounts of behaviour-driven cortical change that predict opposite things about inhibition - so a result reported as 'state-dependent modulation' is compatible with either until the inhibitory drive is measured. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → anesthetized-mouse work showing motor cortical synapses suppress tone-evoked auditory responses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → corollary discharge accounts described across species from insects to humans Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → anatomical tracing showing the M2-to-auditory projection is almost entirely ipsilateral Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | PV+ —causes→ excitatory neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: SIGN: suppressive, and the firing order M2 then PV then excitatory matches the proposed direction
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports PV+ rates rising while excitatory rates fell; causes is loose here. also in: PV+ · excitatory neurons | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | presynaptic depression —operationalised-as→ onset slope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: CRITERION, and the assay was VALIDATED FIRST: 20 Hz stimulation was shown to change the slope before the absence of a change was claimed as a null also in: presynaptic depression · onset slope | concept_edges[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | visual cortex —contrasted-with→ auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: SIGN REVERSAL: the same manipulation raises gain in one sensory cortex and lowers it in the other also in: visual cortex · auditory cortex | concept_edges[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | significance level (alpha) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: significance level (alpha) | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | interaction effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interaction effect | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | percentile threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: percentile threshold | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | linear regression / slope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: linear regression / slope | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | linearly related Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: linearly related | content_tags.statistics[8] | 0.7 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Just before and during locomotion, head movements, grooming and other movements, auditory cortical excitatory neurons showed less variable membrane potentials and a slight depolarization. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | These membrane potential changes began on average more than 200 ms before locomotion started and persisted about as long after it ended. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Because the cortical changes precede movement onset by hundreds of milliseconds, they cannot be caused by sensory reafference from the movement, and could reflect a motor-related signal. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Unlike visual cortex, where locomotion boosts responses, tone-evoked synaptic responses of auditory cortical excitatory neurons were significantly reduced during movement. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Roughly 60 percent of the movement-related suppression of tone-evoked responses originates within the auditory cortex itself rather than upstream, since optogenetically evoked thalamocortical responses were suppressed in proportion to tone responses. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The rising slope of thalamocortical EPSPs was unchanged between movement and rest, ruling out presynaptic depression of thalamic terminals as the cause of suppression. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The movement-related membrane potential change reversed near -72 mV, close to the chloride equilibrium potential reported for mouse auditory cortical pyramidal neurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Around movement, PV+ and other fast-spiking interneurons in auditory cortex increased their firing while putative excitatory neurons decreased theirs. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The inhibitory neurons' firing rose several hundred milliseconds before movement onset and before excitatory cells dropped below baseline, consistent with inhibition leading the suppression. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Excitatory neurons in secondary motor cortex increased their firing about 870 ms before movement onset, earlier than any of the auditory cortical changes. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Optogenetically activating M2 axon terminals in the auditory cortex of a resting mouse reproduced the movement signature: reduced membrane potential variability, reduced tone-evoked responses and slight depolarization. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The terminal-activation effect was not an indirect antidromic one: it survived pharmacological silencing of M2 cell bodies with TTX. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The auditory cortical change began within 7 ms of terminal stimulation, faster than the roughly 12 ms antidromic conduction time back to M2, again excluding an indirect route. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Silencing ipsilateral M2 restored rest-like membrane potential dynamics in auditory cortex within about 70 ms of laser onset. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Tones presented after M2 silencing, while the mouse was still moving, showed a strong (~40 percent) recovery of tone-evoked responses. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | auditory cortical excitatory neurons are suppressed before and during movement, due in part to increased activity of local PV+ interneurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the change led locomotion by more than 200 ms and outlasted it by about as much Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | tone-evoked synaptic responses were suppressed during movement, opposite to the visual cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | PV and other fast-spiking cells increased firing before movement while excitatory cells decreased Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the firing order was PV at -805 ms, other inhibitory cells at -605 ms and excitatory cells at -490 ms relative to movement onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | M2 cells defined by their projection to auditory cortex behaved like the general M2 population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | activating M2 terminals in resting mice reproduced the movement-like dynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | silencing ipsilateral M2 restored rest-like dynamics within about 70 ms, while contralateral silencing did nothing until movement stopped Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | APPORTIONED, NOT EXCLUDED: about 60 percent of the suppression arises inside auditory cortex, measured from the slope relating optogenetic to tone suppression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ASSAY VALIDATED BEFORE THE NULL: high-frequency stimulation was shown to reduce EPSP onset slope before the absence of such a change during movement was claimed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[24] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CONTROL NULL: EPSP onset slope did not differ between movement and rest, so thalamic terminals are not depressed during movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[25] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CONFOUND EXCLUDED TWO WAYS: the terminal-activation effect survived TTX silencing of M2 somata and was faster than antidromic propagation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[26] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | DECOUPLING EXPERIMENT: with ipsilateral M2 silenced the cortex returned to a rest-like state while the mouse was still moving, and tones then recovered about 40 percent of their response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[27] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the decoupling separates the neural state from the movement itself and shows the state controls the gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[28] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | silencing M2 in a resting mouse slightly enhanced tone responses, so even baseline M2 activity is mildly suppressive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[29] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | corollary discharge signals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: corollary discharge signals | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | M2 ACtx cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: M2 ACtx cells | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | corollary discharge Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: corollary discharge | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | onset slope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: onset slope | content_tags.definitions[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | antidromic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: antidromic | content_tags.definitions[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: movement | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | laser stimulation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: laser stimulation | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | membrane potential variability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: membrane potential variability | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | peak tone-evoked response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: peak tone-evoked response | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | body temperature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: body temperature | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | membrane potential Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: membrane potential | content_tags.variables[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | onset slope Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: onset slope | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | locomotion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: locomotion | content_tags.variables[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | slope = 0.6 — Linear relation between suppression of optogenetically evoked and tone-evoked responses, implying ~60% of suppression is cortex-local Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | >200 ms — Average lead time by which auditory cortical membrane potential changes precede locomotion onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | −805 ms for PV+ cells, −605 ms for VGAT+ cells, and −490 ms for excitatory cells — Times relative to movement onset at which each cell population's firing rate changed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | −870 ms — Time relative to movement onset at which M2 excitatory neuron firing increased Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~ −72 mV — Reversal potential of the movement-related membrane potential change, near the chloride equilibrium potential Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | <7 ms — Latency of auditory cortical change after M2 terminal stimulation, versus ~12 ms antidromic propagation time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~500 ms — Delay after light onset at which silencing M2 arrested the animal's movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~40 percent — Recovery of tone-evoked response when ipsilateral M2 was silenced during ongoing movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 14.25 min — Mean duration of the intracellular recordings in freely behaving mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | n = 37 cells from 11 mice — Sample for the treadmill comparison of membrane potential variance at rest versus movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p = 8e-9 — Significance of the drop in tone-evoked voltage area from rest to movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | more than 200 ms — how far the auditory cortical change precedes locomotion onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 60 percent — share of movement-related suppression arising locally in auditory cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | -72 mV — reversal potential of the movement-related change, near the chloride equilibrium Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | under 7 ms against about 12 ms — onset of the terminal-activation effect against antidromic propagation time Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 40 percent — recovery of tone-evoked responses when M2 is silenced during ongoing movement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 70 ms — delay before ipsilateral M2 silencing restored rest-like cortical dynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.