A synaptic and circuit basis for corollary discharge in the auditory cortex — TEI-tagged view

Schneider, Nelson, Mooney · 2014 · neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nature13724 · full text at the source · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (xml); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. The XML source renders citations as bare superscript numbers with surrounding spaces (e.g. "...visual cortical responses 38 ,"), so relation targets are described by reference number rather than author name — the article text itself contains no reference list above the quoted material. method='electrophysiology' covers the core evidence (in vivo intracellular current clamp plus multi-electrode arrays); the study also uses two-photon calcium imaging of GCaMP6s-labelled M2-to-auditory-cortex neurons and optogenetic/pharmacological manipulation, which the single-value method facet cannot express. 2026-08-13, 2026-08-15 and 2026-08-25 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
8 quotations on this page contain a reference number where the paper printed a superscript. This journal style prints citations as raised numerals — parameters12,13 — and the extraction flattened them into the line, so the sentence reads parameters 12 , 13 . The digits are citation markers and not part of what the author wrote. The quotes keep them for the same reason they keep every other extraction fault: a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
standard deviation 3 fields · masking 2 fields
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
corollary discharge auditory cortex19 M24 PV+22 excitatory neurons3 reafference membrane potential7 thalamocortical2 ChR211 TTX2 antidromic2 presynaptic depression onset slope visual cortex9 locomotion8 GCaMP6s5 input resistance6 masking9 electrophysiology110

Our tag layer for this paper

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenonmotor-related corollary discharge in auditory cortex— “We found that a wide variety of natural movements strongly suppresses the spontaneous and tone-evoked synaptic activity of auditory cortical excitatory cells and that a substantial fraction of this suppression is mediated through a postsynaptic mechanism involving increased local inhibition via PV+ interneurons.”
claim-typemechanism— “Using in vivo intracellular recordings in behaving mice, we find that excitatory neurons in the auditory cortex are suppressed prior to and during movement, due in part to increased activity of local parvalbumin-positive (PV+) interneurons.”
method — evidence— “Here we combine in vivo intracellular physiology with optogenetic circuit manipulations in freely behaving mice to identify a synaptic signature of movement in the auditory cortex and to elucidate local and long-range circuits that modulate auditory cortical activity during movement.”
object of study — evidence— “In mammals, signals propagating from the motor cortex to the auditory cortex are thought to play a critical role in normal hearing and behavior, yet the synaptic and circuit mechanisms by which these motor-related signals influence auditory cortical activity remain poorly understood.”
research question — evidence— “Despite the widespread observation that movement can modulate auditory cortical activity and the presumed role of the motor cortex in driving this modulation, the synaptic and circuit mechanisms by which the motor cortex influences auditory cortical activity during movement remain unresolved.”
contribution — evidence— “Electrophysiology and optogenetic gain- and loss-of-function experiments reveal that motor-related changes in auditory cortical dynamics are driven by a subset of neurons in the secondary motor cortex that innervate the auditory cortex and are active during movement.”
transferfrom invertebrate neuroethology: corollary discharge as a framework, imported from systems where the motor copy is a single identified neuron— “Notably, whereas the gain of stimulus-evoked responses in visual cortical pyramidal cells increases with locomotion 5 , 25 , perhaps to compensate for increased visual flow, auditory cortical responses to tones decreased during movement. This suppressive effect, which resembles corollary discharge signals described in the auditory systems of…transfers[0]
transferfrom optogenetics: terminal stimulation used to bypass a pathway rather than to activate a region, isolating where an effect arises— “Whereas acoustic stimulation activates the auditory system from the periphery to the cortex, this optogenetic approach allowed us to effectively bypass the ascending auditory pathway prior to the thalamocortical projection and to thus isolate the component of motor-related suppression that occurs within the auditory cortex.”transfers[1]
mechanismMotor-related signals from secondary motor cortex excite PV+ interneurons in auditory cortex, which postsynaptically inhibit excitatory cells and thereby suppress both spontaneous and sound-evoked activity— “These experiments indicate that in the auditory cortex, motor-related signals excite PV+ interneurons, which in turn postsynaptically inhibit excitatory cells to suppress their spontaneous activity and stimulus-evoked responses.”mechanisms[0]
mechanismTransient motor-driven dampening of sensitivity to self-predictable quiet sounds preserves headroom for responding to unexpected loud stimuli— “may reflect a general strategy where motor-related signals transiently dampen sensitivity to predictable low-intensity sounds, enabling auditory neurons to maintain responsiveness to unexpected high-intensity stimuli”mechanisms[1]
mechanismmotor-related signals excite PV interneurons, which postsynaptically inhibit excitatory cells and suppress both spontaneous and evoked activity— “These experiments indicate that in the auditory cortex, motor-related signals excite PV+ interneurons, which in turn postsynaptically inhibit excitatory cells to suppress their spontaneous activity and stimulus-evoked responses.”mechanisms[2]
mechanismthe inhibitory cells fire well before movement onset and before the excitatory cells fall below baseline, in the order M2 then PV then excitatory— “As a population, inhibitory neuron firing rates increased well before movement onset and also before the firing rates of auditory cortical excitatory cells decreased below their baseline levels (−805 ms for PV+ cells, −605 ms for VGAT+ cells, and −490 ms for excitatory cells, relative to movement onset).”mechanisms[3]
mechanismthe movement-related voltage change reverses near the chloride equilibrium potential, which is what identifies the inhibition as postsynaptic— “The movement-related change in mean membrane potential reversed in sign at ~ −72 mV, which was 3 mV depolarized relative to the average resting Vm and close to the chloride equilibrium potential reported for mouse auditory cortical pyramidal neurons”mechanisms[4]
mechanismthe suppression may dampen sensitivity to predictable quiet sounds while preserving responsiveness to unexpected loud ones— “Notably, whereas the gain of stimulus-evoked responses in visual cortical pyramidal cells increases with locomotion 5 , 25 , perhaps to compensate for increased visual flow, auditory cortical responses to tones decreased during movement. This suppressive effect, which resembles corollary discharge signals described in the auditory systems of…mechanisms[5]
mechanismthe mechanism differs from the disinhibition proposed for locomotion-driven gain increases in visual cortex— “This mechanism contrasts with a disinhibitory mechanism implicated in locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses 38 , with a parallel negative rescaling of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic drive that has been advanced to account for state-dependent changes in auditory cortical responsiveness 23 , and with presynaptic…mechanisms[6]
contradicts the disinhibitory mechanism proposed for locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses (ref. 38), the negative-rescaling account of state-dependent auditory cortical changes (ref. 23) and presynaptic depression from state-dependent thalamic activity (ref. 30)— “This mechanism contrasts with a disinhibitory mechanism implicated in locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses 38 , with a parallel negative rescaling of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic drive that has been advanced to account for state-dependent changes in auditory cortical responsiveness 23 , and with presynaptic…claim_relations[0]
builds-on the prior anatomical finding that the M2-to-auditory-cortex projection is almost completely ipsilateral (ref. 20)— “These differential effects of silencing ipsilateral versus contralateral M2 on auditory cortical dynamics are consistent with a previous anatomical finding that the projection from M2 to auditory cortex is almost completely ipsilateral 20 .”claim_relations[1]
extends observations of movement-related modulation of auditory cortex in monkeys and humans (refs. 1, 10, 11, 18, 37), for which a direct motor-cortical role had not been tested— “Although movement-related modulation of auditory cortical activity has been detected in monkey and human auditory cortex during a variety of behaviors 1 , 10 , 11 , 18 , 37 , a direct role for the motor cortex in these modulatory processes was…claim_relations[2]
contradicts sensory reafference and peripheral masking as explanations for movement-related auditory suppressionclaim_relations[3]
distinguishes-from the disinhibitory account of locomotion-driven gain increases in visual cortex
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
claim_relations[4]
extends anesthetized-mouse work showing motor cortical synapses suppress tone-evoked auditory responses
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
claim_relations[5]
supports corollary discharge accounts described across species from insects to humans
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
claim_relations[6]
builds-on anatomical tracing showing the M2-to-auditory projection is almost entirely ipsilateral
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
claim_relations[7]
sensecorollary discharge here means a motor-related signal that PRECEDES movement, which is what distinguishes it from sensory reafference caused by the movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[0]
sensethe local share of the suppression is quantified rather than asserted: about 60 percent arises inside auditory cortex, the rest elsewhere in the pathway
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[1]
senseM2 ACtx cells are a subset defined by their projection target, identified by an intersectional strategy, and behave like the general M2 population
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[2]
sensemovement here spans locomotion, head and body movements, grooming and vocalization, all producing indistinguishable auditory cortical dynamics
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[3]
sensethe head-fixed treadmill preparation was validated against the freely behaving one before being used for the optogenetics
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[4]
controlrandomisation of animals to experimental groups - NOT USED, and the paper says so — absent-declared-unreported — rules out that a difference between groups is a difference in which animals were put in them
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
controls[0]
controlblinding of investigators to group allocation - NOT USED, and the paper says so — absent-declared-unreported — rules out experimenter expectancy in allocating and handling the animals
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
controls[1]
controlblinding to movement/rest and laser on/off obtained from AUTOMATION rather than procedure - membrane potential mean and variance, tone-evoked responses and movement onset/offset all calculated automatically — held — rules out the experimenter's judgement in scoring the conditions that carry the paper's main claim - the blinding the previous sentence says was not done by allocation is recovered here by taking the human out of the measurement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
controls[2]
differs inthe disinhibitory account of locomotion-driven gain increases in visual cortex — THE AXIS IS THE CIRCUIT MECHANISM, WITH BOTH NAMED. 'This mechanism contrasts with A DISINHIBITORY MECHANISM implicated in locomotion-dependent increases in visual cortical responses, WITH A parallel negative rescaling of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic drive that has been advanced to account for STATE-DEPENDENT CHANGES.' Two accounts of behaviour-driven cortical change that predict opposite things about inhibition - so a result reported as 'state-dependent modulation' is compatible with either until the inhibitory drive is measured.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
claim_relations[4]
auditPV+ —causes→ excitatory neurons — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span reports PV+ rates rising while excitatory rates fell; causes is loose here.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[3]
notePV+ —causes→ excitatory neurons — SIGN: suppressive, and the firing order M2 then PV then excitatory matches the proposed direction
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[3]
notepresynaptic depression —operationalised-as→ onset slope — CRITERION, and the assay was VALIDATED FIRST: 20 Hz stimulation was shown to change the slope before the absence of a change was claimed as a null
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[6]
notevisual cortex —contrasted-with→ auditory cortex — SIGN REVERSAL: the same manipulation raises gain in one sensory cortex and lowers it in the other
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[9]
outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation)control — absent-declared-unreportedcontrols[0]
outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation)control — absent-declared-unreportedcontrols[1]
outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation)control — heldcontrols[2]
for which uselimitation — the mechanism of the suppression: the features INDICATE ... POSTSYNAPTIC INHIBITION, BUT DO NOT EXCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY THAT PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION IS ALSO INVOLVED
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
for which uselimitation — every group comparison in the paper: RANDOMIZATION WAS NOT USED TO DETERMINE HOW ANIMALS WERE ALLOCATED TO EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS, NOR WERE INVESTIGATORS BLINDED TO GROUP ALLOCATION
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[1]
for which uselimitation — the terminal-stimulation results: OPTOGENETIC ACTIVATION OF M2 TERMINALS ... TRIGGERS ANTIDROMIC PROPAGATION ... AND THUS EXCITES OTHER TARGETS OF M2 ACtx CELLS
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[2]
duplicate oflimitation — limitations[0]
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
for which uselimitation — the same scope as limitations[0] - postsynaptic inhibition is established, presynaptic is not excluded
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
for which uselimitation — the direct-pathway interpretation: M2 COULD ALSO ACT INDIRECTLY THROUGH OR IN CONCERT WITH NEUROMODULATORY CELL GROUPS
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[4]
for which uselimitation — any vocalisation-specific reading: VOCALIZATIONS WERE ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY OTHER HEAD AND BODY MOVEMENTS, and the membrane potential dynamics WERE INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THOSE OBSERVED DURING HEAD MOVEMENTS
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[5]
for which uselimitation — results reported by cell class: cells were CLASSIFIED AS PUTATIVE EXCITATORY CELLS BASED ON THEIR INTRINSIC PROPERTIES ... AND, IN A SUBSET OF NEURONS, INTRACELLULAR STAINING
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
evidential statusmechanism — the paper's own words: may reflect
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
mechanisms[1]
duplicate ofmechanism — mechanisms[0]
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
mechanisms[2]
replicationuntested
limitationThe evidence establishes postsynaptic inhibition but does not exclude a presynaptic contribution.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
limitationAnimals were not randomised to groups and investigators were not blinded to group allocation.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[1]
limitationOptogenetic terminal stimulation could in principle recruit indirect pathways via antidromic activation (argued against by two control observations).
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[2]
limitationpostsynaptic inhibition is established but presynaptic inhibition is not excluded outright
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
limitationM2 could also act indirectly through neuromodulatory cell groups, which the design does not rule out
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[4]
limitationvocalizations were always accompanied by other movements, so no vocalization-specific signal could be isolated
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[5]
limitationexcitatory cells were identified by intrinsic and firing properties, with staining in only a subset
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
findingJust before and during locomotion, head movements, grooming and other movements, auditory cortical excitatory neurons showed less variable membrane potentials and a slight depolarization.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[0]
findingThese membrane potential changes began on average more than 200 ms before locomotion started and persisted about as long after it ended.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[1]
findingBecause the cortical changes precede movement onset by hundreds of milliseconds, they cannot be caused by sensory reafference from the movement, and could reflect a motor-related signal.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[2]
findingUnlike visual cortex, where locomotion boosts responses, tone-evoked synaptic responses of auditory cortical excitatory neurons were significantly reduced during movement.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[3]
findingRoughly 60 percent of the movement-related suppression of tone-evoked responses originates within the auditory cortex itself rather than upstream, since optogenetically evoked thalamocortical responses were suppressed in proportion to tone responses.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[4]
findingThe rising slope of thalamocortical EPSPs was unchanged between movement and rest, ruling out presynaptic depression of thalamic terminals as the cause of suppression.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[5]
findingThe movement-related membrane potential change reversed near -72 mV, close to the chloride equilibrium potential reported for mouse auditory cortical pyramidal neurons.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[6]
findingAround movement, PV+ and other fast-spiking interneurons in auditory cortex increased their firing while putative excitatory neurons decreased theirs.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[7]
findingThe inhibitory neurons' firing rose several hundred milliseconds before movement onset and before excitatory cells dropped below baseline, consistent with inhibition leading the suppression.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[8]
findingExcitatory neurons in secondary motor cortex increased their firing about 870 ms before movement onset, earlier than any of the auditory cortical changes.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[9]
findingOptogenetically activating M2 axon terminals in the auditory cortex of a resting mouse reproduced the movement signature: reduced membrane potential variability, reduced tone-evoked responses and slight depolarization.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[10]
findingThe terminal-activation effect was not an indirect antidromic one: it survived pharmacological silencing of M2 cell bodies with TTX.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[11]
findingThe auditory cortical change began within 7 ms of terminal stimulation, faster than the roughly 12 ms antidromic conduction time back to M2, again excluding an indirect route.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[12]
findingSilencing ipsilateral M2 restored rest-like membrane potential dynamics in auditory cortex within about 70 ms of laser onset.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[13]
findingTones presented after M2 silencing, while the mouse was still moving, showed a strong (~40 percent) recovery of tone-evoked responses.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[14]
findingauditory cortical excitatory neurons are suppressed before and during movement, due in part to increased activity of local PV+ interneurons
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[15]
findingthe change led locomotion by more than 200 ms and outlasted it by about as much
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[16]
findingtone-evoked synaptic responses were suppressed during movement, opposite to the visual cortex
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[17]
findingPV and other fast-spiking cells increased firing before movement while excitatory cells decreased
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[18]
findingthe firing order was PV at -805 ms, other inhibitory cells at -605 ms and excitatory cells at -490 ms relative to movement onset
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[19]
findingM2 cells defined by their projection to auditory cortex behaved like the general M2 population
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[20]
findingactivating M2 terminals in resting mice reproduced the movement-like dynamics
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[21]
findingsilencing ipsilateral M2 restored rest-like dynamics within about 70 ms, while contralateral silencing did nothing until movement stopped
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[22]
findingAPPORTIONED, NOT EXCLUDED: about 60 percent of the suppression arises inside auditory cortex, measured from the slope relating optogenetic to tone suppression
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[23]
findingASSAY VALIDATED BEFORE THE NULL: high-frequency stimulation was shown to reduce EPSP onset slope before the absence of such a change during movement was claimed
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[24]
findingCONTROL NULL: EPSP onset slope did not differ between movement and rest, so thalamic terminals are not depressed during movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[25]
findingCONFOUND EXCLUDED TWO WAYS: the terminal-activation effect survived TTX silencing of M2 somata and was faster than antidromic propagation
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[26]
findingDECOUPLING EXPERIMENT: with ipsilateral M2 silenced the cortex returned to a rest-like state while the mouse was still moving, and tones then recovered about 40 percent of their response
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[27]
findingthe decoupling separates the neural state from the movement itself and shows the state controls the gain
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[28]
findingsilencing M2 in a resting mouse slightly enhanced tone responses, so even baseline M2 activity is mildly suppressive
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[29]
quantityslope = 0.6 — Linear relation between suppression of optogenetically evoked and tone-evoked responses, implying ~60% of suppression is cortex-local
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[0]
quantity>200 ms — Average lead time by which auditory cortical membrane potential changes precede locomotion onset
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[1]
quantity−805 ms for PV+ cells, −605 ms for VGAT+ cells, and −490 ms for excitatory cells — Times relative to movement onset at which each cell population's firing rate changed
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[2]
quantity−870 ms — Time relative to movement onset at which M2 excitatory neuron firing increased
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[3]
quantity~ −72 mV — Reversal potential of the movement-related membrane potential change, near the chloride equilibrium potential
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[4]
quantity<7 ms — Latency of auditory cortical change after M2 terminal stimulation, versus ~12 ms antidromic propagation time
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[5]
quantity~500 ms — Delay after light onset at which silencing M2 arrested the animal's movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[6]
quantity~40 percent — Recovery of tone-evoked response when ipsilateral M2 was silenced during ongoing movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[7]
quantity14.25 min — Mean duration of the intracellular recordings in freely behaving mice
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[8]
quantityn = 37 cells from 11 mice — Sample for the treadmill comparison of membrane potential variance at rest versus movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[9]
quantityp = 8e-9 — Significance of the drop in tone-evoked voltage area from rest to movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[10]
quantitymore than 200 ms — how far the auditory cortical change precedes locomotion onset
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[11]
quantityabout 60 percent — share of movement-related suppression arising locally in auditory cortex
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[12]
quantity-72 mV — reversal potential of the movement-related change, near the chloride equilibrium
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[13]
quantityunder 7 ms against about 12 ms — onset of the terminal-activation effect against antidromic propagation time
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[14]
quantityabout 40 percent — recovery of tone-evoked responses when M2 is silenced during ongoing movement
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[15]
quantityabout 70 ms — delay before ipsilateral M2 silencing restored rest-like cortical dynamics
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[16]
variablemovement (independent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[0]
variablelaser stimulation (independent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[1]
variablemembrane potential variability (dependent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[2]
variablepeak tone-evoked response (dependent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[3]
variablebody temperature (control)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[4]
variablemembrane potential
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[6]
variableonset slope
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[7]
variablelocomotion
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[8]
definitioncorollary discharge signals
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[0]
definitionM2 ACtx cells
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[1]
definitioncorollary discharge
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[2]
definitiononset slope
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[3]
definitionantidromic
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[4]
key-termscorollary discharge, auditory cortex, M2, PV+, reafference, thalamocortical, antidromic, presynaptic depression, onset slope, visual cortex, locomotion, TTX
Statistics — cross-field join keys
field-invariant statistical terms, used in their statistical sense (gated on a number / symbol / test). A p-value or a standard deviation means the SAME thing in physics, biology, psychology and sociology — so these are the strongest cross-field join keys. Grounded verbatim.
t-test as written: Student’s t-test, paired t-test and Two-sampled t-test
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[0]
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as written: tests for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[1]
significance level (alpha) alpha as written: significance was measured against alpha of 0.05
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[2]
ANOVA as written: two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[3]
interaction effect p as written: significant interaction terms (p<0.05)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[4]
standard deviation s.d. as written: population mean +/− s.d. values
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[5]
percentile threshold as written: calculating the 95 th percentile of baseline firing rates
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[6]
linear regression / slope slope as written: linearly related ... (slope = 0.6)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[7]
linearly related
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[8]
Second readings
a facet read a second time, independently, from its own sentence — and whether the two readings agree
claim typemechanism — a second reading reaching the same value; recorded: mechanism
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
alternatives.claim_type
methodsharp-electrode intracellular recording in freely behaving and head-fixed mice, with optogenetic activation and silencing, multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: electrophysiology
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
alternatives.method
phenomenonsuppression of auditory cortical responses before and during movement — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: motor-related corollary discharge in auditory cortex
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
alternatives.phenomenon

When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.

Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification. · back to index · concepts · authors · עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824