x 10 9 may be x 10⁹, chi 2 5 may be chi-squared with five degrees of freedom, and 1 2 may be one half. Read any expression here against the published paper before relying on it.standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 3 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the direct ventral hippocampus to medial prefrontal cortex projection during spatial working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | which phase of spatial working memory requires this pathway, what it carries, and by what anatomical route Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | shows the pathway is needed for encoding but not maintenance or retrieval, both behaviourally and in the prefrontal representation, with gamma synchrony as the carrier Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | spatial working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | vHPC input drives a selective firing-rate elevation in each unit's preferred goal, without changing baseline rates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the same goal selectivity persists during choice runs and no longer needs vHPC input, so physiology mirrors the behavioural dissociation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | vHPC gamma leads mPFC spiking at lags consistent with monosynaptic transmission, and terminal inhibition reduces that phase-locking Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the directionality is specific to gamma: in theta the mPFC leads, and theta synchrony survives terminal inhibition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | terminal illumination suppresses transmission without silencing the source cells, which is what makes the manipulation projection-specific Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a four-goal maze prevents the animal from forming a spatially directed plan until the choice phase, which is what separates encoding from retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The authors cannot definitively exclude an effect of terminal inhibition during the choice (retrieval) phase; the null result there was underpowered. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the encoding claim as against the choice phase: ALTHOUGH WE CANNOT CONCLUSIVELY RULE OUT AN EFFECT OF TERMINAL INHIBITION DURING CHOICE, THESE EXPERIMENTS INDICATE THAT INPUT FROM THE vHPC TO THE mPFC IS CRITICAL FOR ENCODING | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Retrospective location coding might exist in mPFC in a form their decoding analysis could not detect (e.g. synaptic weights or very brief reactivation). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the absence of retrospective coding, which is scoped to the ANALYSIS: IT IS NOT DETECTABLE USING THE ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES PRESENTED HERE, SUCH AS in synaptic weights or in reactivation too brief for the bins | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The pseudo-population decoding approach assumes comparable spike statistics across animals and sessions and discards correlated variability. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every population-decoding result: THIS APPROACH ASSUMES EQUIVALENT SPIKE STATISTICS ACROSS ANIMALS AND RECORDING SESSIONS, AND IGNORES POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO POPULATION CODING FROM CORRELATED SPIKE VARIABILITY | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The gamma phase-locking effect is small: under 10% of mPFC units were significantly phase-locked even at the best lag. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the gamma phase-locking claim, with its size: AT THE LAG WITH THE GREATEST PHASE-LOCKING, FEWER THAN 10% OF mPFC UNITS WERE SIGNIFICANTLY PHASE-LOCKED TO vHPC GAMMA | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the choice-phase null is not conclusive; an n of 37 per group would have been needed to detect the observed effect size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the choice-phase null, with what it would have taken to see the effect: A SLIGHT TREND TOWARD IMPAIRMENT DID NOT REACH SIGNIFICANCE, AND POST-HOC POWER ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT AN n OF 37 PER GROUP would have been required | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the authors state plainly that they cannot conclusively rule out an effect during choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - an effect during choice is not conclusively excluded | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the absence of retrospective coding is scoped to the analysis: it could be held in synaptic weights or in reactivation too brief to decode from binned histograms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - the null on retrospective coding is a null of the method | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the gamma effect is subtle - fewer than 10% of mPFC units were significantly phase-locked at the best lag Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[3] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[3] - under 10% of units, at the best lag | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the promoter was changed between the two behavioural experiments, so they are not methodologically identical Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison BETWEEN the two behavioural experiments: THE hSYNAPSIN PROMOTER WAS CHOSEN FOR THE 4-GOAL EXPERIMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE LONG-RANGE GABAERGIC vHPC-mPFC PROJECTIONS AND TO AVOID POTENTIAL TOXICITY EFFECTS - so they differ in more than the goal count | limitations[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | male mice only Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any sex-general reading: MALE C57BL/6 MICE (JACKSON LABS) WERE USED FOR ALL EXPERIMENTS | limitations[9] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the theta result ran counter to the authors' initial hypotheses and is reported as such Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the theta result specifically: THE FINDING THAT mPFC THETA ACTIVITY LEADS vHPC THETA, AND THAT THETA SYNCHRONY BETWEEN THE TWO STRUCTURES DID NOT APPEAR TO DEPEND UPON vHPC-mPFC AFFERENTS, RAN COUNTER TO OUR INITIAL HYPOTHESES | limitations[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | delay-period persistent firing as the expected mechanism, imported and then not found in the rodent homologue Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | a maximum margin linear classifier with cross-validation, used to read location from distributed population rates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a CamKIIα-mCherry virus carrying no opsin, run in the acute stimulation/silencing and 2-goal t-maze experiments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the light delivery and the viral infection themselves as the cause of the behavioural effect - the exclusion is carried by the term OPSIN-NEGATIVE CONTROL rather than spelled out · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the researcher who trained and ran the mice was blinded to viral group by a second lab member, who did the assignment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the experimenter's knowledge of which animals carried the opsin influencing training or scoring · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| senses | encoding, maintenance and retrieval are defined by TRIAL PHASE and made separable by a maze redesign - the distinction is built into the apparatus, not read off the behaviour Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | projection-specific means the terminals are silenced where they arrive, not the cells that send them - validated by showing vHPC firing is untouched by mPFC illumination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | no evidence of retrospective coding is scoped explicitly to the analytic technique, naming two forms it could take and still be missed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | functionally analogous but anatomically distinct - the stated relation between primate dorsolateral PFC and rodent prelimbic cortex, which licenses comparing them cautiously Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | method: projection-specific optogenetic terminal inhibition with archaerhodopsin, timed to single trial phases, combined with prefrontal single-unit recording and population decoding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: phase-specific long-range routing of spatial information during working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: spatial working memory — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Wang et al., 2006 (adaptive intra-trial delay procedure for the T-maze task) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | qualifies → prior reports of retrospective and prospective location coding in rodent mPFC during delays Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | reinterprets → the earlier finding that vHPC silencing reduces dHPC-mPFC theta synchrony, proposing it was an indirect effect on dHPC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → work implicating vHPC and mPFC in contextual learning, by moving it to a seconds timescale Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → persistent prefrontal firing as the mechanism maintaining the cue between encoding and retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | encoding —contrasted-with→ retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS WHICH PHASE OF THE MEMORY THE PATHWAY IS NEEDED FOR, AND THREE PHASES ARE NAMED. 'Quotation withheld.' The same anatomy is necessary at one moment of a trial and dispensable at the others - so a lesion or inactivation that spans the whole trial cannot produce this result, and studies that do span it will report the pathway as generally required. · strength of the relation: 1 | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | gamma —contrasted-with→ theta Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS FREQUENCY BAND, AND THE DIRECTION OF FLOW REVERSES WITH IT. 'Quotation withheld.' The same two structures lead each other in opposite directions depending on the band - so a connectivity claim without the band is not merely imprecise, it is ambiguous between two opposite claims. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: opposite directionality between the same two structures, and only gamma depends on the direct pathway | concept_edges[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | gamma —operationalised-as→ pairwise phase consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but long-range gamma synchrony was quantified with pairwise phase consistency; operationalised-as is loose. also in: gamma · pairwise phase consistency | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | repeated-measures ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repeated-measures ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | paired t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: paired t-test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | significance threshold (alpha) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: significance threshold (alpha) | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Rayleigh test of circular uniformity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Rayleigh test of circular uniformity | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | pairwise phase consistency (spike-field phase-locking measure) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | linear classifier / population decoding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cross-validation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-validation | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | resampling with replacement (bootstrap) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | statistical power analysis / effect size Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | maximum margin linear classifier, cross-validated Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | pairwise phase consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: pairwise phase consistency | content_tags.statistics[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Rayleigh's test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Rayleigh's test | content_tags.statistics[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | post-hoc power analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: post-hoc power analysis | content_tags.statistics[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Optogenetically silencing vHPC-to-mPFC terminals during the sample run impairs delayed non-match-to-place performance in opsin-expressing mice, while the same silencing during the entire trial also impairs it and silencing during choice does not reach significance. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Sample-phase silencing again impaired performance, confirming the pathway is required during encoding. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Silencing the pathway during the memory delay produced no significant behavioural impairment. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Population decoding of the sample goal from mPFC units was abolished (reduced to chance) by terminal illumination in Arch-expressing mice but was unchanged in Arch-negative controls. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Sample-phase terminal inhibition removed the firing-rate increase that goal-selective mPFC units show at their preferred goal, while leaving their baseline rates intact. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | During choice runs the same goal-selective firing-rate elevation persisted despite terminal inhibition, so mPFC location coding at retrieval does not need the direct vHPC input. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Terminal inhibition did not change overall mPFC firing rates, either pooled or split into putative pyramidal cells and interneurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A decoder trained on no-light trials was unaffected when tested on sample-light trials, suggesting terminal inhibition does not generally interfere with encoding of task-relevant information. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | A subset of mPFC units phase-locked to vHPC gamma, and phase-locking was strongest at lags where vHPC gamma preceded mPFC spiking, indicating vHPC leads mPFC in the gamma band. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Inhibiting the vHPC-mPFC terminals weakened gamma phase-locking, showing the long-range gamma synchrony depends on the direct anatomical projection. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In the theta band the directionality reversed - mPFC led vHPC - and theta synchrony was not affected by silencing the pathway. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Gamma phase-locking was stronger during sample runs than choice runs, associating it with the encoding phase. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Additionally, gamma phase-locking during sample runs distinguished correct from incorrect trials. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The mPFC showed no retrospective coding of the previously visited location. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | inhibiting the direct pathway during the delay produced no significant impairment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sample goal is decoded from prefrontal population activity at 96% on arrival at the goal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | inhibiting the pathway during encoding drops that decoding to chance in opsin-expressing animals only Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the same manipulation leaves task-phase decoding unaffected, so it does not generally impair encoding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | overall mPFC firing rates are unchanged by terminal illumination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | goal selectivity during choice runs survives the same inhibition, mirroring the behaviour Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a subset of mPFC units phase-lock to vHPC gamma, most at lags where vHPC gamma precedes mPFC spiking Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | in theta the direction reverses and synchrony is unaffected by the same manipulation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | gamma phase-locking is stronger on sample than choice runs, and stronger on correct than incorrect trials Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | no retrospective location coding was found in mPFC during the delay Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[23] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spatial working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spatial working memory | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | vHPC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: vHPC | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sample phase Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sample phase | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | delay phase Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: delay phase | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | preferred goal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: preferred goal | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spatial working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spatial working memory | content_tags.definitions[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | lag analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lag analysis | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | opsin-negative control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: opsin-negative control | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | intra-trial delay Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: intra-trial delay | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | firing rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: firing rate | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | gamma phase-locking Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gamma phase-locking | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 4-goal T-maze Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 4-goal T-maze | content_tags.variables[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sample goal identity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sample goal identity | content_tags.variables[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 792 — well-isolated mPFC single units recorded, from 9 mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 44% — share of mPFC single units showing selectivity for a spatial dimension distinguishing the goal arms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 96% — peak accuracy of decoding the sample goal from the mPFC population, at arrival at the reward port Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.98 — accuracy of decoding task phase (sample vs choice) at the moment the start-box doors opened Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~40% — reduction of the vHPC-evoked postsynaptic multiunit response in mPFC by terminal illumination in Arch+ mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~50% — reduction of spontaneous multiunit activity when light was delivered to vHPC cell bodies (versus no effect on vHPC when only terminals were illuminated) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 1.48 — effect size for the behavioural impairment in Arch+ mice in the 4-goal experiment, with 90% power at N of 7 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | n of 37 animals/group — sample size a post-hoc power analysis says would be needed to detect the choice-phase effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | fewer than 10% — proportion of mPFC units significantly phase-locked to vHPC gamma at the best lag Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t=−3.91, p=0.001 — test of the performance difference between trials where sample and choice goals matched in the left/right dimension (0.65) and where they differed (0.71) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: FLATTENED EXPONENT IN THIS QUOTE - THE NUMBER IS WRONG BY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE AS IT STANDS. The staged text reads '4.0 × 10 3', where the paper writes 10 to the power 3. The superscript was pushed onto the line by the PDF extractor. The quote is verbatim to the staged text and its anchor is sound; the STAGED TEXT is what is damaged. NOT repaired - repair means re-staging the body and re-anchoring the record. | content_tags.quantities[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 792 well-isolated single units from 9 mice, 44% spatially selective — the recorded sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 40% reduction in evoked response, about 50% reduction in local activity at the source — validation of the terminal inhibition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 96% — peak decoding accuracy for sample goal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 0.98 — task-phase decoding accuracy, the specificity control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[13] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | n of 37 animals per group — what would have been needed to detect the choice-phase effect - the null is quantified rather than asserted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | effect size 1.48, power 90% at N=7 and 83% at N=6 — the power behind the positive result Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | fewer than 10% of mPFC units — how many were significantly phase-locked at the best lag Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.