standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 1 of 10 relations here carries that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | whether the ordered firing of CA1 neurons during ripples is imported from CA3 or assembled locally Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether sequences survive when the usual upstream driver is bypassed and the same neurons are activated directly by light Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | shows that sequence order is partly preserved across theta, spontaneous ripples and optically induced ripples, and that interneuron spiking is what carries the consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | multineuronal spike sequences in hippocampal CA1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: We hypothesize that | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | even if every neuron received an identical ramp of input current, diverse and sequential spiking would still follow from intrinsic neuronal and circuit heterogeneity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | interneurons are each controlled by a few pyramidal assemblies and suppress the rest, which is why they appear in orderly positions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the proposal is a three-way intersection: sequential drive from CA3, spread of intrinsic cellular properties, and differences in local connectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the preexisting order may itself be the residue of earlier experience or of development, which the design cannot separate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Only a limited number of pyramidal cells could be monitored with silicon probes; larger ensemble recordings are needed to test the hypothesis. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the completeness of every sequence reported: MANY MORE PYRAMIDAL NEURONS TOOK PART IN THE SEQUENTIAL PATTERNING OF ACTIVITY THAN THOSE MONITORED HERE BY THE SILICON PROBES | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The theta/ripple correlation results on their own cannot separate a CA3 from a CA1 origin of the sequences. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the local-generation claim: SEQUENCES MAY BE GENERATED BY THE UPSTREAM CA3 REGION OR LOCALLY IN CA1 BUT THESE RESULTS ALONE CANNOT DISAMBIGUATE THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE TWO REGIONS | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The measured sequence consistency is loose - rank correlations were widely spread and rarely above 0.5. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: how tightly the sequences repeat: RANK CORRELATIONS WERE WIDELY DISTRIBUTED AND RARELY EXCEEDED VALUES OF 0.5 ... INDICATING RELATIVELY LOOSE SELF- AND CROSS-CLASS CONSISTENCY | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the theta-ripple correlation alone cannot disambiguate the contributions of CA3 and of CA1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[1] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[1] - CA3 and CA1 origins are not separated by these correlations | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | far more pyramidal cells probably participate than the probes could record, and larger ensembles are needed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - larger ensemble recordings are needed to test the hypothesis | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | with pyramidal cells alone the cross-class correlation is not significant - though the paper notes the same holds within a single condition Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the pyramidal-only analysis: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SPONTANEOUS AND INDUCED OSCILLATIONS WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT. HOWEVER, THIS WAS ALSO THE CASE WHEN SEQUENCE PATTERNS WERE CORRELATED WITHIN THE SAME CONDITIONS | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | whether the preexisting order reflects experience or development is not addressed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the origin of the preexisting order: THE PREEXISTING SEQUENCES MAY THEMSELVES REFLECT THE LOCAL CIRCUIT CONFIGURATIONS SHAPED BY PREVIOUS EXPERIENCES, BY THE DEVELOPMENTAL GENETIC PROGRAM, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF | limitations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | rank-order templates with permutation-based significance, used so that sequence order can be tested without assuming timing distributions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | direct local activation used specifically to bypass the upstream input whose contribution is in question Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | short events under 15 ms discarded and adjacent events with gaps under 15 ms merged, before the sequence analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: one event being counted as two, or noise being counted as an event, in a measure built on counting events · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | CA3 → CA1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. THE TWO CANNOT BE SEPARATED IN THIS STUDY - the DESIGN form of the negative relation / No edge type can express it: all eight assert that a relation HOLDS. A confounding statement bounds what the paper's own results can mean, and it lives where nothing downstream will find it. THE SAME PAIR DRIEU2019 WAS MIS-READ AS CONTRASTING. 'Quotation withheld' One paper cannot separate them; another paper's glossary was read as distinguishing them. The corpus now holds the inability next to the mistake. | unhoused_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| senses | synthetic ripple is the same construct Stark2014 named iHFO and Wu2015 reused - an optically induced high-frequency oscillation, kept terminologically apart from the spontaneous ripple throughout Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | sequence consistency here is a RANK correlation between the firing order in one event and a template built from other events, so it measures order and not timing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | self-consistency (order repeats within a class of events) and cross-class consistency (order carries between classes) are different measures, and the paper's claim rests on the second Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | spike gain is the same within-unit ratio used in Wu2015 - rate during the event over baseline rate - so the two records are comparable on this measure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | PYR and INT are assigned by a Gaussian mixture model over waveform features, the same classification route as Wu2015 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading reaching the same value. Recorded: mechanism — note: a second reading reaching the same value from a different sentence. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: simultaneous multi-site recording with per-shank light delivery in freely moving and anaesthetised mice, with rank-order sequence templates and permutation tests Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: recurring order of firing across a population of CA1 neurons within an oscillatory event Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: multineuronal spike sequences in hippocampal CA1 — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → The authors' own earlier demonstration (ref. 26) that local optogenetic stimulation of CA1 pyramidal cells induces fast LFP oscillations resembling spontaneous ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → The prevailing assumption (refs 4, 12, 16, 21, 23) that CA1 sequential firing during ripples and theta is generated in CA3 recurrent networks and inherited synaptically by CA1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own words: has not been shown | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | replicates → A previous study (ref. 34) of the stability of sequential activation of pyramidal cells and interneurons during neocortical slow oscillations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the tacit assumption that CA1 ripple sequences are synaptically inherited from CA3 assemblies Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → Stark et al. 2014, which showed local optogenetic activation is sufficient to induce ripple-like oscillations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the inference from waking-sleep correlation to experience-induced synaptic plasticity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | supports → preplay reports of correlations present before a novel experience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | confirms → neocortical work finding stable pyramidal-interneuron sequences during slow oscillations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · INT —causes→ consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span attested 'INT' only inside 'interneurons'. The paper defines INT as its label for interneurons and uses it 46 times; this sentence writes it as a word and states the effect on consistency with its size. — strength of the relation: 1 · note: 12% of the units carry the sequence; dropping them sends cross-class consistency to chance
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but interneurons made a large contribution to sequence consistency; causes is loose. also in: INT · consistency | concept_edges[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · consistency —operationalised-as→ permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span described the ranking procedure. This sentence names both and states the test outright - '…CONSISTENCY was determined BY A PERMUTATION TEST, randomly…'. — strength of the relation: 1 · note: significance comes from shuffling unit labels, so the null is order-specific rather than rate-specific
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but sequence consistency was tested with a permutation test; operationalised-as is loose. also in: consistency · permutation test | concept_edges[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED FROM AN INFERENCE TO THE INTERVENTION IT RESTS ON) · CA1 —causes→ spike sequences Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED FROM AN INFERENCE TO THE INTERVENTION IT RESTS ON. The old span reports a conclusion - 'These results INDICATE…' that mechanisms in CA1 contribute to ripple- and theta-associated sequences - which names one endpoint and hedges the mechanism (mechanisms confined to CA1). The replacement is the experiment: 'We show that OPTOGENETIC ACTIVATION…' of a small group of CA1 pyramidal cells yields consistent spike sequences. A manipulation and its result, both endpoints named. For a 'causes' edge an intervention is better evidence than an inference drawn from one. — strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: the paper's own claim: local mechanisms contribute, not that CA3 does not
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'neuronal sequences' / 'sequential spiking patterns', not 'spike sequences'. also in: CA1 · spike sequences | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | replay —contrasted-with→ preplay Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: the warning this paper leaves the field: a correlation read as learning may predate the learning
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span is cut before the replay-preplay contrast. | concept_edges[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | PYR —contrasted-with→ INT Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the 4.7-fold against 1.8-fold rate rise is the evidence that light drove PYR directly and INT through the circuit | concept_edges[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | EVIDENCE CORRECTED (RE-GROUNDED) · theta —contrasted-with→ spontaneous ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. EVIDENCE CORRECTED: RE-GROUNDED. The old span set up a comparison without naming its terms. This sentence names them as the study's own design - '…during THETA oscillations, SPONTANEOUS RIPPLES, and focal…' - so the contrast is the experiment rather than an observation about it. — strength of the relation: 1 · note: two states with different drivers whose sequences nonetheless match, which is what motivates the local-circuit hypothesis
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span compares ripple sequences with theta cycles; contrasted-with is loose. also in: theta · spontaneous ripples | concept_edges[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | INT —causes→ consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record:, the endpoint was attested mid-word.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but including interneurons doubles cross-class consistency; causes is loose. also in: INT · consistency | concept_edges[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | consistency —operationalised-as→ permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but significance of consistency was determined by permutation; operationalised-as is loose. also in: consistency · permutation test | concept_edges[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | theta —contrasted-with→ spontaneous ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: RE-GROUNDS another row of this record: the old span named ONE endpoint.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span lists the three conditions the study compared; contrasted-with is loose. also in: theta · spontaneous ripples | concept_edges[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | CA1 —causes→ spike sequences Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.9 also in: CA1 · spike sequences | concept_edges[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | rank correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rank correlation | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permutation test | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon signed-rank test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon signed-rank test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | binomial test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: binomial test | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Mann-Whitney U test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Mann-Whitney U test | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Kruskal-Wallis test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Kruskal-Wallis test | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | circular correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: circular correlation | content_tags.statistics[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | chi-squared test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: chi-squared test | content_tags.statistics[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cross-validation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-validation | content_tags.statistics[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Gaussian mixture model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Gaussian mixture model | content_tags.statistics[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis | content_tags.statistics[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | significance level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: significance level | content_tags.statistics[11] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | permutation test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permutation test | content_tags.statistics[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | rank correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rank correlation | content_tags.statistics[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Wilcoxon Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Wilcoxon | content_tags.statistics[14] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | exact Binomial test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: exact Binomial test | content_tags.statistics[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Rayleigh test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Rayleigh test | content_tags.statistics[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Mann-Whitney U test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Mann-Whitney U test | content_tags.statistics[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Individual neurons' firing rates, their rate modulation, and the order in which pyramidal cells and interneurons fired were all correlated across three different network states: theta oscillations, spontaneous ripples, and optogenetically induced ripples. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Because sequences recur during locally induced ripples that receive no CA3 or entorhinal patterning, the sequential order of CA1 spiking cannot be purely inherited from upstream regions and must partly arise from CA1's own circuitry and single-cell biophysics. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Half of the optogenetically induced spike sequences matched the spontaneous ripple sequence recorded at the same site, with a median rank correlation of 0.13. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Interneurons made up only 12% of the participating units and were only indirectly driven by the light, yet they contributed importantly to sequence consistency in both spontaneous and induced ripples. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | With pyramidal cells alone the correlation between theta-cycle and ripple sequence order dropped to chance, so the shared ordering across states depends on including interneurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The preferred firing phase of each unit within the ripple cycle was the same for spontaneous and light-induced ripples, so cycle-level spike timing is conserved between the two. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Sequence consistency was real but weak: rank correlations were broadly spread and seldom above 0.5, and the same conclusions followed whether a template or a pairwise comparison method was used. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Under anaesthesia, spontaneous and induced sequences were not consistent with each other. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | firing rates during theta and during ripples were correlated neuron by neuron Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sequences recorded during ripples matched those during theta cycles in 10 of 11 sessions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spike phase within the cycle was preserved between spontaneous and induced ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | pyramidal cells fired about 1.8 ms before interneurons on each ripple cycle Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | sequences repeated across spontaneous ripple events at 23 of 27 recording sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | half the induced sequences matched their own site's spontaneous sequences Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | theta sequences and induced-ripple sequences also matched, at 10 of 25 sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | with interneurons alone, sequences stayed consistent across classes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | interneurons are 12% of the units and carry the consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | in the pyramidal-only session analysis three sessions were consistent and three were REVERSED, so the group mean describes neither Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CONTROL NULL: illumination of an opsin-free mouse produced no spikes, no oscillations and no artefact Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CONTROL: induced-ripple rates track spontaneous rates, so the induced pattern is not set by opsin level or distance from the light Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spontaneous and induced ripples occurred predominantly in the same brain state Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SCOPE TO CHECK: the main text reports similar results under anaesthesia, and the supplementary caption it cites states cross-class sequences are NOT consistent there Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | SCOPE TO CHECK, second half: the supplementary figure caption states plainly that spontaneous and induced sequences are not consistent under anaesthesia Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[22] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | synthetic ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: synthetic ripples | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: gain | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cross-class consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cross-class consistency | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | threshold intensity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: threshold intensity | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spike gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spike gain | content_tags.definitions[5] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: consistency | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | synthetic ripples Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: synthetic ripples | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | preplay Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: preplay | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | light stimulation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: light stimulation | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | rank correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rank correlation | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | light intensity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: light intensity | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | consistency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: consistency | content_tags.variables[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | spike gain Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spike gain | content_tags.variables[6] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | phase Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: phase | content_tags.variables[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 5.1-fold — increase in pyramidal cell firing rate during spontaneous ripples, versus 4.1-fold for interneurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 582 — total well-isolated CA1 cells recorded across freely moving and anaesthetized mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 56 — recording sites that met the criteria for sequence analysis, across 16 sessions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.28 — median rank correlation quantifying self-consistency of multineuronal sequences during spontaneous ripples (85% of sites significant) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 3.4 times — factor by which cross-class rank correlations dropped when interneurons were excluded and only pyramidal cells were used Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 156 ± 1.7°, 254 ± 6.7° — mean preferred ripple-cycle phases of pyramidal cells and interneurons, a 1.8 ms lag Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 13 of 26 (50%) — induced-ripple sequences that were consistent with the spontaneous ripple sequence at the same site Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 268 and 37 — pyramidal cells and interneurons recorded from four freely moving mice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 12% — share of participating units that are interneurons, which nonetheless carry the sequence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 1.8 ms — lead of pyramidal over interneuron spiking within a ripple cycle Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 4.7-fold vs 1.8-fold — rate increase of pyramidal cells against interneurons during induced ripples - the signature of direct versus indirect drive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 3 and 3 — sessions with consistent and with reversed pyramidal-only sequences, out of eleven Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.