Tonotopic Organization of the Superior Olivary Nucleus in the Chicken Auditory Brainstem

Tabor, Coleman, Rubel, Burger · The Journal of comparative neurology · 2012 · neuroscience · 10.1002/cne.22807 · record Tabor2012-tonotopic-organization-of-the-superior-oliva
tag layer · index · concepts · authors · עברית

Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (xml); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. Claim type is 'existence' because the three headline conclusions assert that a particular spatial arrangement exists in SON; the paper also has a strong methodological component (3D quantitative mapping with PCA and multilinear regression offered as a broadly applicable tool), which the single claim type facet cannot represent. Two of the nineteen cases showed no tonotopic organization at all, which the paper attributes to sampling; the facets do not capture this partial negative result. 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-25 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.

How to read this page. The article itself is not reproduced here — this paper is not cleared for redistribution, so what follows is the tag layer alone. The evidence sentences are withheld with the article. The table at the foot lists every tag the record carries; each row names the facet it belongs to, and the whose words column says whether the tag records the paper's own wording or the tagger's sentence about the paper. Every tag links to each other paper in the corpus carrying it. The machine-readable edition of the same thing is the TEI file beside this one, where the tags live in standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.

Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
principal component analysis 5 fields · standard deviation 3 fields

Tags on this paper

Every tag the record carries, each linking to every other paper in the corpus that carries it. A tag appears here whether or not its words occur in the article — the spans below are only the ones a sentence in this paper licenses. Of the 13 concept tags on this paper, 3 are grounded in a quoted sentence. All carry the tagger's gloss of what the term means in this paper, which is not something the article can license.

tonotopic topographic organization superior olivary nucleus characteristic frequency Q10 response threshold onset sustained principal component analysis multiple-unit nucleus laminaris nucleus angularis isofrequency SON response patterns are inherited from its nucleus angularis input, which is why sustained and onset types and diverse tuning shapes appear there the narrow hearing range of the chicken makes the frequency-to-place function linear rather than logarithmic summation of individually subthreshold spike waveforms raises the apparent threshold of multiple-unit recordings the broad, non-restricted SON to nucleus laminaris projection supplies the anatomical substrate by which inhibition laterally sharpens frequency tuning inhibitory GABA chicken brainstem MRA coefficient of determination 3D reconstruction sound localization characteristic frequency (CF) center of mass of recording sites tonotopic map body temperature normalized distances response patterns normalized medial-lateral coordinate normalized dorsal-ventral coordinate axis normalized anterior-posterior coordinate regression Multilinear regression analysis (MRA) Principle component analysis (PCA) eigen-decomposition of the covariance matrix eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the covariance matrix t-test standard deviation mean ± SD multiple regression analysis of CF on 3D position error magnitude between predicted and measured CF electrophysiology

Legend

second reading	`alternatives`	an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees
relation to other work	`claim_relations`	how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies
claim type	`claim_type`	the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null
concept edge	`concept_edges`	an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it
concept	`concepts`	an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it
content tag	`content_tags`	a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper
contribution	`contribution`	what the paper claims to add
control	`controls`	an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation
limitation	`limitations`	what the paper says its evidence cannot support
mechanism	`mechanisms`	how the reported effect is said to come about
method	`method`	how the paper produced its evidence
object of study	`object_of_study`	what the paper is about — the thing it investigates
phenomenon	`phenomenon`	the effect or regularity under study
research question	`research_question`	the question the paper sets itself
sense	`senses`	a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it
transfer	`transfers`	a method or concept carried in from another field

The paper

The full text is not reproduced here. This article is not cleared for redistribution, so the page carries the tag layer only. Its evidence sentences are withheld; the grounding status remains with each tag, and the article itself is at https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22807. The reading view exists for the papers whose licence permits it.

Every tag on this page

alternatives 2 · claim_relations 7 · claim_type 1 · concept_edges 2 · concepts 3 · content_tags 59 · contribution 1 · controls 1 · limitations 10 · mechanisms 8 · method 1 · object_of_study 1 · phenomenon 1 · research_question 1 · senses 4 · transfers 1

Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.

facet	tag	field	conf.	whose words
object_of_study	the topographic organisation of frequency and of response types in the chicken superior olivary nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`object_of_study`		the paper's words
research_question	whether the tonotopic organisation of the auditory brainstem is preserved in an inhibitory long-range projection nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`research_question`		the paper's words
contribution	quantifies tonotopy in an inhibitory nucleus, shows it is less precise than in excitatory nuclei of the same species, and gives a predictive model from position to best frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`contribution`		the paper's words
claim_type	existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_type`		the paper's words
phenomenon	tonotopic organization of an inhibitory auditory brainstem nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`phenomenon`		the paper's words
method	electrophysiology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: electrophysiology	`method`		the paper's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SON response patterns are inherited from its nucleus angularis input, which is why sustained and onset types and diverse tuning shapes appear there	`mechanisms[0]`		the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the narrow hearing range of the chicken makes the frequency-to-place function linear rather than logarithmic	`mechanisms[1]`		the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: summation of individually subthreshold spike waveforms raises the apparent threshold of multiple-unit recordings	`mechanisms[2]`		the tagger's words
mechanisms	mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the broad, non-restricted SON to nucleus laminaris projection supplies the anatomical substrate by which inhibition laterally sharpens frequency tuning	`mechanisms[3]`		the tagger's words
mechanisms	inhibitory neurons in this system sit in a discrete projection nucleus rather than among principal cells, which is what makes their organisation separable at all Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`mechanisms[4]`	1.0	the tagger's words
mechanisms	recording sites are located by electrolytic lesions and electrode tracks, then normalised into a common 3D nucleus so cases can be combined Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`mechanisms[5]`	1.0	the tagger's words
mechanisms	PCA is run first because it was unknown whether the map was linear or nonlinear, single or multiple gradients Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`mechanisms[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
mechanisms	SON inhibition widens dynamic range and sharpens temporal coding for sound localisation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`mechanisms[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	Threshold comparisons between sustained and onset responders may not be valid because the spike-rate criterion may not be equally sensitive across response categories. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: threshold comparisons between response types only: CAUTION SHOULD BE USED WHEN COMPARING THRESHOLDS BETWEEN SUSTAINED AND ONSET RESPONDERS BECAUSE THE SPIKE RATE CRITERION USED TO DETERMINE RESPONSE THRESHOLD differs in effect between them	`limitations[0]`		the tagger's words
limitations	Binaural response properties of SON neurons were not assessed, so a possible contribution of the nucleus laminaris projection remains unexplored. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any claim about the origin of SON response properties: WE DID NOT ASSESS THE BINAURAL RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF SON NEURONS, so NL's projection remains an unexplored contribution	`limitations[1]`		the tagger's words
limitations	In most animals only a limited region of the SON was sampled, which is why individual maps had to be combined into a standardized SON. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the tonotopic map as a whole-nucleus claim: IN MOST SUBJECTS WE SAMPLED A LIMITED REGION OF THE SON, which is why individual maps had to be combined	`limitations[2]`		the tagger's words
limitations	the map is explicitly less precise than in excitatory nuclei of the same species, by both error magnitude and r-squared Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any use of this map at the precision expected of excitatory nuclei: the paper states its map is the less precise of the two by both error magnitude and its own comparison	`limitations[3]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	prediction error varies widely along the tonotopic axis rather than being uniform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the tonotopic prediction at any single site: ERROR MAGNITUDE (\|CF_predicted - CF_measured\|) VARIED WIDELY AT EACH POSITION ALONG THE CALCULATED TONOTOPIC AXIS	`limitations[4]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	the threshold criterion may not be equally sensitive across response categories, so between-category threshold comparisons are cautioned against Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. duplicate of: limitations[0] · what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - the threshold criterion may not be equally sensitive across response categories, so between-category threshold comparisons are the affected ones	`limitations[5]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	multi-unit thresholds run higher than single-unit thresholds because sub-threshold waveforms sum Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison of thresholds between recording types: THRESHOLDS OF MULTIPLE-UNIT RESPONSES TENDED TO BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE THRESHOLDS OF ISOLATED NEURONAL RESPONSES ... THIS INCREASE REFLECTS ... WAVEFORMS THAT INDIVIDUALLY WERE NOT DETECTED	`limitations[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	suppressed responders were too rare to analyse spatially Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the spatial claims for suppressed responders: SUPPRESSED RESPONDERS WERE ENCOUNTERED TOO INFREQUENTLY TO ASSESS THEIR SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION	`limitations[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
limitations	in most animals only a limited region of the nucleus was sampled, which is why standardisation was needed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every position reported in the standardised frame: in most animals only a limited region was sampled, so LOCATIONS OF THE RECORDING SITES WERE CONVERTED INTO NORMALIZED DISTANCES ALONG THREE ORTHOGONAL AXES	`limitations[8]`	0.9	the tagger's words
limitations	within an isofrequency slice, position carried no information about CF at all Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the tonotopy claim at the scale a user would apply it: within an isofrequency slice, position carries no information about CF - THE STANDARDIZED SON WAS SLICED INTO FIVE SECTIONS to test exactly this	`limitations[9]`	1.0	the tagger's words
transfers	retinotopy as the template for what a sensory map is and why it matters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`transfers[0]`	0.85	the tagger's words
controls	each stimulus presented twenty times in a pseudo-randomised sequence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: adaptation and order - a fixed sequence would confound the tonotopic response with position in the run · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held	`controls[0]`	0.85	the tagger's words
concepts	characteristic frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: characteristic frequency	`concepts[3]`	0.85	the paper's words
concepts	Q10 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Q10	`concepts[4]`	0.85	the paper's words
concepts	response threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response threshold	`concepts[5]`	0.85	the paper's words
senses	tonotopy is treated here as a MATTER OF DEGREE with a measured precision, not as present or absent - the paper's second conclusion is that this map is less precise than others in the same species Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[0]`	1.0	the tagger's words
senses	the map is operationalised as a multiple regression of characteristic frequency on normalised 3D position, reported as r-squared - the same operationalisation Muniak2014 used for mouse DCN Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[1]`	1.0	the tagger's words
senses	characteristic frequency is defined as the frequency with the lowest response threshold, and threshold itself as two SDs above spontaneous rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[2]`	1.0	the tagger's words
senses	onset versus sustained are response patterns classified from post-stimulus histograms at 20 dB above threshold, and the paper finds they are spatially interspersed rather than segregated Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`senses[3]`	1.0	the tagger's words
alternatives	method: in vivo single- and multi-unit recording with electrolytic lesion marking, 3D Nissl reconstruction, normalisation to a standardised nucleus, then PCA and multiple regression of CF on position Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: electrophysiology — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.	`alternatives.method`		the tagger's words
alternatives	phenomenon: tonotopy in an inhibitory long-range projection nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: tonotopic organization of an inhibitory auditory brainstem nucleus — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides.	`alternatives.phenomenon`		the tagger's words
claim_relations	replicates → Coleman et al., 2011 (previous characterization of the chicken SON) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[0]`		the tagger's words
claim_relations	builds-on → Moiseff and Konishi, 1983; Lachica et al., 1994; Tabor et al., 2011 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[1]`		the tagger's words
claim_relations	extends → Rubel and Parks, 1975 (tonotopy of other chicken brainstem auditory nuclei) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[2]`		the tagger's words
claim_relations	extends → the tonotopic organisation established for excitatory nuclei of the chicken auditory brainstem Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[3]`	1.0	the tagger's words
claim_relations	confirms → earlier suggestions from owl and chicken that frequency is systematically represented in the SON Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[4]`	0.9	the tagger's words
claim_relations	supports → the group's own earlier characterisation of SON response types and their proportions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[5]`	1.0	the tagger's words
claim_relations	contradicts → the expectation that physiologically distinct SON cell types occupy distinct territories Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`claim_relations[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
concept_edges	characteristic frequency —operationalised-as→ response threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: CF is DEFINED through threshold, and threshold is itself defined as two SDs above spontaneous rate - a two-step operational chain also in: characteristic frequency · response threshold	`concept_edges[1]`	1.0	the tagger's words
concept_edges	onset —contrasted-with→ sustained Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: and they are spatially interspersed rather than segregated, which is the paper's third conclusion also in: onset · sustained	`concept_edges[2]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	regression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: regression	`content_tags.statistics[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis	`content_tags.statistics[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	eigen-decomposition of the covariance matrix Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: eigen-decomposition of the covariance matrix	`content_tags.statistics[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test	`content_tags.statistics[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	coefficient of determination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coefficient of determination	`content_tags.statistics[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	standard deviation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard deviation	`content_tags.statistics[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	multiple regression analysis of CF on 3D position Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: multiple regression analysis of CF on 3D position	`content_tags.statistics[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	principal component analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: principal component analysis	`content_tags.statistics[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	coefficient of determination Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: coefficient of determination	`content_tags.statistics[8]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	error magnitude between predicted and measured CF Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: error magnitude between predicted and measured CF	`content_tags.statistics[9]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	In most reconstructed nuclei characteristic frequency ran along the dorsal-ventral axis, low frequencies dorsally and high frequencies ventrally. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	A linear rather than logarithmic function best described the frequency map in the large majority of individual cases. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	The first principal component of the combined dataset accounted for 72% of the variance. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Large prediction errors and a low r2 suggest the SON frequency map is less precise than the tonotopy of other auditory brainstem nuclei in the same species. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Within isofrequency slices the residual scatter in CF was not related to medial-lateral or anterior-posterior position, so the imprecision is not confined to a particular subregion. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Neurons with onset and with sustained response patterns are intermingled throughout the nucleus rather than occupying separate territories. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Each of the two response types forms a complete tonotopic map, and the two maps are arranged similarly. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[6]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Sustained responders were more sharply tuned than onset responders. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[7]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	characteristic frequency runs linearly from low dorsally to high ventrally in the SON Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[8]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	a linear relation fitted 15 of 19 individual nuclei, a log relation two, and two showed none Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[9]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	in the best individual case, 85% of CF variation was accounted for by position Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[10]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	across the standardised nucleus the fit was significant but not strong, r-squared 0.62 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[11]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	the first principal component accounted for 72% of the variance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[12]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	the map is less precise than the tonotopy of other auditory brainstem nuclei in the same species Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[13]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	within isofrequency slices, position carried no information about CF Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[14]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	onset and sustained responders both show a dorsal-low to ventral-high tonotopic organisation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[15]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	73% of isolated neurons were sustained, 25% onset and 2% suppressed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[16]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	sustained responders are more frequency-selective than onset responders Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.findings[17]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	characteristic frequency (CF) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: characteristic frequency (CF)	`content_tags.definitions[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	response threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response threshold	`content_tags.definitions[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	center of mass of recording sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: center of mass of recording sites	`content_tags.definitions[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	tonotopic map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tonotopic map	`content_tags.definitions[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	characteristic frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: characteristic frequency	`content_tags.definitions[5]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	response threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response threshold	`content_tags.definitions[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	Q10 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Q10	`content_tags.definitions[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	Q10 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Q10	`content_tags.variables[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	response threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response threshold	`content_tags.variables[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	body temperature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: body temperature	`content_tags.variables[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	characteristic frequency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: characteristic frequency	`content_tags.variables[6]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	normalized distances Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: normalized distances	`content_tags.variables[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	response patterns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response patterns	`content_tags.variables[8]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	normalized medial-lateral coordinate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: normalized medial-lateral coordinate	`content_tags.variables[9]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	normalized dorsal-ventral coordinate axis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: normalized dorsal-ventral coordinate axis	`content_tags.variables[10]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	normalized anterior-posterior coordinate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: normalized anterior-posterior coordinate	`content_tags.variables[11]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	310 multiple-units and 349 isolated neurons; CF 90 to 5,000 Hz — size of the recorded sample and the range of characteristic frequencies encountered Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[0]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	Seventy-three percent — proportion of isolated neurons with sustained (primary-like or pauser-like) responses, against 25% onset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[1]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	72% — variance in the combined location-plus-CF dataset captured by the first principal component Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[2]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	r 2 = 0.62, P < 0.01 — strength of the linear relation between CF and 3D location in the standardized nucleus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[3]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	85% — variation in CF explained by recording location in the best single case Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[4]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	60% — variability in the standardized dataset accounted for by the multilinear regression, taken as the precision of the map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[5]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	CF = 0.01 + 0.32 / + 4.09 v − 0.55 a — the fitted predictive equation giving characteristic frequency in kHz from normalized 3D coordinates Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[6]`		the tagger's words
content_tags	r-squared 0.62 for the standardised nucleus — how much CF variation position accounts for - directly comparable with Muniak2014's 0.87 for mouse DCN, since the operationalisation is the same Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[7]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	85% — the best individual case Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[8]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	72% on the first principal component — how one-dimensional the arrangement is - Muniak2014 reported 75% by the same method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[9]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	310 multiple-units and 349 isolated neurons, CF from 90 to 5,000 Hz — the sample and its frequency span Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[10]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	73% sustained, 25% onset, 2% suppressed — response type proportions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[11]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	12 to 75 sites per animal — sampling density Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[12]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	two SDs above spontaneous rate — the stipulated threshold criterion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[13]`	1.0	the tagger's words
content_tags	two-thirds of peak voltage — the stipulated cut for counting multi-unit events Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above.	`content_tags.quantities[14]`	1.0	the tagger's words

Interpretive choices

Tags that could not be placed in the text:

none — every tag was located in the text

What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.