standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| second reading | alternatives | an independent re-reading of a facet, recorded whether or not it agrees |
| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 4 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | how areas across the entire mouse neocortex organise into communication networks, mapped by over 600 traced pathways Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | how do different cortical areas communicate at the network level across the whole structure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | delivers a cortical connectivity atlas and matrices from uniformly collected tracer data, and finds the neocortex clusters into four somatic sensorimotor, two medial and two lateral subnetworks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | cortico-cortical connectivity of the mouse neocortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | system-or-tool-building Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: system-or-tool-building | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | each injection is designed to return four kinds of information at once - inputs, outputs, reciprocal connections and intermediate stations - by pairing an anterograde with a retrograde tracer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the two tracer directions are used as independent measurements of the same connection, and their agreement is reported as a validity check Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | injection specificity is cross-validated by tracing the reverse direction: retrograde tracer into the regions the anterograde labelling had targeted Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the subnetworks are not stipulated but produced by reordering the matrix with a clustering algorithm, and named afterwards Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the clustering makes the matrix diagonal readable as within-subnetwork density and the off-diagonal as between-subnetwork traffic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the whole analysis rests on hand annotation, because no tool can identify fine anatomic boundaries, and the strengths recorded are semi-quantitative Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | each pathway is rendered as a separate layer in a common anatomic frame so that arbitrary combinations can be viewed together Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | uniform collection and analysis is claimed as the advantage over connectivity matrices assembled from published literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the somatosensory subdivisions used as network nodes are themselves validated against known somatotopy in the brainstem before being used Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[8] | 0.8 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | a visualisation artefact is disclosed rather than left for the reader to discover: the injection sites look larger than they are once the image is brightened enough to show fine fibers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the resource is framed as the input to later causal work, naming the specific techniques that would test any mapped pathway Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Interpreting large-scale connectivity data remains an unsolved challenge. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the interpretive claims, not the resource: the paper demonstrates THE FEASIBILITY OF PRODUCING AND COLLECTING LARGE-SCALE CONNECTIVITY DATA, and names interpretation as the unsolved part | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Published injection-site images overstate the true injection size. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any reading of injection extent from the published figures: WHEN IMAGES ARE ADJUSTED TO REVEAL FINE FIBERS, INJECTION [extent appears larger] than the ~250-500um stated | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Annotation had to be done by hand because no automated tool can delineate fine anatomical boundaries. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the precision of every areal boundary in the atlas: INFORMATICS TOOLS THAT AUTOMATICALLY AND PRECISELY IDENTIFY FINE ANATOMIC BOUNDARIES ... ARE NON-EXISTENT, so annotation is by hand | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The mapped long-range interactions have not been validated at the synaptic or cell-type level. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the synaptic and cell-type reading of any mapped connection: these MAY BE VALIDATED AT THE SYNAPTIC LEVEL USING TRANSSYNAPTIC VIRAL TRACING - not done here | limitations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | interpreting connectivity data at this scale is named as the unsolved part, not the collection of it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[0] - collection is demonstrated, interpretation is not | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | no automated tool exists for the annotation step, so the atlas is hand-made and semi-quantitative Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[2], with the consequence: the analysis is hand-made and semi-quantitative | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the matrices discard route, laminar specificity and topography, which the authors call critical features of networks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: every use of the connectivity matrices: THEY EXCLUDE DETAILS LIKE PROJECTIONS ROUTES, LAMINAR SPECIFICITY OF PROJECTIONS, OR TOPOGRAPHICAL organisation - the condensed view drops features the authors call critical | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the mapped connections are anatomical and require separate validation at the synaptic and functional level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the same scope as limitations[3] - anatomical connections, awaiting synaptic and functional validation | limitations[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | human network findings are held to need validation in animal models at higher resolution, which is the gap this atlas is built to fill Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the transfer of human network findings: IT IS NECESSARY TO VALIDATE THESE NETWORKS USING RELIABLE NEURAL TRACT TRACING METHODS IN ANIMAL MODELS AT A HIGHER RESOLUTION | limitations[8] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the hub - a region of high network interaction - imported to interpret the claustrum and lateral entorhinal area Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | reordering nodes so that dense groups fall along the diagonal, which converts a connectivity table into a set of named subnetworks Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | cross-validating anterograde injection specificity by applying retrograde tracers to the regions targeted by anterogradely labelled axon terminals, and the reverse Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the anterograde labelling reflects nonspecific injection spread rather than a genuine projection · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| senses | connectome - as the C. elegans-style complete synaptic wiring diagram versus as the meso-scale regional map this paper builds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | cortical network - as derived from human fMRI and diffusion imaging versus as traced anatomically in an animal model; the paper treats the second as validation of the first Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | connectivity matrix - assembled piecemeal from published literature versus collected and analysed uniformly; the paper claims the difference matters Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | subnetwork - as a cluster in a reordered matrix versus as an anatomically or functionally defined system; here the first produces the second, and the names come last Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | primary sensory cortex as strictly unisensory versus as cross-modally modulated - a boundary the connectivity data is said to challenge Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | connection strength - as a semi-quantitative hand-graded density, which is what the weights in every matrix here actually are Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| alternatives | claim_type: method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: existence — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.claim_type | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | method: double co-injection tract tracing, one anterograde and one retrograde tracer per site, across the whole neocortex, hand-annotated into weighted directional matrices and clustered Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: system-or-tool-building — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.method | the tagger's words | |
| alternatives | phenomenon: large-scale cortico-cortical network organisation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value. Recorded: cortico-cortical connectivity of the mouse neocortex — note: a second reading, verbatim-verified, disagreeing with the value on the record. Not applied - a person decides. | alternatives.phenomenon | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the double co-injection tract tracing method of Thompson and Swanson (2010) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → cortical connectivity matrices previously assembled from literature data (Honey et al., 2007; Sporns et al., 2007; Markov et al., 2010) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the concept of cross-modal modulation (Driver and Noesselt, 2008; Stein and Stanford, 2008) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → the account of the lateral entorhinal cortex as a gateway to the hippocampus (de Curtis and Paré, 2004) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the experimental procedures of Hintiryan et al. (2012) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | critiques → cortical connectivity matrices assembled piecemeal from the published literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: THE AXIS IS HOW THE DATA WERE ASSEMBLED. 'the networks reported here are based on data collected and analyzed in a homogenous fashion rather than gathered piecemeal from the literature.' A critique of provenance rather than of any result - and one this project should read against itself, since a cross-field corpus is assembled exactly the way this sentence criticises. | claim_relations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → human structural and functional network studies using fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging, which the paper holds need animal validation at higher resolution Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the assumption that mammalian primary sensory cortices are strictly unisensory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the network-science framing of brain organisation, including the hub concept Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → wiring diagrams previously assembled only for specific functional systems or smaller scales Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | subnetworks —operationalised-as→ clustering algorithm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but subnetworks were revealed by a clustering algorithm; operationalised-as is loose. also in: subnetworks · clustering algorithm | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | claustrum —is-a→ hubs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.8
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span notes the claustrum's broad intracortical connections; is-a 'hubs' is inferred. | concept_edges[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | medial —distinct-from→ lateral Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 | concept_edges[5] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | lateral entorhinal area —part-of→ trisynaptic circuit Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'ENTl'; the endpoint is a variant, and part-of is loose ('the starting point of' the circuit). also in: lateral entorhinal area · trisynaptic circuit | concept_edges[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cluster analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cluster analysis | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | percentage agreement between two methods Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | weighted directional connectivity matrices Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[2] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clustering algorithm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clustering algorithm | content_tags.statistics[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | semi-quantitative densities Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: semi-quantitative densities | content_tags.statistics[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | The mouse neocortex resolves into eight subnetworks: four somatic sensorimotor, two medial and two lateral, each with its own topology, communicating through selected cortical areas. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Anterograde and retrograde tracing agreed on 89% of matrix entries, cross-validating the connectivity dataset. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The claustrum's cortical connectivity is asymmetric: it receives bilateral cortical input but sends output almost exclusively to the same hemisphere. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The temporal association, ectorhinal and perirhinal areas are back-labelled from layers 2 and 5a of the entire neocortex except ACAv, RSP and VISp. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Because every main node of the four somatic sensorimotor subnetworks is reciprocally connected, sensory and motor areas can interact directly without routing through higher-order association cortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The findings support cross-modal modulation, challenging the idea that mammalian primary sensory cortices are strictly unisensory. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The second medial subnetwork is a serial chain running from dorsal subiculum to RSPv to ACAv and then to the infralimbic, prelimbic and medial orbitofrontal areas. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Ventral retrosplenial cortex is the sole neocortical area receiving dense dorsal subicular input, making it the entry point for dorsal hippocampal information into neocortex. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is where all four somatic sensorimotor subnetworks converge. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The ventromedial prefrontal cortex is where the medial and lateral subnetworks converge, letting external sensory and internal visceral/gustatory information be integrated. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 89% of connections were labelled by both the anterograde and retrograde methods, so the two datasets largely agree Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clustering placed every node into a small number of distinct cortico-cortical modules Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the four somatic sensorimotor modules each formed a separate subnetwork Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the claustrum and lateral entorhinal area have broad unique connections consistent with a hub role Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | claustral connectivity is asymmetric: inputs bilateral, outputs almost exclusively ipsilateral Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the temporal subnetwork receives input from nearly the entire neocortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | within the somatic sensorimotor subnetworks, sensory and motor areas interact directly without higher-order association areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[16] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the lateral subnetworks are points of massive convergence, each connected to a large number of cortical areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[17] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | each subnetwork converges onto a discrete territory of prefrontal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[18] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the prefrontal zones are relatively segregated, which may help define their unique processing roles Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[19] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about 600 pathways from around 317 co-injections are available, 304 efferent and 296 afferent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[20] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the findings support cross-modal modulation, against strictly unisensory primary sensory cortices Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[21] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | macro- or meso-connectome Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: macro- or meso-connectome | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | hub Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: hub | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | iConnectome Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: iConnectome | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | meso-connectome Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: meso-connectome | content_tags.definitions[5] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | double co-injection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: double co-injection | content_tags.definitions[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | hubs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: hubs | content_tags.definitions[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | clustering Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clustering | content_tags.definitions[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | intraconnectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: intraconnectivity | content_tags.definitions[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | interconnectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interconnectivity | content_tags.definitions[10] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | injection site Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: injection site | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | density of intraconnectivity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: density of intraconnectivity | content_tags.variables[4] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | laminar distribution patterns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: laminar distribution patterns | content_tags.variables[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | anterograde and retrograde labeling Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: anterograde and retrograde labeling | content_tags.variables[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Over 600 — labelled neuronal pathways collected across the whole mouse neocortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 240 — intracortical connections manually reconstructed into the common atlas frame Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 89% — share of matrix entries labelled by both the anterograde and the retrograde method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~600 pathways (304 efferent and 296 afferent), ~317 co-injections — contents of the released dataset at time of publication Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 80 anterograde and 160 retrograde — pathways included in the reconstructed cortico-cortical connectivity map Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ~ 250-500μm — diameter of the tracer co-injection sites Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 50μm — section thickness used for all brains Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | over 600 labeled neuronal pathways — the atlas contents Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 240 — intracortical connections manually reconstructed into the common frame Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 89% — connections labelled by both tracer directions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ~250-500μm — co-injection size, mostly confined within individual cortical areas Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 304 efferent and 296 afferent — pathway counts from about 317 co-injections Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 8 week old male C57Bl/6J mice — the animals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.