(cid:NN). The PDF this text was extracted from encodes 3 characters in a way that names no letter, so the extractor could not say what they were. The quotes keep them because a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing — the marks are the source’s, not the tagging’s.standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no mechanisms. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | the depletion effect in self-control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| limitations | Time spent reading was used as the main self-control measure, which the authors acknowledge need not indicate careful processing; they added a recall measure in response. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the self-control measure: SPENDING MORE TIME ON READING MIGHT NOT IMPLY BETTER SELF-CONTROL IF PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT CAREFULLY PROCESSING THE MESSAGE | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The supporting recall analyses for experiment 2 are asserted rather than reported, so they cannot be evaluated from the article itself. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the experiment 2 recall support: DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS, THESE DATA ARE NOT REPORTED IN DETAIL HERE | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| transfers | the health-risk literature's account of how messages at different levels of construal are processed, carried into consumer research on self-regulatory depletion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | risk estimation measured in the same participants both before and after the construal-level manipulation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: between-person differences in baseline risk perception, which a post-only comparison would leave inside the effect · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the moderating effect of construal level on depletion replicated in a further experiment using the standard tasks of the literature - the paper states the result and marks the study 'not reported in this article' Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the effect depending on the particular tasks these authors chose - the replication uses the tasks the field already uses, and its outcome is asserted without being shown · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | depletion effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: depletion effect | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | construal level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: construal level | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | self-control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: self-control | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | resource accessibility cues Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: resource accessibility cues | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | A MODERATOR THAT REVERSES THE SIGN RATHER THAN WEAKENING IT: `Quotation withheld.` Not attenuation - inversion. So `depletion reduces self-control` is true at one level of a moderator and false at the other, and an edge carrying `effect_direction: reduces` would be wrong for half of this paper's own design. Fourth record today where the axis vocabulary has no single sign to record Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | DEPLETION WORKS THROUGH A SELF-ASSESSMENT, NOT THROUGH A RESOURCE: `Quotation withheld. Hence, they exert less self-control only when they assess themselves as depleted.` The person reads their own tiredness as evidence about how much control they have left, and acts on the reading. That makes the depletion effect a judgement about oneself rather than a fact about oneself - and it predicts that anything which changes what you consult will change the effect, which is exactly what the construal manipulation does Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE CONTROL THAT TURNS THAT FROM AN INTERPRETATION INTO A RESULT: `Quotation withheld.` The resource state is held constant and the effect still disappears. Same tiredness, different use of it. That is the sentence that locates the phenomenon in what the person consults rather than in what they have, and without it the construal result would be compatible with high-level construal simply making people less tired Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | TWO CONSTRUAL LEVELS, TWO DIFFERENT MEDIATORS, ONE DESIGN: `A focus on resource limitations, specifically feelings of tiredness, MEDIATED the effect ... for individuals at LOWER construal levels`, while `At higher construal levels, individuals' perceptions of the benefits to goals attained by performing the second task mediated the treatment effects.` The moderator does not turn one mechanism up and down - it swaps which mechanism is running. A record that stored only `construal level moderates depletion` would lose the fact that the two arms are not the same process at different strengths Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Fujita et al. (2006), who called for integrating construal level theory with ego-depletion models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Fujita et al. (2006) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → Fujita et al. (2006) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | resource accessibility cues —causes→ self-control Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE DIRECTION IS CONDITIONAL AND THE CONDITION IS IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS: 'At low-level construals'. Reading a tiredness cue lowers self-control only for people construing concretely; at high construal the same tiredness does nothing, which the third sense quotes. Weight 0.85 for that reason - the edge is true inside one arm of the design and the arm is named in the quote. also in: resource accessibility cues · self-control | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | exerting self-control on a prior task reduces self-control on a later task (the depletion effect) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | high-level construal reduces the resource focus and can even reverse the depletion effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | depleted participants showed poorer self-control than non-depleted participants Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | construal level Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: construal level | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | depletion effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: depletion effect | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | p-value Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: p-value | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.