standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 12 of 12 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | how COVID-19 information spread on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit and Gab over the same 45 days, and whether content from questionable outlets travels differently from content from reliable ones Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | whether the diffusion of misinformation is a property of the content or of the platform it is on Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a five-platform comparison over one keyword set, with an epidemic model fitted per platform, showing that reliable and questionable content share a growth pattern whose ratio depends entirely on the platform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | an infodemic - and a quantity whose value is a property of the environment measured rather than of the thing measured Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | observational-study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: observational-study | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | posts and reactions from questionable outlets grow at the same pace as those from reliable ones inside a platform, so the questionable series is a re-scaling of the reliable one. THE ONLY THING THAT VARIES IS THE SCALING FACTOR, AND IT VARIES BY PLATFORM - which means a single-platform study measures its platform, not the phenomenon Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | Gab posts about 70% as much questionable as reliable content and reacts to it about three times more. Counting posts and counting reactions therefore rank the platforms differently, and the amplification factor exists precisely to separate them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: volume and reaction come apart | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | reliability comes from Media Bias/Fact Check at the level of the news outlet. Every article from a listed outlet inherits its label, and every article from an unlisted one is invisible. The paper states the limit and prints the six criteria rather than citing the list, which is what makes the boundary checkable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | every platform's data was gathered by the same Google-Trends-derived keyword list, and on Gab the hashtags were then manually browsed and selected by meaning. What is in the dataset is what those keywords caught, and the comparability across five platforms rests on the list being applied identically Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: the keyword set is the aperture | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | R0 is the number of secondary cases an infectious individual creates. Here the infection is posting about COVID-19, so R0 > 1 means the topic keeps spreading. The metaphor imports a threshold at 1 that the social process did not have Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | reliability is labelled at the level of the news outlet rather than the single article, and the authors name this as the limit of the approach Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the definition of `fake news` may be `inadequate, since political debate often resorts to labelling opposite news as unreliable or fake` Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Twitter data before 27 January could not be gathered because of API limitations, so that platform's series starts later than the others Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Gab has no official API guide, so hashtags were manually browsed and selected by meaning rather than by a documented procedure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the whole dataset is bounded by a keyword list derived from Google Trends Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | the basic reproduction number from epidemiology, applied to users who begin posting about a topic rather than to infected individuals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| transfers | a third-party fact-checking organisation's outlet ratings, used as the ground truth for content reliability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | five platforms analysed over the same time window with the same keyword set, rather than one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a platform-specific effect being reported as a property of misinformation - which the paper names as the flaw in single-platform studies · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the growth of reliable-source content plotted against questionable-source content within each platform, rather than questionable content alone Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a rise in misinformation that is really a rise in posting - the two grow at the same pace, so the ratio is the only thing that carries information · outcome: held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the amplification factor defined and measured separately from post volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: posting and reacting being conflated - on Gab they point in opposite directions · outcome: held | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the six criteria for a questionable source printed in the paper rather than cited to the fact-checking organisation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a category readers cannot inspect - the boundary is stated even though the labels come from a third party · outcome: held | controls[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | keyword-driven collection applied identically across platforms, with the Gab hashtags manually browsed because no documented API guide exists Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a cross-platform difference that is really a difference in how each platform was searched · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | questionable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: questionable | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | reliable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reliable | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | news outlets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: news outlets | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | single articles Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: single articles | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | platform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: platform | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Gab Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Gab | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: volume | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | reactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: reactions | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | amplification factor Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: amplification factor | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | fake news Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: fake news | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | keywords Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: keywords | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | post Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: post | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | diffusion of information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: diffusion of information | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | massive data analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: massive data analysis | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Twitter Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Twitter | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Instagram Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Instagram | concepts[15] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | YouTube Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: YouTube | concepts[16] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Reddit Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Reddit | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | engagement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: engagement | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interest Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interest | concepts[19] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | epidemic models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: epidemic models | concepts[20] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | basic reproduction number R0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: basic reproduction number R0 | concepts[21] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | misinformation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: misinformation | concepts[22] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | spreading patterns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spreading patterns | concepts[23] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | rumors’ amplification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rumors’ amplification | concepts[24] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreak Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: SARS-CoV-2 virus outbreak | concepts[25] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | global threat Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: global threat | concepts[26] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | disintermediated news cycle Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: disintermediated news cycle | concepts[27] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | infodemic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: infodemic | concepts[28] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | misinformation phenomena Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: misinformation phenomena | concepts[29] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | social response Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social response | concepts[30] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | information is consumed and reported Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: information is consumed and reported | concepts[31] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | behavioral response of the population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[32] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | public health interventions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: public health interventions | concepts[33] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | communication dynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: communication dynamics | concepts[34] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | users’ preferences and attitudes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: users’ preferences and attitudes | concepts[35] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | algorithms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: algorithms | concepts[36] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | content promotion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: content promotion | concepts[37] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | social perceptions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social perceptions | concepts[38] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | framing of narratives Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: framing of narratives | concepts[39] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | policy-making Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: policy-making | concepts[40] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | polarized groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: polarized groups | concepts[41] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | shared narratives Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: shared narratives | concepts[42] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | comparative analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: comparative analysis | concepts[43] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | five social media platforms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: five social media platforms | concepts[44] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 8 million comments and posts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 8 million comments and posts | concepts[45] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 45 days Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 45 days | concepts[46] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | secondary cases Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: secondary cases | concepts[47] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | “infectious” individual Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: “infectious” individual | concepts[48] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | R0 = 1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: R0 = 1 | concepts[49] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | mainstream platforms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mainstream platforms | concepts[50] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | less regulated social media platforms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[51] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | crowdfunded social media Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: crowdfunded social media | concepts[52] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | social news aggregation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social news aggregation | concepts[53] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | collective filtering of information Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: collective filtering of information | concepts[54] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Google Trends’ COVID-19 related queries Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[55] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 1,342,103 posts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 1,342,103 posts | concepts[56] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 7,465,721 comments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 7,465,721 comments | concepts[57] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | 3,734,815 users Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: 3,734,815 users | concepts[58] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interactions | concepts[59] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | users’ activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: users’ activity | concepts[60] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | long tail Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: long tail | concepts[61] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | dynamics of reactions and content consumption Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[62] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Natural Language Processing techniques Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[63] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | word embedding Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: word embedding | concepts[64] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | word vector representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: word vector representation | concepts[65] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | clustering procedures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: clustering procedures | concepts[66] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cumulative number of new posts each day Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[67] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | first situation report Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: first situation report | concepts[68] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | specific timings for content consumption Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[69] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interaction mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interaction mechanisms | concepts[70] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | standard epidemic models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: standard epidemic models | concepts[71] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | monotonic increasing trend Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: monotonic increasing trend | concepts[72] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | growth mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: growth mechanisms | concepts[73] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | phenomenological models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: phenomenological models | concepts[74] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | basic reproduction number R0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: basic reproduction number R0 | concepts[75] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | infective process Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: infective process | concepts[76] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | EXP model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: EXP model | concepts[77] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | SIR (Susceptible, Infected, Recovered) compartmental model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[78] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | supercritical Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: supercritical | concepts[79] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | engagement rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: engagement rate | concepts[80] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | social contagion phenomena Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: social contagion phenomena | concepts[81] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | abrupt jump Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: abrupt jump | concepts[82] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | continuous models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: continuous models | concepts[83] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Media Bias/Fact Check Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Media Bias/Fact Check | concepts[84] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | extreme bias Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: extreme bias | concepts[85] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | propaganda/conspiracies Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: propaganda/conspiracies | concepts[86] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | poor or no sourcing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: poor or no sourcing | concepts[87] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | lack of transparency Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lack of transparency | concepts[88] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | overall reactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: overall reactions | concepts[89] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | strong linear correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: strong linear correlation | concepts[90] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | growth dynamics Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: growth dynamics | concepts[91] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | re-scaled version Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: re-scaled version | concepts[92] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | re-scaling factor ρ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: re-scaling factor ρ | concepts[93] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | mainstream social media Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mainstream social media | concepts[94] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | coefficient of relative amplification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[95] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | permeability of a platform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: permeability of a platform | concepts[96] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Twitter is the most neutral Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Twitter is the most neutral | concepts[97] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | YouTube amplifies questionable sources less Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[98] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Reddit reduces the impact of questionable sources Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[99] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Gab strongly amplifies them Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Gab strongly amplifies them | concepts[100] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interaction paradigm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interaction paradigm | concepts[101] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interaction patterns of groups of users Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[102] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | tailored communication strategies Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tailored communication strategies | concepts[103] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Reddit dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Reddit dataset | concepts[104] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | YouTube Data API Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: YouTube Data API | concepts[105] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Twitter API Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Twitter API | concepts[106] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stream API Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stream API | concepts[107] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | search API Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: search API | concepts[108] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Instagram Dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Instagram Dataset | concepts[109] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | URLs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: URLs | concepts[110] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | MediaBias/FactCheck (MBFC) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: MediaBias/FactCheck (MBFC) | concepts[111] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Factual/Sourcing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Factual/Sourcing | concepts[112] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Conspiracy-Pseudoscience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Conspiracy-Pseudoscience | concepts[113] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Pro-Science Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Pro-Science | concepts[114] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | binary label Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: binary label | concepts[115] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | matching ability Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: matching ability | concepts[116] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) algorithm Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[117] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Skip-gram model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Skip-gram model | concepts[118] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | distributed representations of words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: distributed representations of words | concepts[119] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) | concepts[120] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) | concepts[121] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | linear regularities among words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: linear regularities among words | concepts[122] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | English Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: English | concepts[123] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | HTML code, URLs and email addresses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: HTML code, URLs and email addresses | concepts[124] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | stop-words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: stop-words | concepts[125] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cosine distance matrix Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cosine distance matrix | concepts[126] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | average silhouette width Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: average silhouette width | concepts[127] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | average pairwise Jaccard similarity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: average pairwise Jaccard similarity | concepts[128] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | word clouds Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: word clouds | concepts[129] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | mechanistic models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mechanistic models | concepts[130] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | adjusted exponential model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: adjusted exponential model | concepts[131] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | data-scarce settings Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: data-scarce settings | concepts[132] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | classical SIR model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: classical SIR model | concepts[133] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | susceptible population Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: susceptible population | concepts[134] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | infected individuals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: infected individuals | concepts[135] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | rate β Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rate β | concepts[136] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | γ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: γ | concepts[137] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | linear regression coefficients Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: linear regression coefficients | concepts[138] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | R2 values Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: R2 values | concepts[139] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | average number of secondary cases Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: average number of secondary cases | concepts[140] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Word embeddings Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Word embeddings | concepts[141] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | EXP Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: EXP | concepts[142] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | E U /E R Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: E U /E R | concepts[143] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | interaction paradigm imposed by the specific social media Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[144] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | information spreading Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: information spreading | concepts[145] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | perils of misinformation phenomena Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perils of misinformation phenomena | concepts[146] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: dataset | concepts[147] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | R0 > 1 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: R0 > 1 | concepts[148] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | R0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: R0 | concepts[149] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | audience and interaction mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: audience and interaction mechanisms | concepts[150] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Questionable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Questionable | concepts[151] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cluster words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cluster words | concepts[152] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | linear relationship between reliable and questionable sources Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[153] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| unhoused_relations | adjusted exponential model → EXP Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. The paper indicates the adjusted exponential model as EXP; the gate's same-as cues do not include this wording, so the alias remains unhoused. | unhoused_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | algorithms → content promotion Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Algorithms mediate content promotion; mediates is absent from the eight governed types. | unhoused_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Google Trends’ COVID-19 related queries → dataset Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. The query set filters which platform content enters the dataset; selects-or-filters-into is absent from the governed types. | unhoused_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | R0 > 1 → infodemic Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. R0 above one indicates the possibility of an infodemic; indicator-of is absent from the eight governed types. | unhoused_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | R0 → engagement rate Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. R0 is used as a proxy for engagement rate; proxy-for is absent from the eight governed types. | unhoused_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | specific timings for content consumption → audience and interaction mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Platform timing patterns may depend on audience and social/algorithmic interaction mechanisms; depends-on is absent and the statement is hedged. | unhoused_relations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | growth dynamics → re-scaling factor ρ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. Questionable-source growth is a rescaled version of reliable-source growth, with rho providing the platform-dependent scale; scaled-by is absent. | unhoused_relations[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Conspiracy-Pseudoscience → Questionable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. MBFC outlets in Conspiracy-Pseudoscience are assigned the binary Questionable label; labelled-as by a classifier is absent from the governed types. | unhoused_relations[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) algorithm → cluster words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. PAM is used to cluster words from their embedding vectors; used-for is absent from the governed types. | unhoused_relations[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| unhoused_relations | R2 values → linear relationship between reliable and questionable sources Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. High R-squared values confirm the linear source-class diffusion relationship; supports-or-confirms is absent from the eight types. | unhoused_relations[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a questionable source - AS DEFINED HERE: a news OUTLET systematically showing extreme bias, promotion of propaganda or conspiracies, poor sourcing, unverifiable information, a lack of transparency, or fake news Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | a questionable source - WHAT THE LABEL CANNOT SEE: the individual article. The authors name labelling outlets rather than single articles as the limit of the approach, in the sentence that adopts it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | `fake news` - AS A TERM: possibly `inadequate, since political debate often resorts to labelling opposite news as unreliable or fake` Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the spread of misinformation - AS A PATTERN: the same growth dynamics as reliable content, re-scaled Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the spread of misinformation - AS A VOLUME: a ratio strongly dependent on the platform, with Gab's reactions running three times the reliable volume Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | R0 - AS AN EPIDEMIC PARAMETER: the average number of secondary cases one infectious individual creates, with 1 as the threshold Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Infodemic - misinformation during outbreak management can fragment social response and interfere with disease countermeasures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Cross-platform unit of comparison - the same COVID-19 argument is observed in environments with different audiences and interaction settings Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Engagement distribution - all five platforms show long-tailed user activity even though their interaction volumes differ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Epidemic analogy - exposure precedes first posting, an already-posting user is infectious, and R0 above one denotes possible infodemic growth Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Model limitation - Instagram's abrupt growth jump drives an implausibly large SIR R0 and cannot be represented by a continuous epidemic model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Source-class growth - questionable and reliable content share a linear growth pace within a platform but differ by a platform-specific rescaling factor Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Volume versus amplification - Gab has lower questionable posting volume than reliable volume while questionable reactions are several times larger Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Relative amplification - alpha above one favors questionable sources, below one favors reliable sources, and near one is neutral Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Outlet-label aperture - only posts with external URLs matching the MBFC list can receive the study's Questionable or Reliable classification Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Phenomenological versus mechanistic modeling - one reproduces empirical curves without a growth mechanism while the other tries to encode the mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[15] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → single-platform studies of misinformation diffusion, on the grounds that the dynamics may be particular to the environment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → the finding that fake news spreads faster and wider than fact-based news, by noting it might be a platform-specific effect Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | qualifies → its own reliability labels, by naming outlet-level rather than article-level tagging as the limit and printing the criteria Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → epidemiological modelling, by fitting a basic reproduction number to the spread of a topic rather than of a disease Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | news outlets —distinct-from→ single articles Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: what unit the reliability judgement is attached to · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): what unit the reliability judgement is attached to · the relation stated: reliability is tagged at the outlet level from a third-party fact-checker; other studies label individual articles, and the authors name the difference as the limit of their approach also in: news outlets · single articles | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | volume —distinct-from→ reactions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: whether the platform's difference is in what is posted or in what is reacted to · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): whether the platform's difference is in what is posted or in what is reacted to · the relation stated: on Gab the volume of questionable posts is about 70% of reliable ones while their reactions are about three times bigger - the volume and the response come apart, and only on that platform
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span compares post volume with reactions; distinct-from is loose. | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | amplification factor —operationalised-as→ post Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.95 · the relation stated: amplification is defined as the average number of reactions a post receives, which separates how much is published from how much is responded to
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but E is the average number of reactions to a post; the endpoint 'post' drops 'reactions'. also in: amplification factor · post | concept_edges[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Gab —is-a→ crowdfunded social media Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper directly classifies Gab as a crowdfunded social medium. also in: Gab · crowdfunded social media | concept_edges[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Reddit —is-a→ social news aggregation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper directly classifies Reddit as social news aggregation. also in: Reddit · social news aggregation | concept_edges[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | R0 —operationalised-as→ average number of secondary cases Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The i.e. clause supplies the study's platform-level operational definition. also in: R0 · average number of secondary cases | concept_edges[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | interactions —operationalised-as→ engagement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The study equates its interaction measure with engagement using i.e. also in: interactions · engagement | concept_edges[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | word embedding —operationalised-as→ word vector representation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper defines the embedding representation with an i.e. clause. also in: word embedding · word vector representation | concept_edges[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | phenomenological models —contrasted-with→ mechanistic models Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: reproducing empirical data without versus incorporating growth mechanisms · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · differs in (stated by the tagger, no quotation): reproducing empirical data without versus incorporating growth mechanisms · note: The methods section explicitly distinguishes the two model families. also in: phenomenological models · mechanistic models | concept_edges[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | Word embeddings —operationalised-as→ distributed representations of words Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: An i.e. clause defines word embeddings as distributed representations. | concept_edges[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | coefficient of relative amplification —operationalised-as→ E U /E R Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The coefficient is explicitly defined as the unreliable-to-reliable amplification ratio. also in: coefficient of relative amplification · E U /E R | concept_edges[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | interaction paradigm imposed by the specific social media —causes→ information spreading Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: The analysis suggests that platform interaction paradigms drive spreading; weight reflects 'suggests'. · the relation stated: information spreading is driven by the interaction paradigm imposed by the specific social media or/and by the specific interaction patterns of groups of users engaged with the topic
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but 'Our analysis suggests' spreading is driven by the interaction paradigm; hedged. | concept_edges[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the growth of questionable-source content is a re-scaled version of reliable-source content, and the re-scaling factor depends strongly on the platform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | information from reliable and questionable sources does not present different spreading patterns Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | on Gab, questionable posts are about 70% of the reliable volume while their reactions are about three times bigger Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | reliability is labelled at the level of the news outlet rather than the single article, which the authors name as the limit of the approach Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the definition of fake news may be inadequate because political debate resorts to labelling opposite news as unreliable Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | information spreading appears driven by the interaction paradigm imposed by the specific platform or by the interaction patterns of the users engaged Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | a news outlet systematically showing one or more of: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda or conspiracies, poor or no sourcing, information not supported by evidence or unverifiable, a complete lack of transparency, or fake news Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: questionable sources | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the average number of reactions to a post - a measure of the extent to which a post is amplified in a social media Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: amplification factor | content_tags.definitions[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | days of data across five platforms, more than 8 million comments and posts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | R0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: R0 | content_tags.statistics[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | platform Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: platform | content_tags.variables[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | amplification factor Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: amplification factor | content_tags.variables[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.