standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 4 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | The neural basis of visual memory, including how repeated stimuli elicit reduced neural responses (repetition suppression). Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | What neural mechanisms support visual memory, and how does repeated experience with a stimulus change neuronal responses? Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | Reviews evidence that neurons in visual cortex respond less to repeated than to novel stimuli (repetition suppression), the neural mechanism underlying repetition priming and implicit memory. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | repetition suppression (neural repetition priming) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | THREE COMMONLY OBSERVED NEURONAL EFFECTS IN MEMORY-DEMANDING TASKS ARE REPETITION SUPPRESSION, ENHANCEMENT, AND DELAY ACTIVITY - repeated experience LEADS TO BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM SUPPRESSION, ENHANCEMENT WORKS IN AN OPPOSITE FASHION for OBJECTS WITH LEARNED BEHAVIORAL RELEVANCE, and delay activity holds information ON-LINE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | and they do not share an anatomy: REPETITION SUPPRESSION APPEARS TO BE AN INTRINSIC PROPERTY OF VISUAL CORTICAL AREAS SUCH AS INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX, whereas ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON FEEDBACK TO TEMPORAL CORTEX FROM PREFRONTAL CORTEX Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the proposed reason suppression happens at all: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS A BY-PRODUCT OF SHARPENING STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX - and STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Only three short-term mechanisms are covered; long-term plasticity and perceptual learning are left out. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Hippocampal and medial temporal lobe memory (events, maps, scenes, episodes) is explicitly outside the scope. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The direct test of whether prefrontal feedback causes the IT match-enhancement effect has not been performed. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | the review declares what it excludes: THE TYPES OF MEMORIES NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE STRUCTURES, INCLUDING MEMORIES OF MORE COMPLEX BEHAVIORAL EVENTS, MAPS, SCENES, EPISODES, ETC., ARE NOT CONSIDERED Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: reading this as an account of memory rather than of STIMULUS MEMORY | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | and that the three are a selection - WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW, and THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the coverage of the review: WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW ... THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | half the cells show none of it - FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: reading 'IT neurons carry the memory signal' as a statement about IT neurons rather than about half of them | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the mechanism that would complete the account is the one not established - THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR SOLVING THE DMS TASK THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the account of how the DMS task is solved: THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT ... NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE | limitations[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | repetition suppression looked for outside the task entirely Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the effect being a product of the animal doing a memory task - REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | the same effect looked for under a drug that destroys the behavior Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the effect depending on successful performance - REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND IN MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE IN THE DMS TASK · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | prefrontal cortex cooled while recording in temporal cortex Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: delay activity in IT being generated there independently - IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial | controls[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a task variant built so that one of the two mechanisms cannot solve it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: an ambiguity the standard task leaves open - IN PRINCIPLE, THE ABBA TASK CANNOT BE SOLVED BY AN ANIMAL RELYING ONLY ON THE SUPPRESSIVE MECHANISM · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| controls | prefrontal cortex cooled while recording in temporal cortex [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from facet_results_clean203.json, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began 'ster et al.' - 'Fuster' cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.] Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: delay activity in IT being generated there independently of prefrontal input · outcome: partial | controls[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | repetition priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition priming | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | visual memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: visual memory | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | THE DIRECTION EVERYONE ASSUMES, REVERSED IN THE SECOND SENTENCE: ATTENTION IS OFTEN THOUGHT OF AS A GATEWAY TO LEARNING AND MEMORY... HOWEVER, THE CONVERSE IS EQUALLY TRUE - MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI... ARE ATTENDED Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the conclusion states it as a derivation: ATTENTION DERIVES, AT LEAST IN PART, FROM THE IMPACT OF MEMORY MECHANISMS ON CORTICAL SENSORY MECHANISMS, WHICH ARE INTRINSICALLY COMPETITIVE IN NATURE. `Attention` names an outcome of a competition rather than a process of its own Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | MEMORY DECIDES THE WINNER: ALL OF THESE MNEMONIC EFFECTS ON NEURONAL RESPONSES BIAS THE COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS THAT TAKE PLACE BETWEEN STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX WHEN THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STIMULUS IN THE VISUAL FIELD - AS A RESULT, MEMORY WILL OFTEN DETERMINE THE WINNER OF THESE COMPETITIONS AND, THUS, WILL DETERMINE WHICH STIMULUS IS ATTENDED Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE TASK DESIGN DECIDES WHICH MECHANISM CAN BE INFERRED, STATED IN 1996: Quotation withheld Twenty-three years before Steinmetz2019 retires go/nogo for the same reason Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | TWO MECHANISMS PULLING AGAINST EACH OTHER, AND AGAINST THE ANIMAL: BECAUSE THE SUPPRESSION MECHANISM BIASED RESPONSES IN FAVOR OF THE NONTARGET STIMULUS (THE ONLY UNIQUE STIMULUS IN THE TRIAL), IT WORKED AGAINST BOTH THE ENHANCEMENT MECHANISM AND, PRESUMABLY, THE ANIMAL'S GOAL IN THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE THREE EFFECTS DO NOT SHARE AN ANATOMY: Quotation withheld - BY CONTRAST, ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON FEEDBACK TO TEMPORAL CORTEX FROM PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND ARE THOUGHT TO BE IMPORTANT FOR WORKING MEMORY Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | SUPPRESSION IS NOT ABOUT THE TASK AT ALL: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA - and in MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE IN THE DMS TASK. The effect survives the removal of the behavior it is supposed to serve Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the proposed reason recasts it as a by-product: REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS A BY-PRODUCT OF SHARPENING STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | SEEING SOMETHING TWICE SHRINKS ITS REPRESENTATION: STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS, OR SMALLER STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and the change may not be temporary: A STUDY BY BROWN AND COLLEAGUES SUGGESTS THAT THESE EFFECTS MAY BE PERMANENT - PRESENTATION OF A SET OF STIMULI ON ONE DAY LEADS TO A REDUCED INCIDENCE OF CELLS ACTIVATED BY THOSE STIMULI ON A SUBSEQUENT DAY Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | HALF THE CELLS SHOW NONE OF IT: FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | A PARTIAL NULL, REPORTED AS ONE: IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld. Not present-or-absent - the signal survived and lost its content Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | THE REVIEW NAMES WHAT IT LEAVES OUT: THE TYPES OF MEMORIES NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIPPOCAMPUS AND MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE STRUCTURES, INCLUDING MEMORIES OF MORE COMPLEX BEHAVIORAL EVENTS, MAPS, SCENES, EPISODES, ETC., ARE NOT CONSIDERED Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | and that its three mechanisms are a choice: WE HAVE CONSIDERED ONLY THREE SHORT-TERM MEMORY MECHANISMS IN THIS BRIEF REVIEW... THESE ARE HARDLY EXHAUSTIVE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | AND THE PART THE ACCOUNT CANNOT SUPPLY IS NAMED: THERE REMAINS ONE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR SOLVING THE DMS TASK THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PROPERTIES OF IT NEURONS DESCRIBED SO FAR IN THIS REVIEW - NAMELY, A MECHANISM FOR MAINTAINING THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the task decomposed before any neuron is discussed: TO SOLVE THE DMS TASK THE MONKEY MUST, IN PRINCIPLE, SOLVE THREE PROBLEMS - DISCRIMINATE AMONG THE DIFFERENT STIMULI, RETAIN THE MEMORY OF THE SAMPLE, AND MAKE A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER THE CURRENT TEST STIMULUS MATCHES Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[15] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | A PARTIAL NULL, REPORTED AS ONE: `IT delay activity was Quotation withheld.` Not present-or-absent - the signal survived and lost its content. A result with no place on a binary outcome axis. [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from facet_results_clean203.json, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began `ster et al.` - `Fuster` cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.] Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[16] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → studies reporting that IT cells hold a sample stimulus in memory through stimulus-selective maintained delay activity (refs 27-33) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Nakamura and Kubota (ref 33) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the view that attention is the gateway to memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: the direction of the dependence - MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI... ARE ATTENDED | claim_relations[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | critiques → the standard delayed matching-to-sample design as evidence for a particular memory mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: which mechanisms the design leaves open - THE STANDARD VERSION OF THE DMS TASK MIGHT BE SOLVED BY A MONKEY RELYING ON EITHER ENHANCEMENT OR SUPPRESSION | claim_relations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Brown and colleagues, that repetition effects may be permanent Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: the paper's own hedge: SUGGESTS THAT THESE EFFECTS MAY BE PERMANENT | claim_relations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | memory —causes→ attention Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: the reversal: MECHANISMS FOR LEARNING AND MEMORY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN THE SELECTION PROCESS THAT DETERMINES WHICH STIMULI OF THE MANY STIMULI IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT ARE ATTENDED
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but the span says attention derives in part from memory mechanisms; causes is loose. | concept_edges[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | repetition suppression —causes→ priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: SAME SENTENCE, SECOND EDGE: 'Repetition suppression ... Quotation withheld.' One hedged review sentence supplies three 'causes' edges on this record ([3], [4] and [5]), and all three inherit its hedge. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: Quotation withheld
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but repetition suppression is thought important for priming; causes states a hypothesis. also in: repetition suppression · priming | concept_edges[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | delay activity —causes→ working memory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: SAME SENTENCE, THIRD EDGE: 'By contrast, enhancement and DELAY ACTIVITY MAY DEPEND ON feedback' - the weakest clause of the three, carrying 'may depend on' rather than a reported result. · strength of the relation: 1 · note: ENHANCEMENT AND DELAY ACTIVITY... ARE THOUGHT TO BE IMPORTANT FOR WORKING MEMORY
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but enhancement and delay activity 'are thought to be important' for working memory; hedged. also in: delay activity · working memory | concept_edges[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | prefrontal —causes→ delay activity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. status: A PARTIAL NULL, AND THE EFFECT IS ON SELECTIVITY RATHER THAN PRESENCE: 'not eliminated ... but it became less selective'. Cooling did not abolish the activity, so prefrontal input is not necessary for delay activity to occur - only for it to carry the stimulus. · strength of the relation: 0.5 — the record marks this weak · note: DIRECTION CORRECTED ON RECOVERY. The unmerged row read 'delay activity -causes-> prefrontal'. The experiment COOLED PREFRONTAL CORTEX and MEASURED IT DELAY ACTIVITY, so the manipulation is prefrontal and the readout is delay activity. The original arrow pointed from the readout to the manipulation. [RECOVERED 2026-08-26 from an internal file, written for the retired id Desimone1996-neural-mechanisms-... and merged into this record; 42 of its 45 quote-bearing tags landed and this one did not, because the quote began 'ster et al.' - 'Fuster' cut in half. The gate refuses a mid-word slice, so it was correctly rejected and then lost.]
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its span and kept, but IT delay activity was reduced but not eliminated during prefrontal cooling; causes is loose. also in: prefrontal · delay activity | concept_edges[10] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | about half — the cells whose responses were UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | MEMORY WILL OFTEN DETERMINE THE WINNER OF THESE COMPETITIONS AND, THUS, WILL DETERMINE WHICH STIMULUS IS ATTENDED Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | IN PRINCIPLE, Quotation withheld Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | REPETITION SUPPRESSION IS ALSO FOUND WHEN STIMULI ARE REPEATED DURING PASSIVE FIXATION AND IN MONKEYS UNDER ANESTHESIA, and in MONKEYS GIVEN SYSTEMIC SCOPOLAMINE, WHICH GREATLY IMPAIRS THEIR BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | STIMULUS REPETITION LEADS TO A SMALLER POPULATIONS OF ACTIVATED CELLS, OR SMALLER STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE CORTEX Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FOR ABOUT HALF THE CELLS, RESPONSES TO THE TEST ITEMS WERE APPARENTLY UNAFFECTED BY ANY MNEMONIC ASPECT OF THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | IT DELAY ACTIVITY WAS Quotation withheld Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | BECAUSE THE SUPPRESSION MECHANISM BIASED RESPONSES IN FAVOR OF THE NONTARGET STIMULUS, IT WORKED AGAINST BOTH THE ENHANCEMENT MECHANISM AND, PRESUMABLY, THE ANIMAL'S GOAL IN THE TASK Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | repetition suppression Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition suppression | content_tags.variables[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | REPEATED EXPERIENCE WITH THE SAME VISUAL STIMULUS LEADS TO BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM SUPPRESSION OF NEURONAL RESPONSES IN SUBPOPULATIONS OF VISUAL NEURONS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: repetition suppression | content_tags.definitions[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | FOUND IN TASKS IN WHICH ANIMALS ARE REQUIRED TO ACTIVELY HOLD SPECIFIC INFORMATION “on-line” FOR SHORT PERIODS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: delay activity | content_tags.definitions[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.