standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| unrecordable relation | unhoused_relations | a relation the paper asserts that this vocabulary cannot express, with the reason |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 5 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | the UniProt Knowledgebase itself - 120 million protein records, of which just over half a million carry annotations a human curator read out of the literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | how to keep a knowledge base current, provenance-tracked and correct while the sequence data entering it grows exponentially Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a two-year update: expanded reference proteomes especially for viruses, new rule-based and association-rule annotation systems, a bibliography layer built from other databases and text mining, and a licence change to CC-BY 4.0 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | the gap between what has been sequenced and what has been read - 120 million entries against half a million with curated annotation, and expert curation reaching 35-50% of the curatable literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | system-or-tool-building Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: system-or-tool-building | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | why one wrong curated record matters far beyond itself: functional data is computationally transferred from Swiss-Prot to sequence-related but less studied proteins in TrEMBL, so a correction upstream stops misleading data being added to orthologues on the strength of an over-predictive signature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: annotation propagation | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the growth problem is not more biology but more of the same: 90% of proteins have over 90% identity because sequencing is driven by very similar strains of the same species Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | the premise of the DAAC predictor - that function depends not only on WHICH domains a protein has but on their arrangement and order, so two proteins with the same domain set can do different things Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: domain architecture | mechanisms[2] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | how a cluster-level GO term is earned: it is assigned only when every annotated member carries it, or when it is a common ancestor of at least one term from each - agreement across the cluster rather than a majority Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: conservative propagation | mechanisms[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | expert biocuration reaches only 35-45% of the curatable literature for a species, 50% for humans - the coverage gap is measured and published rather than left implicit Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | curation is labour intensive and the authors defend it anyway as the most efficient way to get everything out of a paper - which is a statement about what automation has NOT replaced Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | keeping a record current is hard because knowledge of protein function evolves and new techniques produce results that may appear to contradict earlier observations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | MECHANISMS TO IDENTIFY AND HIGHLIGHT CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION IN EXISTING ENTRIES ARE A FUTURE PLAN, NOT A CAPABILITY - a 120-million-record knowledge base with per-claim evidence still cannot systematically surface where its own entries disagree Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | redundancy removal is not applied to viruses at all, because their small genomes carry too many variants - a stated exemption with a stated reason Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | UPCLASS, the classifier applied to 32 million accession-PMID pairs, has a published recall of 0.62 - so roughly a third of the classifications it should make, it does not Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | the categorisation of computationally mapped bibliography by source database is described by the authors as not optimal for all literature, which is why the classifier was brought in Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[6] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | an evidence tag on every individual piece of captured knowledge, naming its source Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a claim in the database being untraceable to where it came from - and it is not restricted to the curated half: automatic annotations carry which system produced them · outcome: held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a CAUTION comment recording that a previously reported activity is an unsafe observation, kept on the entry alongside the annotation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a superseded finding either persisting silently or disappearing without trace - the reader gets the claim, the doubt and the reason together · outcome: held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | redundancy removal that moves ~38% of complete proteomes out of UniProtKB and into UniParc, which retains historical obsolete sequence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: growth in near-identical strains swamping the knowledgebase - WITHOUT losing the sequences, which is the difference between a withdrawal and a deletion · outcome: held | controls[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | assigning a GO term to a UniRef cluster only when EVERY annotated member has it, or when it is a common ancestor of at least one term from each Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: a single member's annotation propagating to a whole cluster - the rule requires unanimity or a shared ancestor, not a majority · outcome: held | controls[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | publishing UPCLASS's precision, recall and F-score before applying it at scale Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the classifier's error rate being invisible to users of the 32 million pairs it classified - PARTIAL, because knowing recall is 0.62 does not tell a user WHICH third is missing · outcome: partial | controls[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | prioritising for curation exactly what computational prediction gets WRONG - proteins a signature would place in an enzyme family but which are non-functional through the loss of specific residues Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: human effort being spent where the automatic systems already succeed, and leaves the curators on the cases where a prediction would be confidently wrong · outcome: held | controls[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | admitting metagenome-assembled genomes only when they show high completeness and low contamination, and removing segmented viruses missing one or more segments Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: partial or contaminated assemblies entering the knowledgebase as if they were whole proteomes · outcome: held | controls[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | re-importing curated data from the domain-specific resources it was contributed to - IMEx, the Complex Portal, GO - rather than duplicating their maintenance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the same fact diverging between UniProt and the specialist database that owns it; each is stored and maintained where it belongs and flows back · outcome: held | controls[7] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | UniProtKB Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UniProtKB | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | annotations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: annotations | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | evidences Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: evidences | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | expert biocuration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: expert biocuration | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | CAUTION Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CAUTION | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | UniParc Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UniParc | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | redundancy removal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: redundancy removal | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | InterPro Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: InterPro | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | GO annotation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GO annotation | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | UPCLASS Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UPCLASS | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | UniFire Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UniFire | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | curatable literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: curatable literature | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | METTL14 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: METTL14 | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | METTL3 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: METTL3 | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | MAGs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: MAGs | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| unhoused_relations | CAUTION → METTL14 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. A RECORD HOLDING A CLAIM AND A DOUBT ABOUT THAT CLAIM AT ONCE. The entry keeps the reported methyltransferase activity AND a comment saying the report is an unsafe observation. There is no edge type for 'this annotation is flagged as unreliable' - all eight assert that a relation holds, and the whole content of a CAUTION is that something asserted elsewhere should not be relied on. This is the project's quine1951 finding with a WORKING IMPLEMENTATION on the other side: UniProt can write it and we cannot | unhoused_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| unhoused_relations | expert biocuration → curatable literature Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. A COVERAGE RATIO, WHICH IS A RELATION BETWEEN AN ACTIVITY AND WHAT IT HAS NOT REACHED. Curation captures 35-45% of the curatable literature per species, 50% for humans. 'part-of' is wrong, 'causes' is wrong, and there is no type for 'X covers this fraction of Y' - which is the single most useful thing a knowledge base can say about itself and the thing our own corpus has never stated about its own coverage | unhoused_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| senses | reviewed versus unreviewed - NOT A QUALITY GRADE BUT A PROVENANCE CLASS, and the two are wildly different sizes. `Reviewed` means a curator assimilated multiple lines of evidence from a paper's text and figures; `unreviewed` means a rule fired. Half a million against 120 million. A user filtering to `reviewed` is not filtering out errors, they are filtering to the fraction a person has read Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | evidence, in UniProt - A SOURCE TAG ON EVERY INDIVIDUAL CLAIM, not a citation on the record. Each piece of knowledge carries where it came from, and automatic annotations carry which system produced them. This is the same commitment this corpus makes with its `evidence` field, made by a database three orders of magnitude larger Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | CAUTION - A COMMENT TYPE THAT SAYS A PUBLISHED FINDING IS UNSAFE. When structural work showed METTL14 has a degenerate active site, the earlier reported methyltransferase activity was not deleted and not silently overwritten: a CAUTION comment was added to tell users the initial report is `an unsafe observation`. THE RECORD CARRIES BOTH THE CLAIM AND THE DOUBT Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | removed, of a proteome - MOVED TO AN ARCHIVE, NOT DELETED. Redundancy removal has taken about 38% of complete proteomes out of UniProtKB and placed their sequences in UniParc, which holds a complete set of known sequences including historical obsolete ones. A withdrawal convention at the scale of 241 million proteins Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | prediction precision, of the UniRef GO propagation - MEASURED AGAINST ITS OWN EARLIER OUTPUT. The >97% figure comes from comparing sequences that newly acquired a GO annotation with ones the same system annotated in previous releases. That is self-consistency across releases, which is worth knowing and is not external validation against experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| senses | curatable literature - THE DENOMINATOR THEY MEASURE THEMSELVES AGAINST, and it is not the literature. Coverage of 35-45%, rising to 50% for humans, is a share of the papers judged curatable for a species, so a paper outside that judgement is not counted as missed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the initial characterisation of METTL14 as a methyltransferase, based on reported activity and MT-A70 family membership Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. note: 'contradicts' is right here and it was not for cruz-jentoft2018's mass criterion. The paper does not demote the earlier claim, it reports that structural work showed the active site is degenerate and cannot accommodate the substrates - the earlier finding is not narrowed, it is wrong, and UniProt flags it as unsafe rather than deleting it | claim_relations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | extends → the UniProt Consortium's own previous database update, published in the same journal in 2017 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → InterPro and its member databases PROSITE, SMART and Pfam, whose predictive signatures classify sequences and predict domains for the unreviewed records Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | predicts → the authors of future papers, who are asked to write protein mentions as (UniProtKB: P68369) so curators and text-mining tools can connect their work Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. note: an instruction to a literature that does not exist yet, and the paper defers to any journal that already has its own format - a standard proposed with its own exception attached | claim_relations[3] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → the specialist resources this data is contributed to and re-imported from - the IMEx Consortium, the Complex Portal and the Gene Ontology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | annotations —part-of→ UniProtKB Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: annotations · UniProtKB | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | evidences —part-of→ annotations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: RETYPED IN THE AUDIT from 'annotations --operationalised-as--> evidences', where my own note conceded it was not a measurement relation. The quote says every piece of knowledge is ASSOCIATED WITH evidences, which is attachment - and attachment is what 'part-of' says
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'every piece of knowledge we capture is associated with evidences', not 'annotations'. also in: evidences · annotations | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | CAUTION —part-of→ annotations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: a comment type carried on an entry beside its annotation - the mechanism by which a record holds a claim and a doubt about that claim at the same time
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'a CAUTION comment to the METTL14 entry', not 'annotations'. also in: CAUTION · annotations | concept_edges[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | METTL3 —distinct-from→ METTL14 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 · note: and the distinction is the whole point: they are both MT-A70 family members and both were reported to have methyltransferase activity. Only one has a working active site | concept_edges[3] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | redundancy removal —causes→ UniProtKB Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: and the reduction is the point - the paper reports that it made growth scalable rather than merely smaller
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'this process' = the redundancy removal process (previous sentences). also in: redundancy removal · UniProtKB | concept_edges[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 120 million protein entries, of which just over half a million carry annotations extracted from the literature by expert curators Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | expert biocuration reaches 35-45% of the curatable literature per species, 50% for humans Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Redundancy removal has taken about 38% of all complete proteomes (about 241 million proteins) out of UniProtKB. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Virus reference proteomes stood at 428 at the previous publication, about an order of magnitude below the 4405 known viral species. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | Structural studies showed only METTL3 is catalytic; METTL14 has a degenerate active site and a non-catalytic role. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the bibliography layer adds 902,956 unique papers over 363,591 entries, and 36,147,401 accession-PMID pairs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | UniProt data moved to a CC-BY 4.0 licence to make reuse easier - stated in the paper itself Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | UniProtKB = reviewed Swiss-Prot entries curated by an expert team, plus unreviewed TrEMBL entries annotated by automated and rule-based systems Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UniProt Knowledgebase | content_tags.definitions[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | evidences = the source tag attached to every individual piece of captured knowledge Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: evidences | content_tags.definitions[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | CAUTION = a comment telling users that an initially reported finding is an unsafe observation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: CAUTION comment | content_tags.definitions[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | UniParc = the archive holding a complete set of known sequences including historical obsolete ones, where redundancy-removed proteomes go Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: UniProt Archive | content_tags.definitions[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | UPCLASS precision 0.80, recall 0.62, F-score 0.70 - published before being applied to 32 million accession-PMID pairs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | UniRef GO propagation precision above 97% in all three GO domains - measured by comparing newly annotated sequences against the system's own earlier releases Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | 90% of proteins have over 90% identity to another, which is what makes the growth a redundancy problem rather than a knowledge one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | the two rule systems: UniRule and the Statistical Automatic Annotation System Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: rule-based prediction systems | content_tags.variables[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.