standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
| transfer | transfers | a method or concept carried in from another field |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 7 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | method Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | procedural priming of spontaneous inference formation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. Update, 15 September 2026: CLEARED evidence status='quote-not-in-current-staged-text' - the quote now locates in the current staged text, so the condition the marker recorded no longer holds. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The demonstration covers only one context, so generalisation is cautioned against. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Response latency showed no prime effect under high cognitive capacity, which the authors concede sits awkwardly with their hypotheses. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| transfers | The procedural priming paradigm, developed and used in psychology, is imported into consumer/marketing research as a tool for inducing and detecting spontaneous product inferences. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | transfers[0] | the tagger's words | |
| controls | a CONFOUND CHECK: perceived advertising cost was measured on three seven-point scales and compared across conditions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the procedural prime also changed how expensive the campaign LOOKED, so that any effect is a cost inference rather than a procedural one · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| controls | a separate undergraduate pretest of the cost cue before the main study Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: that the cost cue does not do what the design assumes it does · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | procedural priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: procedural priming | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cognitive procedures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cognitive procedures | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | effort investment rule Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: effort investment rule | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | spontaneous inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spontaneous inference | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | facilitative prime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: facilitative prime | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | suppressive prime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: suppressive prime | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | no prime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: no prime | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cognitive capacity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cognitive capacity | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | retrieval Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: retrieval | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | computation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: computation | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | demand effects Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: demand effects | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | spontaneous inferencing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spontaneous inferencing | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | quality perceptions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: quality perceptions | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | response times Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response times | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | cognitive procedure - defined by the paper as the `how` of a task rather than its content, which is the move that lets a prime about charitable giving reach a judgment about advertising Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | spontaneous, of an inference - occurring without explicit prompting and often without conscious intention; a property of HOW the inference arose, not of what it says Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the effort investment rule - the advertising claim with the advertising removed: a rule about persons and undertakings, which is what makes it primeable in a charity scenario and testable in an advertising one Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | indirect measurement of spontaneity - chosen because THE MEASUREMENT WOULD CREATE THE THING IT TESTS: asking directly whether the inference was made can produce an inference that would otherwise not have been made Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | prime, facilitative versus suppressive - a distinction drawn by the prime's relation to a target rule rather than by its subject matter. Both scenarios describe the same donation; only the reason offered for the effort differs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Kirmani and Wright (1989) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | extends → Broniarczyk and Alba (1994b) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | cognitive procedures —part-of→ procedural priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: The definitional relation, and the reason the effect crosses domains: what carries over is the procedure, so the second task need not share the first's content. also in: cognitive procedures · procedural priming | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | retrieval —distinct-from→ computation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: THE PAPER'S INFERENTIAL ENGINE, stated before it is used. Every hypothesis is this one asymmetry applied to a different condition, which is why the pair is a node pair here rather than background. also in: retrieval · computation | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | procedural priming —causes→ spontaneous inferencing Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The paper's headline claim, and the sentence after it names the mediator: the primed procedures are the effort investment rule, not anything about advertising. also in: procedural priming · spontaneous inferencing | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | suppressive prime —causes→ effort investment rule Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: Suppression here is not the absence of a prime but the presence of a COMPETING attribution - the same effort, explained by personal gain. also in: suppressive prime · effort investment rule | concept_edges[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | suppressive prime —causes→ quality perceptions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.95 · note: The confirmed half of Hypothesis 1: priming a competing attribution lowers the quality inference relative to both other conditions. also in: suppressive prime · quality perceptions | concept_edges[4] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | facilitative prime —same-as→ no prime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: THE NULL THE PAPER DID NOT WANT, and it is recorded here rather than left to the limitations layer: the facilitative prime did not raise quality ratings at all. Subjects draw the inference unprompted, so there was no headroom - which is why the paper's evidence for spontaneity has to come from response times instead. also in: facilitative prime · no prime | concept_edges[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | procedural priming —causes→ demand effects Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · strength of the relation: 0.8 · note: A METHODOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE AS AN EDGE. The prime is set in an interpersonal context and the test in a marketing one, so a subject is unlikely to connect them - which is the argument for procedural over explicit priming. also in: procedural priming · demand effects | concept_edges[7] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | ANOVA Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ANOVA | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | t-test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: t-test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Cronbach's alpha Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Cronbach's alpha | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | planned comparison Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: planned comparison | content_tags.statistics[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Quality perceptions were more favourable after the facilitative prime and no prime than after the suppressive prime. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Only in the facilitative prime condition was the speed of the quality judgment unaffected by a concurrent memory load, indicating the quality inference had already been made spontaneously at encoding. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | In the suppressive prime and no prime conditions, constraining cognitive capacity slowed quality judgments significantly, as expected if the judgment had to be computed on the spot. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The advertising cost-quality inference is not normally spontaneous, but becomes spontaneous once the cognitive procedures that underlie it are primed. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Priming the effort investment rule led subjects to make product quality evaluations without being prompted. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | When cognitive capacity was high, response times did not differ across prime conditions. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The authors suggest the ad cost-quality inference may come not from a perceived real-world correlation but from a general principle that effort reflects belief. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | procedural priming Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: procedural priming | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cognitive procedure Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cognitive procedure | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | effort investment rule Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: effort investment rule | content_tags.definitions[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | facilitative prime Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: facilitative prime | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | spontaneous inference Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: spontaneous inference | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Cognitive capacity at judgment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Cognitive capacity at judgment | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | product quality Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: product quality | content_tags.variables[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | response time for the quality judgment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.variables[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | perceived advertising cost Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: perceived advertising cost | content_tags.variables[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mood Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mood | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 84 — number of undergraduate subjects in the main experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 76 — number of subjects in the pretest that checked the primes produced the intended effort attributions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 5.74 vs 4.04 — pretest ratings of Marian's true belief in the cause after the facilitative versus suppressive prime scenario Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Xfacilitative prime= 5.52, Xsuppressive prime= 4.54, Xno prime= 5.42 — mean seven-point quality ratings of the target product in the three prime conditions Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Xhigh=11.92, Xlow=11.80 — quality-judgment response times in seconds under high and low cognitive capacity in the facilitative prime condition, which did not differ Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | $7.2 million vs $10 million — average advertising spend subjects expected for the bottled water category, against the $10 million campaign stated for the target product Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | X=4.75 vs. X=4.25, t(46)=1.56, p<0.06 — pretest quality ratings with versus without the $10 million advertising cost cue Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | seven — number of digits held in memory in the concurrent rehearsal task used to constrain cognitive capacity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.