(cid:NN). The PDF this text was extracted from encodes 2 characters in a way that names no letter, so the extractor could not say what they were. The quotes keep them because a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing — the marks are the source’s, not the tagging’s.standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 2 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no relations between claims or mechanisms. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | in-store music priming of product choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | behavioural-experiment Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: behavioural-experiment | method | the paper's words | |
| limitations | Awareness was assessed only by questionnaire self-report, and the authors themselves doubt that this establishes shoppers were genuinely unaware of the influence. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | Only two music conditions were compared; there was no silence control and no music from a non-wine-producing country, and individual differences and shopper indecision were not measured. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| controls | the French and German wines matched to each other on price and on dryness or sweetness Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: the music effect being a price or taste effect - if the wine of one country were cheaper or sweeter, the shopper would be following the wine and not the accordion · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): held | controls[0] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | product choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: product choice | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | superordinate knowledge structures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: superordinate knowledge structures | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | in-store music Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: in-store music | concepts[4] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | musical Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: musical | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | subliminal Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: subliminal | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | musical `fit` - the paper's central term, in scare quotes every time it appears and never defined except by its instances: French accordion music with French wine, German Bierkeller music with German wine. A relation between a stimulus and a product's national origin, operationalised entirely by example Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | priming, as this paper uses it - a verb applied to a PURCHASE, not to a judgement or a reaction time: stereotypical music activates a knowledge structure concerning a country and thereby primes the selection of products from it. The primed thing is which bottle leaves the shop Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | unawareness, and the authors' refusal to claim it - only six of the shoppers said the music influenced their choice, and rather than treat that as unawareness established they write that it would be interesting to discover whether they were REALLY as unaware as their answers suggested. A field study declining the unconscious it is entitled to claim Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | in-store music —causes→ product choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 0.9 · note: The claim in the title, and the design that supports it is a fortnight of alternating days in a real supermarket with the shelf positions swapped halfway - so the effect is on bottles sold, not on stated intention. also in: in-store music · product choice | concept_edges[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | superordinate knowledge structures —causes→ product choice Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · strength of the relation: 0.85 · note: THE MECHANISM, and it is hedged twice in its own sentence - 'may activate', 'suggesting how' - so it is offered as the available explanation rather than as something tested. The study measures the outcome, not the structure.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says musical pieces MAY activate knowledge structures, suggesting how music COULD influence choice; hedged. also in: superordinate knowledge structures · product choice | concept_edges[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| content_tags | stereotypically German music was expected to prime the choice of German wine Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. about this quote: QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | customers did not seem aware of the music's effect on their choices Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.