standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| relation to other work | claim_relations | how this paper stands to another: agrees, contradicts, extends, qualifies |
| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| content tag | content_tags | a finding, definition, quantity, statistic or variable named in the paper |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; none of 1 relation here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no controls. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| claim_type | mechanism Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | audiogenic seizures Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | review Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: review | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | the tagger's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | How the surplus of small GABAergic neurons produces the observed pharmacological defects at GABAergic synapses is unresolved. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the causal link between the cell-count finding and the pharmacology: IT REMAINS TO BE RESOLVED HOW THE INCREASE IN SMALL GABAergic NEURONS IN THE ICCN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KNOWN PHARMACOLOGICAL DEFECTS OBSERVED AT GABAergic SYNAPSES | limitations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The contribution of other brainstem structures to seizure propagation has not been established. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the seizure-propagation account: FURTHER STUDIES ARE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THESE OTHER STRUCTURES TO THE PROPAGATION OF SEIZURE ACTIVITY | limitations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The two candidate mechanisms offered for seizure initiation remain untested. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the initiation mechanism: TWO HYPOTHESES WILL BE TESTED IN FUTURE STUDIES: (1) INCREASED GABA UPTAKE, AND (2) INCREASED GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION | limitations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| limitations | The animal strains are named by their assigned score on a 0-9 behavioural rating scale. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any comparison between GEPR strains: a strain displaying moderate seizures with an assigned seizure score of 3 is designated GEPR-3 and used as an animal model, so the strain name is a position on the rating scale | limitations[3] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The rating scale's levels are defined by observed behaviour, and the paper prints them. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: any seizure score quoted from this literature: the seizures are scored on a 0-9 scale with 0 being no seizure and 9 a fit of wild running with an accompanying tonic seizure | limitations[4] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The cell-type census of the region is stated as a suggestion from these results. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. what this limits: the claim that four of six ICCN cell types are GABAergic: the authors give it as what these results suggest | limitations[5] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | GEPR-3 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GEPR-3 | concepts[0] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | seizure score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: seizure score | concepts[1] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | animal model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: animal model | concepts[2] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | Genetically epilepsy-prone rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Genetically epilepsy-prone rats | concepts[3] | the paper's words | |
| concepts | GABAergic inhibitory neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GABAergic inhibitory neurons | concepts[4] | the paper's words | |
| senses | GEPR-3 - A STRAIN NAME THAT IS A SCALE SCORE: a rat strain showing moderate seizures is assigned a seizure score of 3 and thereby designated GEPR-3, so a behavioural rating becomes a strain name and then a fixed kind of animal; a later comparison of GEPR-3 with GEPR-9 compares two points on an ordinal scale that have been reified into two categories Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the seizure score - A 0-9 ORDINAL WITH BEHAVIOURAL ENDPOINTS: 0 is no seizure and 9 is one fit of wild running with an accompanying tonic seizure, so the scale is anchored in observable behaviour and the number that travels in a strain name is a rank on it Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| senses | the ICCN cell-type count - OFFERED AS A SUGGESTION: the authors write that these results SUGGEST four of the six major cell types are GABAergic inhibitory neurons, so the census is a reading of the data rather than an enumeration Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 1.0 | the tagger's words |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Faingold et al. (1986a) hypothesis that GABA uptake is more efficient in the ICCN of GEPR-9s Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[0] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | contradicts → the disinhibition account carried over from hippocampal dentate gyrus findings (Farias et al. 1992; Buckmaster and Schwartzkroin 1994) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[1] | the tagger's words | |
| claim_relations | builds-on → Faye-Lund and Osen's (1985) description of the rat inferior colliculus Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_relations[2] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | GEPR-3 —is-a→ animal model Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. differs in: what fixes the category: an assigned score of 3 on the 0-9 seizure scale · strength of the relation: 1 also in: GEPR-3 · animal model | concept_edges[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | correlation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: ns in the ICCN and the audiogenic response score (Ribak et al. 1988b). - THE RESULT OR THE NUMBER IS THE CITED WORK'S. Read, not swept - the trailing-citation shape is about 55% precise and the main clause is what decides it. Second reading pass over the 25 candidates left after 2026-08-25 11:39: 9 marked, 16 refused. the same sentence, tagged twice. also in: correlation | content_tags.statistics[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | significance test Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: significance test | content_tags.statistics[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | mean Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: mean | content_tags.statistics[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | cell counting (stereological-style counts per section) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.statistics[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Epilepsy-prone GEPR-9 rats have far more GAD-positive neurons in the inferior colliculus than Sprague-Dawley rats. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Two independent anatomical methods, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation, were used to count GABAergic neurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Nissl analysis indicated the increase was not due to non-GABAergic neurons switching to a GABAergic phenotype. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Across GEPR-9s, Sprague-Dawley rats and their crossed offspring, the number of small neurons in the ICCN rises together with the audiogenic response score. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. WHOSE RESULT THIS IS: ns in the ICCN and the audiogenic response score (Ribak et al. 1988b). - THE RESULT OR THE NUMBER IS THE CITED WORK'S. Read, not swept - the trailing-citation shape is about 55% precise and the main clause is what decides it. Second reading pass over the 25 candidates left after 2026-08-25 11:39: 9 marked, 16 refused. 'a significant positive…' - a self-citation to earlier work, which is still not THIS paper's result. | content_tags.findings[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Moderately seizing GEPR-3 rats have significantly more small ICCN neurons than Sprague-Dawley rats, and the count matches the value the correlation line predicted in advance. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Knife cuts placed between the central and external nuclei of the IC block audiogenic seizures, as do lesions of the ICCN itself or of the lateral lemniscus. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The ICCN-to-external-nucleus projection is the route by which seizure activity leaves its site of initiation in the ICCN and propagates. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | The number of axosomatic synapses per soma in the ICCN is the same in GEPR-9s and Sprague-Dawley rats, which rules out the idea that the extra GABAergic neurons act by adding inhibitory contacts onto cell bodies. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[7] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Audiogenic-seizure susceptibility in GEPRs was indicated to be an autosomal dominant trait. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[8] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | Electron microscopy indicates that four of the six major cell types of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus are GABAergic inhibitory neurons. Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.findings[9] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | inferior colliculus (IC) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: inferior colliculus (IC) | content_tags.definitions[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | three subdivisions of the IC Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: three subdivisions of the IC | content_tags.definitions[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | GEPR-3 Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: GEPR-3 | content_tags.definitions[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | genetically epilepsy-prone rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: genetically epilepsy-prone rats | content_tags.definitions[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | seizure score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: seizure score | content_tags.definitions[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | lesion site Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: lesion site | content_tags.variables[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | seizure severity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: seizure severity | content_tags.variables[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | total number of Nissl-stained cells Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: total number of Nissl-stained cells | content_tags.variables[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | sizes of ICCN neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: sizes of ICCN neurons | content_tags.variables[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 200% — increase in small GAD-positive cells in the IC of GEPR-9s relative to Sprague-Dawley rats (medium cells increased 90%) Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[0] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 100% — increase in small Nissl-stained neurons in the ICCN of GEPRs, against a 30% increase for medium-sized neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[1] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 70% — excess of small ICCN neurons in GEPR-9s over SD rats in the 2-micrometre semi-thin section counts, with medium neurons up 30% Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[2] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 25% ... 36% — proportion of small ICCN neurons that are GAD-positive in Sprague-Dawley rats versus GEPR-9s Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[3] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 0.91 — coefficient of linear correlation between audiogenic response score and the number of small ICCN neurons Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[4] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 29.50+2.17 — mean small-neuron count per unit area in the ICCN of GEPR-3 rats Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[5] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 3:1 — minimum ratio of seizure-prone to seizure-resistant offspring in GEPR-9 x Sprague-Dawley crosses Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[6] | the tagger's words | |
| content_tags | 28 rats — number of animals contributing to the correlation between small-neuron number and audiogenic response score Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | content_tags.quantities[7] | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.