standOff, and the article is at its publisher via the link below. When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.| claim type | claim_type | the shape of the claim: existence, mechanism, method, critique, prediction, null |
| concept edge | concept_edges | an asserted relation between two concepts, with the sentence asserting it |
| concept | concepts | an idea the paper works with, quoted where the paper uses it |
| contribution | contribution | what the paper claims to add |
| control | controls | an experiment run to eliminate a rival explanation |
| limitation | limitations | what the paper says its evidence cannot support |
| mechanism | mechanisms | how the reported effect is said to come about |
| method | method | how the paper produced its evidence |
| object of study | object_of_study | what the paper is about — the thing it investigates |
| phenomenon | phenomenon | the effect or regularity under study |
| research question | research_question | the question the paper sets itself |
| sense | senses | a distinct use of a term, quoted where the paper fixes it |
Relations on this page carry a quotation for the claim. Where a relation was separately evidenced — and so tested against the vocabulary for its type — the row says so; 7 of 8 relations here carry that mark. The rest are the tagger’s reading of the sentence quoted beside them.
This record holds no relations between claims. A layer is empty when the tagger recorded nothing in it — which is not the same as the paper having nothing to record.
| facet | tag | field | conf. | whose words |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| object_of_study | what eighteen older adults with no tablet experience say about tablets and technology, in three focus groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | object_of_study | the paper's words | |
| research_question | what older adults perceive as the advantages, disadvantages and barriers of interacting with tablets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | research_question | the paper's words | |
| contribution | a thematic account in which eagerness to adopt coexists with low confidence, and instruction rather than motivation is the reported obstacle Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | contribution | the paper's words | |
| claim_type | existence Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | claim_type | the paper's words | |
| phenomenon | slower adoption of new technology by older adults Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | phenomenon | the paper's words | |
| method | interpretive Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: interpretive | method | the paper's words | |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| mechanisms | mechanisms Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | mechanisms[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | The sample is small and the paper says larger studies are needed before the findings generalise Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | RESPONSE BIAS IN A FOCUS GROUP IS NAMED BY THE AUTHORS: the enthusiasm reported should be read with caution because of the setting in which it was expressed Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | SELECTION BIAS WAS NOT ACTIVELY PREVENTED - stated in those words - and is argued against afterwards from the data rather than designed out Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Participants were naive tablet users by design, so the findings do not speak for experienced users Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| limitations | Recruitment was by snowball sampling in one city, which the paper reports and does not treat as a limitation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | limitations[4] | 0.85 | the tagger's words |
| controls | one third of participants reported being undecided or unlikely to use a tablet in future, offered as evidence that the sample was not only enthusiasts Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. eliminates: selection bias toward people already interested in tablets · outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation): partial | controls[0] | 0.9 | the tagger's words |
| concepts | thematic analysis Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: thematic analysis | concepts[0] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | qualitative design Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: qualitative design | concepts[1] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | focus groups Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: focus groups | concepts[2] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | older adults Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: older adults | concepts[3] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | tablet computers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tablet computers | concepts[4] | 0.85 | the paper's words |
| concepts | barriers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: barriers | concepts[5] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | technology acceptance Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: technology acceptance | concepts[6] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | diffusion of innovations Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: diffusion of innovations | concepts[7] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | response bias Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: response bias | concepts[8] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | selection bias Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: selection bias | concepts[9] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | snowball principle Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: snowball principle | concepts[10] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | portable computer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: portable computer | concepts[11] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Tablets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Tablets | concepts[12] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | touch-based interface Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: touch-based interface | concepts[13] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | computer self-efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: computer self-efficacy | concepts[14] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | computer anxiety Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: computer anxiety | concepts[15] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | cognitive deficits Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: cognitive deficits | concepts[16] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | low self-efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: low self-efficacy | concepts[17] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | ability to use technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: ability to use technology | concepts[18] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | direct experience with computers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: direct experience with computers | concepts[19] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | more positive attitudes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: more positive attitudes | concepts[20] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | community-based computer and internet training program Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[21] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | computer and internet skill Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: computer and internet skill | concepts[22] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Selection Optimization Compensation (SOC) Theory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | concepts[23] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | selection Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: selection | concepts[24] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | optimization Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: optimization | concepts[25] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | compensation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: compensation | concepts[26] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | Adult Learning Theory Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: Adult Learning Theory | concepts[27] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | tablet refinement Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: tablet refinement | concepts[28] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | acceptance and adoption of tablets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: acceptance and adoption of tablets | concepts[29] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| concepts | young-old Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. also in: young-old | concepts[30] | 0.95 | the paper's words |
| senses | barriers - IN THIS STUDY A PARTICIPANT-REPORTED CATEGORY, not a measured obstacle: what people said stopped them, grouped by thematic analysis - lack of instruction, lack of confidence, health, cost Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[0] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | cost - A BARRIER ONLY FOR THE EXPERIENCED. The paper notices that only participants with prior computer experience raised it, and offers the reading that inexperience means not knowing what the devices cost Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[1] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Tablet computers - portable computers with a touchscreen Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Technology adoption - associated with cognition, computer self-efficacy and anxiety; higher anxiety predicts lower use Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | portable computer - the class to which the paper assigns tablet computers Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Tablets - portable touchscreen computers with less operating-system complexity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | touch-based interface - the interface tablets comprise and that the paper associates with reduced complexity Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | computer self-efficacy - one variable associated with technology adoption among older adults Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | computer anxiety - an adoption correlate whose higher values predicted lower technology use Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | cognitive deficits - an age-associated factor reported to reduce ability to use technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[9] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | low self-efficacy - an age-associated factor reported to reduce ability to use technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[10] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | ability to use technology - the technology-use capacity reduced by cognitive deficits and low self-efficacy Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[11] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | direct experience with computers - hands-on computer experience reported to produce more positive attitudes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[12] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | more positive attitudes - the attitude outcome reported after direct computer experience Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[13] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | community-based computer and internet training program - a community intervention for older adults' computer and internet learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[14] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | computer and internet skill - the capability that the evaluated training program can increase Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[15] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Selection Optimization Compensation (SOC) Theory - a life-management theory built from selection, optimization, and compensation Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[16] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | selection - goals in the SOC account Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[17] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | optimization - goal-related means used to achieve desired goals in the SOC account Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[18] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | compensation - reaction to loss in goal-related means that maintains success or desired goals Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[19] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | Adult Learning Theory - the account in which adults participate in planning/evaluating instruction and experience grounds learning Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[20] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | tablet refinement - device improvement informed by older adults' reported needs Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[21] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | acceptance and adoption of tablets - the older-adult outcome whose potential the paper says refinement can increase Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[22] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| senses | young-old - the 65-75-year age band used to restrict the study sample Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. | senses[23] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | thematic analysis —part-of→ qualitative design Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. strength of the relation: 1 also in: thematic analysis · qualitative design | concept_edges[1] | the tagger's words | |
| concept_edges | tablet computers —is-a→ portable computer Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper gives an unhedged class definition: tablet computers are a type of portable computer. also in: tablet computers · portable computer | concept_edges[2] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | touch-based interface —part-of→ Tablets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper unhedgedly says tablets comprise a touch-based interface. also in: touch-based interface · Tablets | concept_edges[3] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | cognitive deficits —causes→ ability to use technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The cited study reports a significant reduction without an epistemic hedge. · the relation stated: cognitive deficits and low self-efficacy associated with older age significantly reduced participants' ability to use technology
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports Alvseike and Brønnick (2012). also in: cognitive deficits · ability to use technology | concept_edges[4] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | low self-efficacy —causes→ ability to use technology Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: reduces · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The cited study reports a significant reduction without an epistemic hedge. · the relation stated: cognitive deficits and low self-efficacy associated with older age significantly reduced participants' ability to use technology
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports Alvseike and Brønnick (2012). also in: low self-efficacy · ability to use technology | concept_edges[5] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | direct experience with computers —causes→ more positive attitudes Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 1 · note: The paper reports that direct experience resulted in more positive attitudes.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports 'an earlier study'. | concept_edges[6] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | community-based computer and internet training program —causes→ computer and internet skill Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: The cited evaluation concludes the program 'can be effective' in increasing skill; weight 0.7 preserves the modal language.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but attributed: the span reports an evaluation that concluded the program CAN be effective. | concept_edges[7] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
| concept_edges | tablet refinement —causes→ acceptance and adoption of tablets Quotation withheld — this record is not cleared for redistribution. The sentence is in the paper at the link above. direction on the measure: increases · the relation itself is separately evidenced · strength of the relation: 0.7 · note: The paper says its findings 'may be used' for refinement, thereby increasing adoption potential; weight 0.7 preserves that projected use.
Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says the findings MAY inform refinement, increasing the POTENTIAL for adoption; hedged. | concept_edges[8] | 0.95 | the tagger's words |
Tags that could not be placed in the text:
What was deliberately not tagged, and why, is recorded per paper by the tagger. Where a paper has no such record, this page says so rather than implying that nothing was declined.