phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text| phenomenon | distractor-response binding— “The paradigm of distractor-response binding is useful to investigate influences of distractors that compete with the target stimulus for a response execution.” | |
| claim-type | method— “The distractor-response binding paradigm can be used to investigate this influence.” | |
| method — evidence | — “The present article gives a detailed description of the paradigm used to analyze the distractor-based retrieval and distractor inhibition.” | |
| object of study — evidence | — “The paradigm of distractor-response binding was developed to specifically investigate the influence distractors that compete with a target stimulus for the response, have on action control.” | |
| research question — evidence | — “In particular, this technique allows to disentangle the two mechanisms that have been discussed in the context of distractor processing, namely distractor inhibition and distractor based retrieval of responses.” | |
| transfer | from : The paradigm is modality-independent: the same binding effect and the same response-time modulation appear in visual, auditory and tactile versions, which the paper reads as evidence that the mechanism is central rather than perceptual— “Although mean response times modulate the effect, this modulation seems to be the same in previous visual, tactile, and auditory experiments (see Figure 4 ). These results also suggest that the effect evidences a rather central mechanism of action control.” | transfers[0] |
| mechanism | Re-encountering a stimulus that was bound into an event file retrieves the whole stored episode, including the response executed with it, so an ignored distractor can drive the current response.— “Re-encountering the stimulus of such an event file leads to a retrieval of the entire episode from memory, including the associated response 4-8 .” | mechanisms[0] |
| mechanism | Retrieval runs in parallel with the algorithm computing the required response, so the longer the response takes, the more often retrieval finishes in time to influence it - which is why slower tasks show larger binding effects.— “With longer lags between triggering response retrieval and execution of the response, the retrieval process is more likely to be completed before response execution 22 .” | mechanisms[1] |
| mechanism | Inhibiting the same distractor twice in a row carries after-effects that facilitate the second inhibition, producing a benefit that is independent of whether the response repeats.— “That is, an inhibition account 1,25 would predict, that inhibiting the same stimulus two times in a row should always lead to benefits because after effects from distractor inhibition on the prime should facilitate distractor inhibition on the probe.” | mechanisms[2] |
| mechanism | A stimulus and a response executed close together in time are stored as one episodic trace, so re-encountering the stimulus retrieves the whole episode including the response— “Re-encountering the stimulus of such an event file leads to a retrieval of the entire episode from memory, including the associated response 4-8 .” | mechanisms[3] |
| mechanism | Because the distractor is bound into the same trace as the target and response, the distractor alone can trigger retrieval of the target's response— “On the next encounter, any of these stimuli ( i.e. also the distractor stimulus) can trigger the retrieval of the entire event file including the target response.” | mechanisms[4] |
| mechanism | Retrieval therefore helps when the response repeats and hurts when it changes, which is why the signature is an interaction rather than a main effect— “In contrast, if a change of response is required, repeating the distractor hampers responding as the distractor retrieves an incompatible response.” | mechanisms[5] |
| mechanism | Inhibition predicts a benefit from distractor repetition that does not depend on response repetition, which is what makes the two mechanisms separable in one design— “This benefit effect of repeated distractors is, however, according to the inhibition theory independent of response repetition.” | mechanisms[6] |
| mechanism | Retrieval runs in parallel with computing the required response, so slower tasks give retrieval more time to finish and produce larger effects— “This can be understood as a consequence of the retrieval process working in parallel to the… | mechanisms[7] |
| builds-on | the negative priming paradigm (review by Fox) | claim_relations[0] |
| extends | the negative priming paradigm | claim_relations[1] |
| extends | the negative priming paradigm, from which this paradigm originates Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[2] |
| extends | the Stimulus Response Retrieval theory and the Theory of Event Coding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[3] |
| critiques | the pure inhibition account of negative priming, which cannot be separated from retrieval in that paradigm Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[4] |
| sense | distractor repetition effect - as an INTERACTION with response relation: the signature of retrieval, i.e. of distractor-response binding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[0] |
| sense | distractor repetition effect - as a MAIN EFFECT: the signature of inhibition, read off the same design and the same data Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[1] |
| sense | response repetition - with the same target identity (RRi): excluded from analysis because target repetition would confound it Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[2] |
| sense | response repetition - with a different target from the same response category (RR): the condition actually analysed Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[3] |
| sense | negative priming - under the inhibition account: residual inhibition of the former distractor makes responding to it harder Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[4] |
| sense | negative priming - under the retrieval account: a do-not-respond tag encoded with the distractor is retrieved and conflicts with responding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | senses[5] |
| control | varying response relation (repetition vs change) and distractor relation (repetition vs change) orthogonally in a 2x2 design — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out that a distractor-repetition effect is confounded with response repetition, and that distractor inhibition cannot be told apart from response retrieval Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| control | random assignment of stimuli from the stimulus set to the roles of prime target, prime distractor, probe target and probe distractor within each trial type — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out that the effect is driven by particular stimuli rather than by the repetition relations between them Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[1] |
| differs in | the pure inhibition account of negative priming, which cannot be separated from retrieval in that paradigm — THE AXIS IS WHETHER THE PARADIGM CAN SEPARATE TWO MECHANISMS. 'One difficulty with this paradigm has been that at least two different mechanisms can account for the negative priming effect.' The effect is not disputed; what is disputed is that observing it tells you which mechanism produced it - so every result in that paradigm is evidence for a disjunction. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | claim_relations[4] |
| edge | instance —same-as→ event file Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[0] |
| edge | event file —part-of→ episodic memory Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| edge | distractor inhibition —part-of→ cognitive control Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[2] |
| edge | distractor-response binding —contrasted-with→ negative priming Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[4] |
| audit | distractor inhibition —contrasted-with→ response retrieval — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'distractor based retrieval of responses', not 'response retrieval'. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[6] |
| audit | distractor-response binding —operationalised-as→ response relation — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but a significant interaction of response relation and distractor relation INDICATES distractor-response binding; operationalised-as is loose. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[7] |
| audit | distractor inhibition —operationalised-as→ distractor relation — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span writes 'the main effect of distractor repetition', not 'distractor relation'. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[8] |
| audit | do-not-respond tag —causes→ negative priming — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: the example follows 'negative priming can be the result of retrieval mechanisms' (previous sentence). Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[13] |
| weight | do-not-respond tag —causes→ negative priming — 0.7 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[13] |
| audit | Gestalt principles —causes→ distractor-response binding — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but 'another prerequisite SEEMS to be' grouped presentation; 'Gestalt principles' is not in the span and causes is hedged. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[14] |
| weight | Gestalt principles —causes→ distractor-response binding — 0.8 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[14] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[1] |
| duplicate of | limitation — limitations[4] Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| replication | replicated | |
| limitation | The factors that modulate the distractor-response binding effect are not yet fully specified. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[0] |
| limitation | The paradigm has been validated in only one clinical sample (unpublished), so the trial numbers needed for individual-difference work are unknown. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| limitation | The effect fails if the gap between prime response and probe onset is too long Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| limitation | Grouping of target and distractor appears to be required, and the full set of modulating conditions is not yet known Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[3] |
| limitation | Only one clinical sample has been looked at, and that data is unpublished, so trial numbers for individual-difference work are unknown Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[4] |
| limitation | Error rates usually yield nothing, so the paradigm effectively rests on response times alone Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[5] |
| limitation | Trials repeating the target identity must be dropped from analysis to keep target-based bindings out, yet kept in the procedure to stop participants responding strategically Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[6] |
finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text| finding | Repeating a distractor speeds responding when the same response must be repeated, because the distractor retrieves a compatible response. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[0] |
| finding | Repeating a distractor slows responding when the response must change, because the distractor retrieves the now-incompatible response. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[1] |
| finding | The paradigm's central advantage is that response retrieval shows up as the response-by-distractor interaction while distractor inhibition shows up as the distractor main effect, so the two mechanisms can be read off separately from the same design. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[2] |
| finding | Distractor-response binding effects become larger with more difficult tasks and thus with longer response times. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[3] |
| finding | The modulation of the binding effect by response time can be represented by one function for all modalities. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[4] |
| finding | No distractor-response binding effect was found at an onset asynchrony of 1,500 msec. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[5] |
| finding | Presenting target and distractor grouped together appears to be a precondition for the effect. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[6] |
| finding | Error rates usually carry no significant effects because participants commit too few errors. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[7] |
| finding | Imposing an 800 msec response window, or varying the prime-probe gap between 150 and 350 msec, leaves the result pattern intact. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[8] |
| finding | Unpublished data from participants with autism spectrum disorder suggest the effect is obtainable in a clinical sample with the same number of trials. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[9] |
| quantity | 180 trials — Total number of experimental trials produced by repeating each of the six trial types 30 times Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[0] |
| quantity | 60 trials — Size of the practice block drawn at random before the main experiment Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[1] |
| quantity | 33 experiments (27 visual, five auditory, one tactile) — Number and modality breakdown of the published experiments whose binding effects are summarised against mean response time Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[2] |
| quantity | 50% — Share of the between-experiment variance in binding effects explained by the fitted function of mean response time Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[3] |
| quantity | 1,500 msec — Prime-probe onset asynchrony at which no distractor-response binding effect was obtained Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[4] |
| quantity | 300 msec — Fixed stimulus presentation duration that still reproduced the binding pattern Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[5] |
| variable | response relation (independent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[0] |
| variable | distractor relation (distractor repetition vs. distractor change) (independent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[1] |
| variable | probe response time (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[2] |
| variable | probe error rate (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[3] |
| variable | stimulus arrangement (control) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[4] |
| variable | target identity repetition (control) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[6] |
| definition | distractor-response binding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[0] |
| definition | negative priming effect Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[1] |
| definition | event file Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[2] |
| definition | instance Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[3] |
| definition | selective attention Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[4] |
| definition | Stimulus Response Retrieval theory Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[5] |
| definition | distractor inhibition Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[6] |
| definition | event file Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[7] |
| definition | distractor repetition effect Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[8] |
| key-terms | distractor-response binding, distractor inhibition, response retrieval, event file, instance, episodic memory, selective attention, cognitive control, negative priming, Stimulus Response Retrieval theory, Theory of Event Coding, prime, probe, response relation, distractor relation, selection task, onset asynchrony |
| ANOVA | as written: 2 (Response Relation: repetition vs. change) × 2 (Distractor Relation: repetition vs. change) ANOVA Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[0] |
| interaction effect × | as written: interaction effect of response repetition × distractor repetition Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[1] |
| main effect | as written: significant main effect of distractor repetition Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[2] |
| standard error | as written: standard error of the means Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[3] |
| outlier removal | as written: exclude anticipatory (below 200 msec) and outlier response times ( e.g. Tukey ) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[4] |
| confidence interval | as written: The confidence interval is indicated by broken lines Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[5] |
| explained variance | as written: the function explaining 50% of the variance Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[6] |
| mean | as written: mean response time in distractor change trials minus the mean response time in distractor repetition trials Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[7] |
| claim type | method — a second reading reaching the same value; recorded: method Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | alternatives.claim_type |
| phenomenon | distractor-response binding — a second reading reaching the same value; recorded: distractor-response binding Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | alternatives.phenomenon |
When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher
and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification.
· back to index
· concepts · authors
· עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824