phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text| phenomenon | priming of cultural diversity models— “In these studies, we examined the effects on Hong Kong residents of presenting cultural diversity within China in terms of either multiculturalism or assimilation.” | |
| claim-type | mechanism— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and multicultural identity styles; the assimilation… | |
| method — evidence | — “Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: assimilation prime (N = 54), multiculturalism prime (N = 58), or control (N = 56).” | |
| mechanism | Reading a societal diversity model first elicits an emotional reaction, and that emotional reaction is what carries the prime through to intergroup attitudes and identity— “Thus, we propose that priming societal models that relate to outgroups could elicit emotional responses; specifically, especially among a young university student population, multicultural primes might lead to more positive emotions than assimilation primes, which could serve as the underlying processes that explain their effects on attitudes… | mechanisms[0] |
| mechanism | A multicultural frame lowers the perceived threat to the local culture, which raises the perceived compatibility of the two cultures and so reduces disgust at their mixing— “It is likely that to the degree that multiculturalism reduced Hongkongers’ perceived sense of threat, it enhanced the perceived compatibility of these cultures, as shown by reduced disgust toward mixed cultural symbols and increased integration of Chinese and Hong Kong identities; while assimilation had the opposite effects.” | mechanisms[1] |
| contradicts | Verkuyten (2005), on multiculturalism priming among Turkish minorities in the Netherlands— “This is dissimilar from previous research among Turkish minorities in the Netherlands, where priming multiculturalism tended to decrease outgroup evaluations relative to ingroup evaluations (Verkuyten, 2005).” | claim_relations[0] |
| builds-on | Todd and Galinsky (2012) multiculturalism priming materials— “The instructions and Multiculturalism priming material were adapted from previous research in the United States (Todd and Galinsky, 2012) with content modified through group discussions to fit the Hong Kong cultural context.” | claim_relations[1] |
| builds-on | Stone and Crisp (2007) superordinate-identity assimilation priming material— “The priming material was adapted from a previous study about assimilating into superordinate identities (Stone and Crisp, 2007) and modified to emphasize the assimilation process.” | claim_relations[2] |
| extends | Morrison et al. (2010), on symbolic threat as mediator of reactions to multiculturalism primes— “The results are an interesting complement to findings of Morrison et al. (2010), who found that White Americans’ negative reaction to multiculturalism primes (vs. color-blindness) was mediated by their sense of symbolic threat; here, we find that Hong Kong participants’ negative reaction to an assimilation prime (vs. multiculturalism) was… | claim_relations[3] |
| sense | multiculturalism against assimilation and colorblindness - THREE DIVERSITY MODELS ON ONE AXIS, and the axis is stated: whether cultural difference is APPRECIATED or IGNORED. Colorblindness and assimilation are put on the same side, which is a grouping this literature does not always make— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | senses[0] |
| sense | social distance, as measured here - a construct defined by the EXTENT of contact refused, from marriage down to co-residence in a city. The scale is the definition, which is what makes `prejudice` operational in this design— “Desire to keep one’s social distance from outgroups (Bogardus, 1925, 1947), ranging from being unwilling to marry an outgroup member up to even being unwilling to live in the same city” | senses[1] |
| sense | the prime, in this study - not a word list or a photograph but A DESCRIPTION OF THE READER'S OWN COUNTRY: a passage about how China handles diversity, read by Hong Kong students who are both minority and majority culture members. The manipulation is a national self-description— “Results show new evidence of the importance of emotion in how non-immigrant regional groups, who are both minority and majority culture members, react to different diversity models” | senses[2] |
| control | a CULTURAL control condition against the multicultural priming condition — held — rules out that any culture-related prime reduces social distancing - the control is cultural in content and differs only in being multicultural— “Study 1 compared a multicultural priming condition to a and cultural control condition and found that the multiculturalism prime significantly reduced desire to socially distance from Mainland Chinese.” | controls[0] |
| control | participants randomly assigned to the priming or the no-prime condition on beginning the questionnaire — held — rules out that a difference between conditions is a difference between the people in them— “Upon beginning the questionnaire, participants were randomly assigned into either the priming condition or in the the no prime condition.” | controls[1] |
| differs in | multiculturalism —distinct-from→ assimilation — WHETHER CULTURAL DIFFERENCE IS APPRECIATED OR IGNORED - the paper states the axis rather than leaving it to be inferred, and puts colorblindness on the ignoring side with assimilation— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences”— “a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | concept_edges[0] |
| note | multiculturalism —distinct-from→ assimilation — Two edges come out of this one clause. The grouping is the part worth noting: colorblindness and assimilation are often distinguished elsewhere and are treated here as one side of a single contrast.— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | concept_edges[0] |
| weight | multiculturalism —distinct-from→ assimilation — 0.95— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | concept_edges[0] |
| note | multiculturalism —distinct-from→ colorblindness — The second half of the same contrast, kept as its own edge because a reader searching for either model should meet the axis at the same place.— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | concept_edges[1] |
| weight | multiculturalism —distinct-from→ colorblindness — 0.95— “Models of Cultural Diversity Multiculturalism emphasizes the appreciation of different cultural values, traditions, and lifestyles, in contrast to colorblindness or assimilation, which reflect a preference toward ignoring cultural differences” | concept_edges[1] |
| effect direction | multiculturalism —causes→ social distancing — reduces— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and multicultural identity styles; the assimilation…— “indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese” | concept_edges[2] |
| note | multiculturalism —causes→ social distancing — INDIRECT, and the paper says so: the route is through increased positive emotions, not directly. The same sentence reports the assimilation prime producing the opposite effects through negative emotions, which is the symmetry the design was built for.— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and multicultural identity styles; the assimilation… | concept_edges[2] |
| weight | multiculturalism —causes→ social distancing — 0.85— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and multicultural identity styles; the assimilation… | concept_edges[2] |
| audit | assimilation —causes→ social distancing — Audit 2026-09-28: RESTORED AND DOUBTFUL - the full span was re-read; kept, but the full span does report an assimilation effect: the paper reports that the assimilation prime worked the other way, through more negative emotions, so it indirectly increased social distancing (reworded 2026-09-28 so that this note no longer quotes the paper, whose text is not cleared for redistribution) - kept, but the effect is INDIRECT (through negative emotions) and the edge's direction 'increases' holds only through that indirect path (corrected 2026-09-28: this note first said the edge carried no direction, but the edge has carried 'increases' throughout); the withdrawal said no assimilation effect was reported. The earlier withdrawal is kept in the record.— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and multicultural identity styles; the assimilation… | concept_edges[3] |
| effect direction | assimilation —causes→ social distancing — increases— “Study 2 compared multiculturalism, assimilation, or control primes’ effects, and found that the multiculturalism prime, through increased positive emotions, indirectly reduced social distancing from Mainland Chinese and disgust toward culture mixing, and increased Chinese ethnic identity and… | concept_edges[3] |
| note | assimilation —causes→ social distancing — The mirror edge, and weighted slightly lower because 'the opposite indirect effects' is stated by reference to the first result rather than reported in its own terms here. | concept_edges[3] |
| weight | assimilation —causes→ social distancing — 0.8 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation) | control — held | controls[0] |
| outcome (stated by the tagger, no quotation) | control — held | controls[1] |
| evidential status | mechanism — the paper's own words: we propose that Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | mechanisms[0] |
| replication | contested | |
| limitation | Both studies were underpowered for the effect sizes assumed. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[0] |
| limitation | Convenience sample of Hong Kong university students limits generalisation. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| limitation | Identity measures were placed after the manipulation, so they could not be used as moderators. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| limitation | Because the two identity styles were outcomes rather than predictors, their distinct functions could not be separated. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[3] |
finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text| finding | In Study 1 the multiculturalism prime lowered desire for social distance from Mainland Chinese relative to no prime, but left disgust toward culture mixing and national identity strength unchanged. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[0] |
| finding | In Study 2 the three primes produced direct effects only on emotion and on ethnic Chinese identity strength; social distancing, disgust and both identity styles showed no direct priming effect. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[1] |
| finding | Relative to control, the multiculturalism prime raised positive emotion and thereby indirectly cut disgust toward culture mixing and raised ethnic identity strength, hybrid identity style and alternating identity style, with a marginal indirect reduction in social distancing. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[2] |
| finding | The assimilation prime produced the mirror-image indirect pattern, lowering positive emotion and thereby increasing social distancing and disgust while decreasing ethnic identity strength and both multicultural identity styles. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[3] |
| finding | Reading that Hong Kong is being assimilated into China lowered participants' ethnic identity strength compared with the control condition. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[4] |
| finding | Breaking the affect composite apart, the beneficial multiculturalism effects ran specifically through pride, happiness and interest. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[5] |
| quantity | n = 118 — final analysed sample of Study 1, split 57 primed and 61 no-prime Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[0] |
| quantity | 168 — sample size of Study 2, which the authors call slightly underpowered Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[1] |
| quantity | t(116) = −2.19, p = 0.03, d = 0.40 — Study 1 effect of the multiculturalism prime on social distancing Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[2] |
| quantity | F(2,165) = 15.19, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.16 — overall Study 2 effect of priming condition on positive emotion Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[3] |
| quantity | Cohen’s d = 0.93 — size of the positive-emotion gap between the multiculturalism and assimilation prime groups Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[4] |
| quantity | ω = 0.90 and α = 0.90 — internal reliability of the Study 1 social distancing scale Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[5] |
| variable | social distancing from Mainland Chinese (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[1] |
| variable | disgust toward Hong Kong-Mainland culture mixing (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[2] |
| variable | multicultural identity styles (dependent) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[3] |
| variable | age and gender (covariate) Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[5] |
| definition | multiculturalism Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[0] |
| definition | Positive Emotion Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[2] |
| definition | social distance Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[3] |
| definition | hybrid identity style Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[4] |
| definition | alternating identity style Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[5] |
| concept | multiculturalism — not defined in this paper's own words; one of three diversity models the paper sets on a single axis, and the only one on the appreciating side of it Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[0] |
| concept | assimilation — not defined in this paper's own words; its opposite on that axis, grouped with colorblindness because both prefer to ignore difference rather than because they are otherwise alike Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[1] |
| concept | colorblindness — not defined in this paper's own words; the third model, and the paper puts it on the same side as assimilation - a grouping worth recording, because the two are usually distinguished elsewhere Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[2] |
| concept | social distance — not defined in this paper's own words; the prejudice measure, and it is defined by its RANGE rather than by a construct: from unwillingness to marry an outgroup member up to unwillingness to share a city Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[3] |
| concept | culture mixing — not defined in this paper's own words; the everyday phenomenon the second attitude measure is about - cultural symbols coexisting or fusing, which the paper illustrates with logos and international brands Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[4] |
| concept | social distancing — not defined in this paper's own words; the same measure as it is named in the results - and the effect on it is reported as INDIRECT, running through emotions rather than directly from the prime Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[5] |
| t-test t | as written: independent sample t-tests Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[0] |
| ANOVA F | as written: An overall ANOVA predicting positive emotion Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[1] |
| eta squared (effect size) η2 | as written: η2 = 0.16 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[2] |
| chi-squared test χ2 | as written: The Chi-square test Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[3] |
| ANCOVA | as written: ANCOVA tests with conditions as fixed factor, age and gender as covariates Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[4] |
| Tukey post hoc correction | as written: Post hoc analyses with Tukey correction Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[5] |
| effect size (Cohen's d) with confidence interval d | as written: Cohen’s d = 0.40, 95% CI = [0.04,0.77] Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[6] |
| Pearson correlation r | as written: Bivariate Pearson Correlations Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[7] |
| Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) α | as written: Cronbach’s α = 0.90 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[8] |
| McDonald's omega (internal consistency) ω | as written: McDonald’s ω = 0.90 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[9] |
| mediation / path analysis with maximum likelihood and robust standard errors | as written: tested in path analysis using lavaan Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[10] |
| Monte Carlo simulation power analysis | as written: post hoc power analysis ... with Monte Carlo simulation method Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[11] |
| Mahalanobis distance (outlier exclusion) | as written: excluded based on Mahalanobis distance Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.statistics[12] |
When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher
and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification.
· back to index
· concepts · authors
· עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824