The Emotional Arcs of Stories Are Dominated by Six Basic Shapes — TEI-tagged view

Andrew J. Reagan, Lewis Mitchell, Dilan Kiley, Christopher M. Danforth, Peter Sheridan Dodds · 2016 · literature · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0093-1 · full text at the source · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (pdftext); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. The PDF extraction replaced most in-body numerals and citation markers with private-use glyphs, so sentences such as the Vonnegut thesis sentence and 'this result generally agrees with other attempts that use only hierarchical clustering' could not be quoted intact; only spans free of those glyphs were used, which is why the agreement-with-prior-clustering-work relation is not recorded. method is 'computational-text-analysis' (sentiment time series plus SVD, Ward clustering and a self-organizing map); none of the suggested method values covers it. 2026-08-14, 2026-08-15 and 2026-08-16 schema-0.3 passes: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node. Update, 15 September 2026: EXCEPTION, measured with the merge gate's own predicate (Paper.locate): 1 quote(s) on this record are not found as one exact string in the current staged text - limitations[0].evidence. The sentence above does not hold for them as written. Where a row records why - the quote is grounded in another copy of the paper, joins two passages with an ellipsis, or differs from the staged text by extraction noise - that note stays on the row.
The quality of the text these quotes were cut from. symbol-font-not-extractable: 13 '(cid:NNN)' glyph-index markers remain in a staged text of 30,297 characters, where the PDF's embedded font had no ToUnicode map. THE QUOTES ON THIS RECORD ARE THE PAPER'S AND THE STAGED COPY IS THE DAMAGED ONE - which is the opposite of the usual case and is why it went unnoticed: one of its 92 live quotes is not an exact substring of this text, and it was located in it by aligning the quote's WORD SEQUENCE under exactly this damage - the words are there, the characters inside them are not. Not repaired in place: editing the staged text moves every offset after the edit and re-hashes every anchor on the record. Measured at 113aae60fefc3eb1, re-measured unchanged at 54b63482778ddf56.
2 quotes on this page carry a character that renders as nothing. 12 such characters in all: a private-use glyph. The PDF this text came from used characters that survive extraction as code points no ordinary font draws, so the quote reads as though they were never there. That can change what a sentence says: a soft hyphen left by a line break puts a space inside a word, so document reads as docu ment; a flattened superscript turns 10⁹ into 109. The quotes are reproduced exactly as the extraction left them and have NOT been repaired — the meaning of such a code point belongs to the one PDF it came from, and guessing it would produce a clean, confident, unverifiable quote.
3 quotes on this page were cut from a different copy of this article. This project holds two extractions of this paper: the plain text every other quote here is anchored in, and the publisher’s own HTML edition, which we are not licensed to republish. They are verbatim in the second and cannot be found in the first — not because the tagging is wrong, but because the extraction damaged the passage: a page number dropped into the middle of a number, a formula moved out of its sentence, a ligature where two letters belong. The record names the copy for each one. The quote is the paper’s; the extraction is not.
Other fields define these differently the same word, defined another way in another discipline
sample-size 5 fields · supervised learning 3 fields · sentiment analysis 2 fields · variance 2 fields
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
emotional arc sentiment analysis3 narrative structure distant reading3 plot Hedonometer labMT folkloristics matrix decomposition singular value decomposition4 supervised learning15 agglomerative (hierarchical) clustering Ward’s method unsupervised learning5 self-organizing map neural network6 Rags to riches Tragedy2 Riches to rags Man in a hole Icarus Cinderella Oedipus word salad nonsense null model4 corpus-analysis16
Method, as described: computational-text-analysis

Our tag layer for this paper

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenonemotional arcs of stories— “Here, we use a simple, robust sentiment analysis tool to extract the reader-perceived emotional content of written stories as they unfold on the page.”
claim-typeexistence— “Here, by classifying the emotional arcs for a filtered subset of 1,327 stories from Project Gutenberg’s fiction collection, we find a set of six core emotional arcs which form the essential building blocks of complex emotional trajectories.”
method — evidence— “For our analysis, we apply three independent tools: matrix decomposition by singular value decomposition (SVD), supervised learning by agglomerative (hierarchical) clustering with Ward’s method, and unsupervised learning by a self-organizing map (SOM, a type of neural network).”
transferfrom natural language processing (sentiment analysis): sentiment analysis applied to works of fiction to extract their emotional arcs— “we use a simple, robust sentiment analysis tool to extract the reader-perceived emotional content of written stories as they unfold on the page”transfers[0]
mechanismthree independent methods are run over the same arcs - matrix decomposition, hierarchical clustering and an unsupervised self-organising map - and the paper states that confirmation comes only from the three supporting each other— “For our analysis, we apply three independent tools: matrix decomposition by singular value decomposition (SVD), supervised learning by agglomerative (hierarchical) clustering with Ward’s method, and unsupervised learning by a self-organizing map (SOM, a type of neural network). Each tool encompasses different strengths: the SVD finds the…mechanisms[0]
mechanismthe emotional arc is separated from the plot by construction: it is what the words invoke, and the paper says the same arc can arise from very different plots— “The emotional arc of a story does not give us direct information about the plot or the intended meaning of the story, but rather exists as part of the whole narrative (e.g., an emotional arc showing a fall in sentiment throughout a story may arise from very different plot and structure combinations).”mechanisms[1]
mechanismthe paper states plainly that the dictionary method it relies on performs WORSE THAN RANDOM on an individual sentence, which is why the instrument is never applied at sentence level the sliding-window construction itself is described in a different sentence and in the Figure 1 caption, not in this span; the window size is unquotable here because the extraction stores its digits as private-use glyphs— “We emphasize that dictionarybased methods for sentiment analysis usually perform worse than random on individual sentences”mechanisms[2]
mechanismthe arcs are mean-centred before decomposition so that the first mode is not spent on the average sentiment or on the positivity bias of language— “The modes are from meancentered emotional arcs, such that the first SVD mode need not extract the average from the labMT scores nor the positivity bias present in language”mechanisms[3]
mechanismclusters are built by Ward's method, which the paper describes as proceeding by minimising variance between clusters— “We use Ward’s method to generate a hierarchical clustering of stories, which proceeds by minimizing variance between clusters of books”mechanisms[4]
mechanismconflation of several arcs in one book is limited by restricting the corpus to shorter books, a filter chosen for that purpose— “We analyze the emotional arcs corresponding to complete books, and to limit the conflation of multiple core emotional arcs, we restrict our analysis to shorter books by selecting a maximum number of words when building our filter.”mechanisms[5]
builds-on sentiment analysis (from NLP)— “we use a simple, robust sentiment analysis tool to extract the reader-perceived emotional content of written stories as they unfold on the page”claim_relations[0]
builds-on Kurt Vonnegut's claim that the shapes of stories can be computed— “Vonnegut asserted: ‘There is no reason why the simple shapes of stories can’t be fed into computers, they are beautiful shapes.’”claim_relations[1]
senseemotional arc - NOT THE PLOT, and the paper names the conflation as the misunderstanding that drew criticism from the digital humanities community: the same falling arc can come from very different plots— “The emotional arc of a story does not give us direct information about the plot or the intended meaning of the story, but rather exists as part of the whole narrative (e.g., an emotional arc showing a fall in sentiment throughout a story may arise from very different plot and structure combinations). This distinction between the emotional arc…senses[0]
sensethe six arcs - AS THE INTERSECTION OF THREE PROCEDURES: modes of a matrix decomposition, clusters from Ward's algorithm, and clusters from an unsupervised map; six is what survives all three, not what any one of them returnssenses[1]
sensesentiment - AS A WINDOW AVERAGE: the reported quantity is the score of a sliding fixed-size window, never of a sentence, which is what makes the underlying dictionary usable at all
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[2]
sensefolkloristics - the study of society and culture through literary analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[3]
sensematrix decomposition - the SVD branch of the paper's three-tool analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[4]
sensesingular value decomposition - SVD used for matrix decomposition of emotional arcs
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[5]
sensesupervised learning - the paper's label for agglomerative clustering with Ward's method
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[6]
senseagglomerative hierarchical clustering - the supervised analysis performed with Ward's method
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[7]
senseWard's method - the method used in the agglomerative hierarchical clustering branch
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[8]
senseunsupervised learning - the paper's label for the self-organizing-map analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[9]
senseself-organizing map - SOM, the neural-network branch of the unsupervised analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[10]
senseneural network - the class to which the self-organizing map is assigned
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[11]
senseRags to riches - rise
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[12]
senseTragedy - fall, also called Riches to rags
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[13]
senseRiches to rags - the alternative label for the falling Tragedy arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[14]
senseMan in a hole - fall then rise
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[15]
senseIcarus - rise then fall
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[16]
senseCinderella - rise, fall, then rise
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[17]
senseOedipus - fall, rise, then fall
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[18]
senseword salad - a null story version without coherent plot or emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[19]
sensenonsense - a null story version without coherent plot or emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[20]
sensenull model - a written-story comparison lacking coherent plot or structure
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
senses[21]
controlevery method re-run at four different DOWNLOAD-COUNT thresholds. THE NUMERALS SURVIVE EXTRACTION AS PRIVATE-USE-AREA GLYPHS (U+F639, U+F63C ...) rather than digits, so the thresholds are present in the text and unreadable; they are quoted as they stand and not guessed — held
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
— rules out the popularity cut-off as the source of the emotional-arc findings - a corpus filtered by downloads is a corpus of what people read, and an arc shape could be a property of the filter rather than of literature
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
controls[0]
edgeemotional arc —distinct-from→ plot
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[0]
edgeemotional arc —operationalised-as→ Hedonometer
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[1]
noteself-organizing map —is-a→ neural network — The paper explicitly calls SOM a type of neural network.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concept_edges[2]
outcomecontrol — held
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
controls[0]
evidence statuslimitation — quote-not-in-current-staged-text
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
evidence status notelimitation — tagged against an earlier extraction of this paper; the staged file has since changed. The claim may still be sound - the QUOTE is unanchorable. Not deleted, not repaired, not verified., 2026-08-15: the quote IS present, verbatim once whitespace is normalised, in the web page we fetched. The staged text this flag refers to is a lossier extraction of the same paper, so the tag is UNVERIFIED AGAINST THE FILE THE VERIFIER READS rather than unverifiable. Re-staging would move every offset and hash on the record and is a staging decision, not a tagging one.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
not machine-vouchedlimitation — not-in-our-copy - The quote is in the original page we fetched for this paper ('fulltext.html'), but not in the text we tag against, which was extracted differently. Checked with ligatures, hyphens, spacing and punctuation set aside. This body carries 13 '(cid:NNN)' glyph ids.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
for which uselimitation — the success analysis only: DOWNLOADS ARE ONLY A ROUGH PROXY FOR SUCCESS
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[1]
for which uselimitation — the resolution of every arc: OUR METHOD DOES NOT PICK UP EMOTIONAL MOMENTS DISCUSSED BRIEFLY, PERHAPS IN ONE PARAGRAPH OR SENTENCE (E.G., THE FIRST KISS OF HARRY AND GINNY)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[2]
for which uselimitation — any narrative reading of the arcs: an emotional arc is not the plot and does not identify it
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
for which uselimitation — the corpus the arcs were derived from: TO LIMIT THE CONFLATION OF MULTIPLE CORE EMOTIONAL ARCS, WE RESTRICT OUR ANALYSIS TO SHORTER BOOKS
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[4]
for which uselimitation — any sentence-level or short-passage reading of these sentiment scores: the authors state that dictionary-based sentiment methods usually perform worse than random on individual sentences, and the arcs are built from a rolling average instead
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[5]
for which uselimitation — the six-arc finding: it is confirmed only by considering the results of each tool in support of the others - a matrix decomposition, a hierarchical clustering and an unsupervised map - so a citation of 'six basic shapes' that drops the three-method agreement drops the evidence
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
for which uselimitation — the six SVD modes as six arcs: the paper says the high-frequency modes contribute little variance and do not align with the core archetypes recovered by the other methods, and are included only for completeness
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[7]
replicationuntested
limitationthe sentiment method requires a minimum window of ~10,000 words for meaningful scores
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
limitationSuccess is measured only by Project Gutenberg download counts.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[1]
limitationThe sliding-window method cannot detect briefly mentioned emotional events.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[2]
limitationAn emotional arc is not the plot and does not identify it.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
limitationOnly shorter books were analysed, to avoid conflating several core arcs.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[4]
limitationThe sentiment tool is stated to perform worse than random on individual sentences, and is made usable only by averaging over a rolling window.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[5]
limitationThe result is what three different methods agree on; the paper says no single tool establishes it.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
limitationTwo of the six decomposition modes are retained for completeness and are stated not to match the archetypes the other methods produce.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[7]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
findingsix core emotional arcs are the building blocks of story trajectories
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[0]
findingparticular emotional arcs enjoy greater download success
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[1]
findingthe findings are strengthened by separately applying matrix decomposition
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[2]
evidence status notefinding — QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted.content_tags.findings[2]
findingthe emotional arc is distinct from the plot
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[3]
quantity1,327 stories — filtered Project Gutenberg fiction corpus
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[0]
quantity6 core arcs — basic emotional-arc shapes found
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[1]
quantity3 methods — independent techniques used to confirm the arcs
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[2]
evidence status notequantity — QUOTE RECOVERED FROM THE PAPER'S OWN CHARACTERS. The recorded quote was LETTERS-ONLY IDENTICAL to this stretch of the staged text but not an exact substring of it - spaces, hyphens, ligature glyphs or mathematical operators differed, so it could never anchor. This is the file's own text between the same two letters: not produced by a rule about the damage, copied out of the file. Round-trip checked (the recovered span is letters-only equal to the original) and length-checked. The text as originally recorded is kept in evidence as extracted. The quote was later extended to the end of the list it begins; the recovered stretch is kept as the earlier quote.content_tags.quantities[2]
variableemotional arc (sentiment trajectory across a story)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[0]
variablesentiment (signal extracted from text)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[1]
variabledownloads (proxy for story success)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[2]
variableplot (chronological backbone, distinct from the arc)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[3]
definitionemotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[0]
definitionnarratology
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[1]
definitionsentiment analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[2]
definitionplot
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[3]
key-termsemotional arcs, stories, sentiment analysis, narrative, plot, six basic shapes, digital humanities, matrix decomposition, unsupervised learning, Project Gutenberg
Concepts
terms this paper carries, each with the sentence it was cut from — the layer that joins one paper to another. Terms with no quote yet are on CONCEPTS.html.
conceptemotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[0]
conceptsentiment analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[1]
conceptplot
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[4]
conceptHedonometer
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[5]
conceptlabMT
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[6]
conceptfolkloristics — the study of society and culture through literary analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[7]
conceptmatrix decomposition — not defined in this paper's own words; one of three independent analysis tools, implemented here through singular value decomposition
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[8]
conceptsingular value decomposition — not defined in this paper's own words; SVD, the matrix-decomposition method used as one of three independent analyses of emotional arcs
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[9]
conceptsupervised learning — not defined in this paper's own words; the paper's category for agglomerative hierarchical clustering with Ward's method
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[10]
conceptagglomerative (hierarchical) clustering — not defined in this paper's own words; the supervised-learning clustering analysis performed with Ward's method
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[11]
conceptWard’s method — not defined in this paper's own words; the method used for the agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[12]
conceptunsupervised learning — not defined in this paper's own words; the paper's category for the self-organizing-map analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[13]
conceptself-organizing map — not defined in this paper's own words; SOM, a neural-network method used for the unsupervised analysis
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[14]
conceptneural network — not defined in this paper's own words; the method class to which the paper assigns the self-organizing map
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[15]
conceptRags to riches — not defined in this paper's own words; the rising emotional-arc shape
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[16]
conceptTragedy — not defined in this paper's own words; the falling emotional-arc shape, also labelled Riches to rags
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[17]
conceptRiches to rags — not defined in this paper's own words; the alternative label for the falling Tragedy emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[18]
conceptMan in a hole — not defined in this paper's own words; the fall-then-rise emotional-arc shape
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[19]
conceptIcarus — not defined in this paper's own words; the rise-then-fall emotional-arc shape
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[20]
conceptCinderella — not defined in this paper's own words; the rise-fall-rise emotional-arc shape
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[21]
conceptOedipus — not defined in this paper's own words; the fall-rise-fall emotional-arc shape
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[22]
conceptword salad — not defined in this paper's own words; a null comparison version of a story lacking coherent plot or structure and therefore a coherent emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[23]
conceptnonsense — not defined in this paper's own words; a null comparison version of a story lacking coherent plot or structure and therefore a coherent emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[24]
conceptnull model — not defined in this paper's own words; written-story comparisons without coherent plot or structure to generate a coherent emotional arc
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[25]
Statistics — cross-field join keys
field-invariant statistical terms, used in their statistical sense (gated on a number / symbol / test). A p-value or a standard deviation means the SAME thing in physics, biology, psychology and sociology — so these are the strongest cross-field join keys. Grounded verbatim.
mean μ as written: average of
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[0]
sample-size n/N as written: N = 1
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[2]
evidence status notesample-size — NOT REPAIRED, AND REVERTED AFTER IT WAS. This quote is verbatim in the web page we fetched and carries a real minus sign in '2( N − 1)'. The grounding copy has an en dash there. A repair that normalised dashes matched the two and replaced the correct character with the poorer extraction's. The quote stays as the paper set it and stays unanchorable against the grounding copy, which is the honest state - the project, 2026-08-23 17:35: the quotes are right, the staging is what disagrees.content_tags.statistics[2]
variance σ²
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.statistics[3]

When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.

Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification. · back to index · concepts · authors · עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824