A systemic approach to the psychology of racial bias within individuals and society — TEI-tagged view

Skinner-Dorkenoo, George, Wages, Sánchez, Perry · 2023 · social-psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00190-z · full text at the source · TEI xml · tagged edition · index · concepts · authors
Where this record's text came from. faceted 2026-08 by reading the locally held text (xml); every evidence string verified as an exact substring of that text before merging. Claim type is a close call. The review carries a real critique of the field ('this approach largely ignores the systemic nature of racial biases and the ways in which racial biases are shaped by the broader cultural systems in which people live'), and one could defensibly tag it 'critique'; I chose 'mechanism' because the substantive body of the article is a causal account of how five systemic factors produce individual bias and how individual bias reproduces the systems, with the critique serving as framing for that account. Caste is the only prior work the review names in a sentence that also states a relation to its own argument — everything else, including the nested-levels models it adopts (refs 17-20), is cited numerically, so those were not recorded as relations. Two evidence-quality signals in the paper that the facets cannot hold: it twice flags supporting studies as preprints that have not undergone peer review, and it explicitly notes that the effect of exposure to cultural products on racial attitudes has never been experimentally tested. The intervention agenda (racial socialization in white families, bias awareness, historical education) is a fifth of the article and has no facet. 2026-08-12 schema-0.3 pass: every quote verified as an exact substring of the staged text and anchored at merge time; concept terms verified present; every edge endpoint an existing node.
5 quotations on this page contain a reference number where the paper printed a superscript. This journal style prints citations as raised numerals — parameters12,13 — and the extraction flattened them into the line, so the sentence reads parameters 12 , 13 . The digits are citation markers and not part of what the author wrote. The quotes keep them for the same reason they keep every other extraction fault: a quote is reproduced exactly or it proves nothing.
This record’s own method is review, and the tags below follow from that. A review’s findings, quantities and statistics are things stated IN this paper, and some of them report results obtained elsewhere. No tag on this page names a different author. Measured across every review in this corpus, 81% of a review’s tags carry no citation at all — most of them are the review speaking. The corpus does not adjudicate the rest: read an unmarked tag as a claim this paper makes, not necessarily one it made first.
Tags on this paper every tag the record carries, whether or not the words occur in the text below — a number is how many papers in the corpus carry that tag; a tag with no number is unique to this paper
racial bias2 systemic factors individual-level2 nested levels of influence temporal influences power and privilege cultural narratives implicit bias2 cultural context review319

Our tag layer for this paper

Cross-disciplinary analysis
content-tags & facets: phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text
phenomenonracial bias— “Racial bias refers to favouring or providing preferential treatment to members of one racial group over another.”
claim-typemechanism— “We argue that systemic factors operating across levels — from the interpersonal to the cultural — contribute to the production and reinforcement of racial biases in children and adults.”
method — evidence— “In this Review, we examine the bidirectional relation between individual-level racial biases and broader societal systems through a systemic lens.”
object of study — evidence— “We consider the effects of five systemic factors on racial biases in the USA: power and privilege disparities, cultural narratives and values, segregated communities, shared stereotypes and nonverbal messages.”
research question — evidence— “However, this approach largely ignores the systemic nature of racial biases and the ways in which racial biases are shaped by the broader cultural systems in which people live 12 – 14 .”
contribution — evidence— “We argue that systemic factors operating across levels — from the interpersonal to the cultural — contribute to the production and reinforcement of racial biases in children and adults.”
transferfrom race relations research, human development and cultural psychology: the nested-levels model of influence, imported to relate individual racial bias to the systems around it— “Models of nested levels of influence in the study of race relations 17 , human development 18 and culture 19 , 20 can be used to consider the relation between racial bias and broader systemic factors (Fig. 1 ).”transfers[0]
mechanismChildren raised in an unequal society, given no systemic explanation for that inequality, internalize the existing distribution of power and privilege as legitimate— “Children who are socialized in an unequal society, without systemic explanations for why power and privilege have been concentrated among certain people, often internalize that system 34 .”mechanisms[0]
mechanismInternalized expectations of inequality drive behaviour that maintains the system, so individual attitudes reproduce the very inequality that generated them (a self-reinforcing loop)— “These beliefs and expectations then motivate the individuals that make up the system to behave in ways that maintain the system of inequality, such that individuals’ attitudes reinforce the system of inequality that produced them.”mechanisms[1]
mechanismNonverbal bias propagates as an expanding transmission system: seeing biased signals creates biased attitudes, which are then expressed as biased signals that others in the social network observe and adopt— “Thus, nonverbal biases can be thought of as an expanding system of transmission wherein exposure to nonverbal biases contributes to the development of racially biased attitudes; those attitudes then manifest as biased nonverbal signals, which others within the social network will then see, leading them to develop biases, and so on 233 .”mechanisms[2]
mechanismDevaluing cultural products lets people transmit racial bias while believing they are only judging the product, hiding the bias from the person holding it— “This contribution to individual-level racial bias is particularly insidious because it creates conditions under which people can obliviously perpetuate racial biases, believing their bias to be against the cultural products they perceive as inferior rather than the people associated with the products.”mechanisms[3]
mechanismsystem justification: growing up inside an unequal arrangement without an explanation for it leads children and adults to conclude the arrangement is right— “Both children and adults tend to conclude that the way things are structured in society is the way they should be 35 – 42 .”mechanisms[4]
mechanismstructural exposure predicts individual bias - the composition of a university, a neighbourhood's poverty rate, a community's economic mobility all track measured implicit bias— “Attending a university with few faculty members of colour, living in an area that has high poverty rates among Black residents and living in a community with low economic mobility all predict heightened implicit bias against Black people among non-Black American residents”mechanisms[5]
mechanismbacklash: information that inequality is decreasing can raise bias rather than lower it— “White residents of the USA who were exposed to information about the increasing racial diversity of the USA subsequently exhibited increased bias favouring white people relative to those who were not exposed to this information 47 – 50 .”mechanisms[6]
mechanismthe return path: aggregate individual bias in a county tracks institutional outcomes such as school discipline, so attitudes reconstitute the systems that produced them— “In American counties where the individual-level bias against Black people is stronger, there are larger racial disparities in school disciplinary actions, with Black students being subjected to more suspensions, expulsions, and referrals to law enforcement than white students 58 .”mechanisms[7]
builds-on Caste: The Origins Of Our Discontents— “Some of these similarities are highlighted in the book Caste: The Origins Of Our Discontents 29 — which draws parallels between the systems of oppression of Black people in the USA, Jewish people in Nazi Germany and Dalit people in India.”claim_relations[0]
builds-on prior arguments (ref. 11) that individuals and systems mutually reinforce one another in organizations and the workplace— “Similar arguments about individuals and systems mutually reinforcing one another have been made in the context of organizations and the workplace 11 .”claim_relations[1]
contradicts the individual-level tradition in the psychology of racial bias— “Historically, the field of psychology has focused on racial biases at an individual level, considering the effects of various stimuli on individual racial attitudes and biases.”claim_relations[2]
extends nested-levels models from race relations, human development and culture research— “Models of nested levels of influence in the study of race relations 17 , human development 18 and culture 19 , 20 can be used to consider the relation between racial bias and broader systemic factors (Fig. 1 ).”claim_relations[3]
sensebias - a property of a PERSON: an attitude favouring one group, measured on individuals in response to stimuli— “Historically, the field of psychology has focused on racial biases at an individual level, considering the effects of various stimuli on individual racial attitudes and biases.”senses[0]
sensebias - a property of a SYSTEM: patterns built into institutions and culture, which produce individual attitudes rather than summing them— “However, this approach largely ignores the systemic nature of racial biases and the ways in which racial biases are shaped by the broader cultural systems in which people live 12 – 14 .”senses[1]
senselevel - a nested shell of context around the person: interpersonal, community, cultural, temporal— “At the innermost level are the most proximal influences on individual-level racial bias — personal and interpersonal experiences, such as socialization from caregivers and interracial friendships.”senses[2]
edgesystemic factors —causes→ racial bias— “We argue that systemic factors operating across levels — from the interpersonal to the cultural — contribute to the production and reinforcement of racial biases in children and adults.”concept_edges[0]
edgepower and privilege —part-of→ systemic factors— “We consider the effects of five systemic factors on racial biases in the USA: power and privilege disparities, cultural narratives and values, segregated communities, shared stereotypes and nonverbal messages.”concept_edges[3]
edgecultural narratives —part-of→ systemic factors— “We consider the effects of five systemic factors on racial biases in the USA: power and privilege disparities, cultural narratives and values, segregated communities, shared stereotypes and nonverbal messages.”concept_edges[4]
for which uselimitation — the geographic scope of every claim: WE FOCUS ON THE USA BECAUSE IT IS THE CONTEXT THAT WE HAVE THE CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE TO DISCUSS AND WHERE MOST RESEARCH ... HAS BEEN CONDUCTED— “We focus on the USA because it is the context that we have the cultural knowledge to discuss and where most research on racial bias development has been conducted.”limitations[0]
for which uselimitation — the completeness of the systemic account: THEY ARE CERTAINLY NOT THE ONLY SYSTEMIC FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RACIAL BIASES— “Although they are certainly not the only systemic factors that influence racial biases, we focus on these five because we believe them to be particularly relevant to the development of racial biases in the contemporary USA.”limitations[1]
for which uselimitation — the causal reading of the reviewed evidence: IN SOME CASES THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF THE CAUSAL CHAIN ... WHEREAS IN OTHERS, THERE MIGHT BE EVIDENCE OF AN ASSOCIATION— “In some cases, there is clear evidence of the causal chain from system to individual and from individual to system, whereas in others, there might be evidence of an association, but the direction of influence is unclear.”limitations[2]
for which uselimitation — the weight of the evidence base: THE LITERATURE IN THIS AREA IS STILL RELATIVELY SPARSE— “Although there is a growing body of literature tying systemic influences to individual-level biases, the literature in this area is still relatively sparse.”limitations[3]
for which uselimitation — the transfer of the framework beyond the USA: THE SYSTEMIC FACTORS THAT PERPETUATE RACIAL BIASES INTO THE PRESENT MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT DISTINCT FROM OTHER CONTEXTS— “Given this history of racism in the USA, the systemic factors that perpetuate racial biases into the present might be somewhat distinct from other contexts.”limitations[4]
duplicate oflimitation — limitations[2]limitations[5]
for which uselimitation — the same scope as limitations[2] - association rather than causal chain in placeslimitations[5]
duplicate oflimitation — limitations[1]limitations[6]
for which uselimitation — the same scope as limitations[1] - five factors chosen, not exhaustive
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
for which uselimitation — any one-directional use of this review: INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL BIASES AND BROADER SOCIETAL SYSTEMS MIGHT BE MUTUALLY REINFORCING, BUT FOR CLARITY WE TAKE THE APPROACH OF ASSESSING EACH DIRECTION OF INFLUENCE SEPARATELY - the loop is cut for exposition
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[7]
replicationuntested
limitationScope is restricted to the USA, chosen for the authors' cultural knowledge and the location of most existing research.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[0]
limitationThe five systemic factors reviewed are a selection, not an exhaustive set.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[1]
limitationFor part of the reviewed evidence the direction of influence between individual bias and system is not established, only association.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[2]
limitationThe empirical base linking systemic influences to individual-level bias is described as still thin.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[3]
limitationRestricted to the USA by the authors' own statement, and the paper says the systemic factors may not transfer.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[4]
limitationThe causal direction is not established throughout - in places only an association is available.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[5]
limitationThe five factors are chosen, not exhaustive, and the authors say so.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[6]
limitationMutual reinforcement is treated as two separable directions for expositional clarity, which is an analytic simplification the paper flags.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
limitations[7]
Content tags
content-observations: finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text
findingThe review considers the effects of five systemic factors on racial bias in the USA: power and privilege disparities, cultural narratives and values, segregated communities, shared stereotypes and nonverbal messages.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[0]
findingThe relation runs in both directions: each of the five systemic factors shapes individual-level bias, and individual-level bias in turn shapes systems and inequalities at every nested level.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[1]
findingTelling white Americans that the country is becoming more racially diverse increases, rather than decreases, their bias in favour of white people.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[2]
findingLiving in a state with more Black residents was associated with increased racial bias only among white residents with limited close contact with Black people.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[3]
findingColourblind ideology functions to keep policies that are formally race-neutral racially biased in their effects.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[4]
findingBecause the cultural products of people of colour are devalued at a societal level, individuals develop bias against those who use and produce them.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[5]
findingIndividual bias devalues and negatively stereotypes physical spaces occupied by people of colour, which makes those spaces less desirable to white people and so reinforces residential segregation.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[6]
findingThe causal effect of exposure to cultural products on racial attitudes has never been tested experimentally, which the authors identify as an open gap.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[7]
findingMarkers of structural inequality in a person's surroundings predict their measured implicit bias.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[8]
findingBeing told the country is becoming more diverse increased pro-white bias rather than reducing it.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[9]
findingAggregate individual bias tracks institutional outcomes: county-level bias predicts racial disparities in school suspensions, expulsions and police referrals.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[10]
findingGreater individual anti-Black bias was associated with a lower likelihood of voting for Obama in 2008 and less support for his healthcare reform.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[11]
findingThe authors judge interventions aimed at individual attitudes unlikely to address the systemic causes of bias.
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.findings[12]
quantityapproximately 40% — share of US residents in 2020 polling who thought that paying less attention to race would improve racial inequality
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[0]
quantityroughly five times — Black-to-white ratio of US incarceration rates as of 2021
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[1]
quantity75% — share of neighbours who are white for the average white American, as an index of residential segregation
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[2]
quantity40% — proportion of preschool children exposed to biased nonverbal signals who then copied those signals themselves
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[3]
quantity67% ... less than 8% — share of South African top management positions held by white people in 2017, versus their share of the population
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[4]
quantity100 times higher — the War on Drugs sentencing ratio between substances used disproportionately by Black versus white Americans
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[5]
quantity57% ... 30% — how often observers attributed their attitude towards a target to the target's own behaviour rather than to the biased treatment the target received
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[6]
quantityfive systemic factors — the factors the review covers: power and privilege, cultural narratives and values, segregated communities, shared stereotypes, nonverbal messages
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.quantities[7]
variablesystemic factors (independent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[0]
variableindividual-level racial bias (dependent)
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.variables[1]
definitionracial bias
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[0]
definitionintergroup contact
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[1]
definitionracial socialization
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[2]
definitionredlining
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[3]
definitionracially colourblind ideology
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[4]
definitioneminent domain
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[5]
definitionmanifest destiny
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[6]
definitionracial bias
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[7]
definitionthe nested levels of influence
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[8]
definitiontemporal influences
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
content_tags.definitions[9]
key-termsracial bias, systemic factors, nested levels of influence, individual-level, power and privilege, cultural narratives, segregated communities, shared stereotypes, nonverbal messages, implicit bias, temporal influences, cultural context
Concepts
terms this paper carries, each with the sentence it was cut from — the layer that joins one paper to another. Terms with no quote yet are on CONCEPTS.html.
conceptracial bias — not defined in this paper's own words; favouring or giving preferential treatment to members of one racial group over another
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[0]
conceptsystemic factors — not defined in this paper's own words; features of the society rather than of the person - the distribution of power, the narratives told, the segregation of places - that produce and reinforce bias
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[1]
conceptindividual-level — not defined in this paper's own words; the unit of analysis psychology has traditionally used: one person's attitudes, measured in response to stimuli
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[2]
conceptnested levels of influence — not defined in this paper's own words; a framework in which the person sits inside interpersonal, community, cultural and temporal shells, each acting on the next
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[3]
concepttemporal influences — not defined in this paper's own words; the outermost shell: how past arrangements keep acting on people after the arrangements themselves have changed
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[4]
conceptpower and privilege — not defined in this paper's own words; the first of the five factors - who occupies the respected roles, and what a child infers from that
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[5]
conceptcultural narratives — not defined in this paper's own words; the histories a society tells about itself, including which perspectives a curriculum omits
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[6]
conceptimplicit bias — not defined in this paper's own words; bias as measured indirectly rather than reported, and the quantity that structural markers are shown to predict
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[7]
conceptcultural context — not defined in this paper's own words; the shell above community: the norms, values and beliefs that structure a society
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
concepts[8]
Second readings
a facet read a second time, independently, from its own sentence — and whether the two readings agree
claim typemechanism — a second reading reaching the same value; recorded: mechanism
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
alternatives.claim_type
phenomenonbidirectional relation between systemic racial inequality and individual-level racial bias — a second reading DIFFERING from the recorded value; recorded: racial bias
Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher.
alternatives.phenomenon

When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.

Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification. · back to index · concepts · authors · עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824