phenomenon · claim-type · cross-domain-transfer · mechanism · claim-relation · replication-status · limitation — grounded in the full text| phenomenon | remote gig workers experiencing genuine autonomy and severe overwork as two effects of the same system of control— “The autonomy resulting from algorithmic control can lead to overwork, sleep deprivation and exhaustion as a consequence of the weak structural power of workers vis-a-vis clients.” | |
| claim-type | existence— “Despite varying country contexts and types of work, we show that algorithmic control is central to the operation of online labour platforms. Algorithmic management techniques tend to offer workers high levels of flexibility, autonomy, task variety and complexity. However, these mechanisms of control can also result in low pay, social… | |
| method — evidence | — “Our analysis is primarily based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 107 workers. The worker informants consist of 36 workers in Southeast Asia (SEA, comprising 12 in the Philippines, five in Malaysia and 19 in Vietnam), and 71 in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA, comprising 29 in Kenya, 23 in Nigeria and 19 in South Africa).” | |
| object of study — evidence | — “This article evaluates the job quality of work in the remote gig economy. Such work consists of the remote provision of a wide variety of digital services mediated by online labour platforms.” | |
| research question — evidence | — “The second aim of this article is therefore to identify the organisational forms (such as Taylorist and algorithmic controls) that could explain commonalities in the quality remote gig work across the platforms and countries that we study, and how these organisational forms are shaped by power and technology.” | |
| contribution — evidence | — “The identification of the ‘symbolic power’ ( Thompson, 1991) of platform reputations as an emerging form of marketplace bargaining power is an important contribution of this article.” | |
| mechanism | CONTROL AT THE END OF THE LABOUR PROCESS, NOT DURING IT. Only the delivered product is judged, so the worker is genuinely free in method, hours and place - and the same fact means the rating that governs all future work is assigned after the work is done and cannot be argued with— “What is notable about this algorithmic system of control in terms of job quality, compared to Taylorist forms of informational control, is that control operated at the end of the labour process rather than during it.” | mechanisms[0] |
| mechanism | NON-PROXIMITY DEFEATS SUPERVISION AND THE RATING RESTORES IT: clients in high-income countries cannot watch workers in SEA and SSA, so direct monitoring fails - and platform rating and ranking overcome exactly the spatial and temporal barriers that defeated it— “This weak structural power is an outcome of platform-based rating and ranking systems enabling a form of control which is able to overcome the spatial and temporal barriers that non-proximity places on the effectiveness of direct labour process surveillance and supervision.” | mechanisms[1] |
| mechanism | RANKING IS THE SANCTION: platforms do not dismiss low-rated workers, they filter work away from them, so the penalty is invisible, gradual and unappealable - continuing on the platform simply stops being a viable living— “online labour platforms, instead, use algorithms to filter work away from those with low ratings, thus making continuing on the platform a less viable means of making a living.” | mechanisms[2] |
| mechanism | DIRECT MONITORING WAS EASILY CIRCUMVENTED - keystroke counts and screenshots were worked around by timing and by a second monitor - which is why the reputational mechanism, not the surveillance mechanism, is the effective one— “For instance, frequencies of workers’ keyboard presses and mouse movements were tracked and shots taken of their screens. However, these monitoring mechanisms were easily circumvented.” | mechanisms[3] |
| mechanism | WORKERS WELCOMED THE MONITORING because the platform guaranteed payment for monitored work: surveillance was traded for protection against wage theft, so the same mechanism is a safeguard and a control depending on who is short of power— “In fact, the monitoring was often welcomed by workers, because the platform guaranteed payments for monitored work, protecting workers from non-payment and wage theft” | mechanisms[4] |
| mechanism | FORMAL CONTROL WITHOUT REAL CHOICE: workers hold genuine authority over where and when they work and have little real alternative to home and to unsocial hours, because client demand and weak structural power set the terms— “while algorithmic control provides remote gig workers with formal control over where they work, workers may have little real choice but to work from home, and this can lead to a lack of social contact and feelings of social isolation.” | mechanisms[5] |
| mechanism | AN UNREGULATED GLOBAL OVERSUPPLY OF LABOUR is what the platform connects clients to, and it is the source of the weak structural power that turns autonomy into overwork— “Online labour platforms thus facilitate clients in connecting with a largely unregulated global oversupply of labour.” | mechanisms[6] |
| contradicts | accounts which hold that ICTs bring Taylorist organisational forms to white-collar work - the 'assembly line in the head' and 'electronic sweatshop' readings - which this study's remote gig workers do not fit— “Thus remote gig work is a long way from being an ‘assembly line in the head’ ( Bain and Taylor, 2000) or ‘electronic sweatshop’” | claim_relations[0] |
| contradicts | Shapiro's characterisation of gig-work autonomy as 'autonomy over minute decisions', which the authors find far from minute for remote gig work— “Shapiro (2017) refers to the autonomy of local gig workers over things such as when to work and which orders to accept or reject as only constituting ‘autonomy over minute decisions’. Yet our findings suggest that for remote gig workers the level of discretion is far from minute.” | claim_relations[1] |
| extends | Silver's and Wright's concept of marketplace bargaining power, which this article extends with a symbolic form neither of them considers— “Marketplace bargaining power is a concept developed by Silver (2003) and Wright (2000), neither of whom consider the importance of symbolic forms of power.” | claim_relations[2] |
| qualifies | the literature on Taylorist informational control, which is predominantly based on call-centre research and was generalised into theories of effort-biased technology adoption— “Accounts of Taylorist informational control are predominately based on research in call centres. However, this research has informed more general theories regarding the adoption of technology being ‘effort biased’” | claim_relations[3] |
| sense | autonomy - IN THIS PAPER A REAL AND MEASURED FREEDOM THAT DOES NOT IMPLY GOOD WORK. 72% could choose the order of tasks and 74% their methods, and the same workers report overwork, sleep deprivation and exhaustion. The paper's whole argument is that autonomy and job quality come apart, so reading `autonomy` as a job-quality outcome inverts the finding— “This is echoed in our survey, where 72% of respondents felt able to choose and change the order in which they undertook online tasks, and 74% were able to choose or change their methods of work.” | senses[0] |
| sense | algorithmic control - CONTROL EXERCISED AT THE END OF THE LABOUR PROCESS RATHER THAN DURING IT. That single structural fact generates the whole pattern: because only the output is judged, the worker is free in how they work, and because the rating governs future work, the freedom is unusable— “What is notable about this algorithmic system of control in terms of job quality, compared to Taylorist forms of informational control, is that control operated at the end of the labour process rather than during it.” | senses[1] |
| sense | algorithmic management - NOT SUPERVISION BY MACHINE BUT CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT EXTENDED: the client is placed in the management circuit, and the platform's ranking turns their rating into a sanction. The controller is another user, not an algorithm with a policy— “Algorithmic management is an extension of ‘customer management’ strategies, which entails positioning customers ‘as agents in the management circuit’, so that ‘customers, rather than managers, are […] the ones who must be pleased, whose orders must be followed, whose ideas… | senses[2] |
| sense | platform reputation - AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE IN THE LABOUR MARKET, alongside skills, rather than a signal about past work. It is what the paper means by reputation having `symbolic power`: it is held by the worker, cannot be transferred between platforms, and determines what work is reachable at all | senses[3] |
| control | 40 of the 147 workers interviewed were excluded because they did not use either of the two platforms under study — held — rules out workers with no experience of the two platforms under study contributing to findings about those platforms - 40 of 147 interviewees were excluded on that ground Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| control | 174 of 853 survey responses were excluded - wrong region, incomplete job-quality modules, or a failed attention check - leaving 679 — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out inattentive or mis-targeted responses as a source of the survey results - 174 of 853 were removed for wrong region, incomplete modules, or a failed attention check Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[1] |
| control | participants were told the interview was research and not a job, and that no platform feedback would be left either way - removing the reputational stake that would otherwise shape what a rated worker says — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out the reputational stake as an influence on what workers said - participants were told it was research, not a job, and that no platform feedback would be left either way Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[2] |
| control | purposive invitation across countries, genders and skills was used in place of an open task, which the authors argue mitigates self-selection on task-type preference and reservation wage — partial Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. — rules out self-selection on task-type preference and reservation wage, which an open posted task would have introduced - purposive invitation across countries, genders and skills was used instead Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[3] |
| audit | algorithmic control —distinct-from→ Taylorist — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span lists Taylorist and algorithmic controls as forms; it does not assert a distinction. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[0] |
| weight | algorithmic control —distinct-from→ Taylorist — 0.95 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[0] |
| audit | algorithmic management —is-a→ customer management — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span calls algorithmic management an EXTENSION of customer management; is-a is loose. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| weight | algorithmic management —is-a→ customer management — 0.95 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[1] |
| audit | algorithmic control —causes→ autonomy — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but endpoint by anaphora: 'This form of control' = algorithmic control (previous sentence); the span says algorithmic management FACILITATES autonomy. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[2] |
| weight | algorithmic control —causes→ autonomy — 0.9 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[2] |
| audit | algorithmic control —causes→ overwork — Audit 2026-09-28: DOUBTFUL - read against its full span and kept, but the span says algorithmic control CAN lead to overwork; hedged. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| effect direction | algorithmic control —causes→ overwork — increases Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| weight | algorithmic control —causes→ overwork — 0.9 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[3] |
| weight | symbolic power —is-a→ marketplace bargaining power — 0.95 Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concept_edges[4] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[0] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[1] |
| outcome | control — held Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[2] |
| outcome | control — partial Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | controls[3] |
| limitation | probability sampling is stated to be impossible on an online labour platform, because the chance of any member seeing the survey task is unequal and unknown Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[0] |
| limitation | response rates were 30% and 7% on the two platforms, which the authors call low by conventional social survey standards Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[1] |
| limitation | the sample resembles a quota sample except that subsample sizes were not predefined - they depended on how easy each subpopulation was to find Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[2] |
| limitation | the population of remote gig workers is called an ambiguous concept, since engagement runs from a registered account to a full-time income and changes over time; the authors define it by a work threshold instead Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[3] |
| limitation | the survey is used only to show that interview themes are shared more widely, not to estimate population quantities Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[4] |
| limitation | research on remote gig work quality is limited in both the number of studies and the breadth of platforms and countries covered, which bounds what the findings can be compared against Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | limitations[5] |
finding · quantity · variable · definition · key-term — grounded in the full text| finding | Algorithmic control is central to online labour platforms, bringing autonomy and flexibility but also low pay, isolation, unsocial hours, overwork and exhaustion. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[0] |
| finding | control operates at the end of the labour process rather than during it, which is what distinguishes it from Taylorist informational control Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[1] |
| finding | Online labour platforms filter work away from low-rated workers. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[2] |
| finding | Workers often welcomed monitoring because the platform guaranteed payment for monitored work. Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[3] |
| finding | skills and platform reputation are the individual resources that matter most; workers lacking them suffered low incomes and insecurity Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.findings[4] |
| quantity | 107 interviews across six countries (36 in Southeast Asia, 71 in Sub-Saharan Africa) over seven months of fieldwork — Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[0] |
| quantity | 679 survey respondents after exclusions, 40% female and 60% male, 51% SEA and 49% SSA — Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[1] |
| quantity | 72% could choose or change the order of their tasks and 74% their methods of work — Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[2] |
| quantity | survey response rates of 30% and 7% on the two platforms — Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.quantities[3] |
| variable | skills Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[2] |
| variable | platform reputation Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.variables[3] |
| definition | gig economy Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[0] |
| definition | remote gig work Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[1] |
| definition | algorithmic management Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[2] |
| definition | Taylorist informational control Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | content_tags.definitions[3] |
| concept | algorithmic control Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[0] |
| concept | algorithmic management Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[1] |
| concept | gig economy Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[2] |
| concept | remote gig work Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[3] |
| concept | job quality Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[4] |
| concept | online labour platforms Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[5] |
| concept | autonomy Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[6] |
| concept | Taylorist Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[7] |
| concept | work intensity Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[8] |
| concept | symbolic power Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[9] |
| concept | marketplace bargaining power Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[10] |
| concept | structural power Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[11] |
| concept | platform reputation Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[12] |
| concept | social isolation Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[13] |
| concept | customer management Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[14] |
| concept | labour process Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[15] |
| concept | discretion Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[16] |
| concept | overwork Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[17] |
| concept | non-proximity Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[18] |
| concept | theory elaboration Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[19] |
| concept | purposive Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[20] |
| concept | self-selection biases Quotation withheld — this paper is not ours to reproduce, and the page has already quoted as much of it as the rights layer allows. The tag, its field and its confidence stand; the sentence is at the publisher. | concepts[21] |
When we have changed our mind. Some entries in the table begin with a word in capitals and the reason for it. EVIDENCE CORRECTED — the finding still stands, but we had quoted the wrong sentence from the paper, and the quotation has been replaced with the right one. RETRACTED — the entry itself was wrong; it stays on the page, marked, with the reason, rather than being deleted. WITHDRAWN AND REPLACED — the entry was wrong, and a corrected version of it appears in the entries below. Each mark carries its own reason, in brackets, because the reasons differ from one entry to the next. An entry we have WITHDRAWN is removed from this page and kept in the record, with its reason. A line reading Audit and a date is a later re-reading of the entry against its whole sentence: DOUBTFUL means it was kept, and the reason says what is loose about it. Quotation marks inside the tagger's sentence. Where a tag is the tagger's own sentence, a phrase in quotation marks inside it is borrowed from the paper — the tagger's wording around it is not. The paper's own sentence is the evidence quote for that row; on this page it is withheld with the article, and the article is at its publisher. Nothing inside quotation marks anywhere on this page is ours: if it is quoted, it is the paper's. Whose words a concept carries. A concept entry records a term the paper itself uses, so the term, the sense given for it, and its evidence are the paper's own words, quoted where the paper fixes them. This is the opposite of a sense entry in the tag table, which is the tagger's sentence about how the paper uses a term. Where a concept entry could not be grounded in the paper's words, the entry says so on its own row.
Tag layer © the Meta-Tagging Project, CC BY 4.0. The paper text is © its authors/publisher
and is linked, not reproduced. Excerpts shown are short quotations for identification and verification.
· back to index
· concepts · authors
· עברית
© 2026 Shir Sivroni · ORCID 0009-0000-2597-2824